It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by cartenz
reply to post by beezzer
Puppets, yes. Do they all have the same puppet master? IMO I dont think they do. The geo-corporate interests controlling each head of governemnt/state differ, and most of these interests are competing for the same absolute power--Australian mining companies competing against UK banking interests competing against US military interests... the puppets try and make it look like we are all happy cosy allies, but push come to shove they will throw eachother under the proverbial bus just to gain advantage.
Solution?
Originally posted by liejunkie01
Doesn't the electoral college decide who is president?
Didn't al gore have more votes than bush back in the day?
One vote does not make a difference these days friend.
I love your posts beezer.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by woodwardjnr
But the choices are our responsibility as well! We sit back and let others lead, then complain when they don't go the way we want.
Originally posted by Hefficide
reply to post by beezzer
Puppets, puppeteers, and puppet masters.
It's not complicated at all. The rich hire lobbyists, who then bribe, coerce, blackmail, or talk the legislature into doing what "right for the home team."
The POTUS... well he's not just the President, but he's also a client.
~Heff
Originally posted by woodwardjnr
reply to post by beezzer
This is the answer I believe, all these protest groups should just form a lobby. Gotta be more effective than protesting and camping in parks. If you can't beat them, join them.
Then we need to Lobby our Lobby that is being influenced by their Lobby.
Originally posted by Hefficide
reply to post by beezzer
We already have one, it's called Congress! The fact that our lobby is being lobbied is where the problem actually lay.
~Heff
Originally posted by beezzer
Originally posted by liejunkie01
Doesn't the electoral college decide who is president?
Didn't al gore have more votes than bush back in the day?
One vote does not make a difference these days friend.
I love your posts beezer.
The Electoral College protects the rights of smaller states and states with smaller populations. Without it, only large population centers would be able to dictate for the rest of the nation.
Originally posted by Hefficide
reply to post by beezzer
Are we could simply inform our lobby that we have a binding contract with them that says their allegiance is to us and that if they deal with any other lobbying interests, then they are in breach of that contract.
I'm no legal eagle... but this how it seems to me. Especially when dealing with a group of guys who can raise their own pay, keep private religious facilities on Government property ( Oh, yes, there are prayer rooms of all ilk in the halls of Capitol Hill - tax payer funded religion )... We let our lobbyists get a bit too liberal ( in the literal - not cultural sense of the word ) with their power. Time to reign 'em in. Step one, make sure they understand that they cannot have two bosses - nor can they put any one segment of their constituency ahead of the other. This is the "excuse" used in Washington to justify lobbying. What ends up happening is the following...
Freshman Legislator shows up and says "I'm here to represent those who voted for me." I walk up and hand him five bucks and a decent bottle of scotch and he says "Correction, I"m here to serve this guy and then the those who voted for me! Then you walk up with a twenty spot and a bottle of really good scotch and he says "Just to clarify I'm here to work for this guy, then this guy and then the voters will have my undivided attention!
What's worse is that if you research the above links you'll discover that most of the most powerful lobbyists used to be career Senators or Congressmen - so the "good ole'' boys club" factor makes it even worse.
Abolishing the practice is the first step in removing the cancer.
~Heffedit on 10/5/12 by Hefficide because: (no reason given)