Pegomastax dinosaur had a beak, bristles and fangs , page 1

Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times

Topic started on 3-10-2012 @ 11:27 PM by DaesDaemar

Pegomastax dinosaur had a beak, bristles and fangs

www.adelaidenow.com.au

IT had a fanged beak, quills and a face only a mother could love. But this cat-sized dinosaur is causing a sensation among scientists.
The new species of plant-eating dinosaur (though you'd never believe it with those viscious fangs in its mouth) was recently found amid a collection of uncatalogued fossils dug up in southern Africa in the 1960s.

(visit the link for the full news article)

reply posted on 3-10-2012 @ 11:27 PM by DaesDaemar

Just came across this find!

They managed to find this 'hidden' in some other fossils. A very strange looking creature that looks remarkably parrot-like and looks to be yet another link from dinosaurs to birds.

It has a parrot beack with large fangs, but was apparently a plant eater. This is one of the smallest dinosaurs ever found.

www.adelaidenow.com.au
(visit the link for the full news article)

reply posted on 3-10-2012 @ 11:46 PM by Sublimecraft

reply to post by DaesDaemar

Lets throw a picture up of that sucker - remarkable, kinda reminds me of my ex-girlfriend.......

Seriously though, S&F - I enjoy learning about these sorts of things.

reply posted on 3-10-2012 @ 11:59 PM by Blackmarketeer

A face only a mother could love... and even that's iffy.

Still, very avian-like.

reply posted on 4-10-2012 @ 12:08 AM by DaesDaemar

reply to post by Sublimecraft

Thanks, even if the OP wasn't very concise or informative, I really do enjoy any new find like this. There is so much us humans still don't know.

reply posted on 4-10-2012 @ 12:11 AM by Agarta

reply to post by Sublimecraft

LoL you dated her too huh?

Great find OP it truly bring out the nature of the beast.

reply posted on 4-10-2012 @ 08:49 AM by Unity_99

You do realize the scarse hair/feathers on the surface are just a theory. I would imagine its a bird. And Dino's ae big birds. They probably had lots of feathers.

Reptilies, they are not! Too much vascular systems in the bones. They're extremely hot blooded. Like a bird.

edit on 4-10-2012 by Unity_99 because: (no reason given)

reply posted on 4-10-2012 @ 01:05 PM by Raist

I am sort of going to agree that it ate insects like some in the article suggest. I think it might have eaten berries as well. To be honest I think its diet might have been similar to that of a modern raccoon or wild pig. I think it ate more than just leaves having teeth like that.

I would also say they are right in suggesting that the teeth were for defense and also in competing with one another. If they were herd type dinosaurs I would say they aided in the setting up of a pecking order.

I personally think it is an awesome looking little dino.

Raist

edit on 10/4/12 by Raist because: (no reason given)

reply posted on 4-10-2012 @ 01:21 PM by Raist

Here is another drawing of it.

www.sciencedaily.com...

I hope this does not turn out to be another Chinese fake fossil.

They have even fools experts for a time. China (and a few other places) are well known for very realistic fossil fakery.

www.cnngo.com...

www.time.com...

news.bbc.co.uk...

www.science20.com...

www.science20.com...

www.science20.com...

Raist

reply posted on 4-10-2012 @ 01:26 PM by Raist

A bizarre covering of bristles, something like that of a porcupine, likely covered most of the body of Pegomastax, which measured less than two-feet in length and weighed less than a housecat. These bristles first came to light in a similar-sized heterodontosaur, Tianyulong, discovered recently in China and described in the study. Buried in lake sediment and covered by volcanic ash, Tianyulong preserves hundreds of bristles spread across its body from its neck to the tip of its tail.

www.sciencedaily.com...

What a strange yet fantastic dino.

I would love to have one of these little guys running around my house.

Raist

reply posted on 4-10-2012 @ 01:32 PM by DaRAGE

I swear small dinosaurs evolved into the chickens we now eat ;-p

Muhahahahahah

reply posted on 4-10-2012 @ 01:44 PM by Raist

reply to post by DaRAGE

T-Rex was a relative of the chicken.

A comparison by Asara's team of the amino-acid sequence from the T. rex collagen to a database of existing sequences from modern species showed it shared a remarkable similarity to that of chickens.

www.livescience.com...

news.nationalgeographic.com...

Using a variety of techniques, the researchers compared the T. rex and mastodon protein sequences with those of 21 living animals, including ostriches, chickens, and alligators.

Something to consider next time you visit KFC