It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ollncasino
Yet the original court, which was in possession of more facts and evidence than you or I, decided that the children's interests were served best by the father having custody.
Incidentally, if the father really was a violent person who had struck their mother, why did the original court come to the decision that it did?
Originally posted by WorkingClassMan
The only person we know who has done anything wrong here is the mother & her mother so where do people get off defending her & attacking the innocent party AKA DAD?
Originally posted by Annee
It is Italy. It could be a very conservative religious area of Italy.
The mother could have had an affair - - - and courts found her unfit because of it.
The decision may not be in the best interest of the children - - - but in the best interest of a religious based judge.
Originally posted by nixie_nox
It is hard to take you seriously when you want to keep applying you personal bias
You also don't know who could afford the better lawyer, most likely him. Girls should be kept with their mothers, especially a girl at the very awkward age of 15, who is developing, most certainly should be, and is better off in Austrailia than the male dominated society of Italy.
Originally posted by Annee
You do not know that the dad is innocent. Maybe he bribed the judge. Maybe its a culturally paternal controlled area.
this is why real men don't take most of the women seriously. logic is beyond their reach....
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by ollncasino
Yet the original court, which was in possession of more facts and evidence than you or I, decided that the children's interests were served best by the father having custody.
Incidentally, if the father really was a violent person who had struck their mother, why did the original court come to the decision that it did?
It is Italy. It could be a very conservative religious area of Italy.
The mother could have had an affair - - - and courts found her unfit because of it.
The decision may not be in the best interest of the children - - - but in the best interest of a religious based judge.
Originally posted by ollncasino
Your anti-father bias is clear.
Originally posted by Kryties
All I am seeing is a lot of probables, maybes and what ifs. The fact is neither side of this argument has all the facts, nor does either side of this argument know for sure what either the mother or father are thinking.
Wait for the outcome of the Italian court case that will ensue from this, I think that will shine a lot more light on the subject with all the media scrutiny now upon it.
Originally posted by ollncasino
Originally posted by Annee
You do not know that the dad is innocent. Maybe he bribed the judge. Maybe its a culturally paternal controlled area.
Maybe the mother just made it up in a desperate attempt to keep the children she abducted?
Besides, I image that the female Australian family law judge who heard the case would be shocked that you are accusing her of being bribed by the father.
Originally posted by nixie_nox
reply to post by Annee
Italy is very much known for being the good ol boys club.