Red Orb by Sun pic posted by major Malaysian Newspaper Oct 3rd

page: 9
33
<< 6  7  8    10  11 >>

log in

join

posted on Oct, 6 2012 @ 02:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by Sly1one
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
 


www.abovetopsecret.com...

notice how incredibly similar they are...

Thanks! It's most probably lens flare.



I think the one shown in the OP too is nothing but lens flare just like this one is!
edit on 6-10-2012 by OrionHunterX because: (no reason given)




posted on Oct, 6 2012 @ 03:03 AM
link   
reply to post by ngchunter
 


No, there were only 2 ojects there, 2 fire balls, not cloud covers....clouds not made of fire....i dont think so



posted on Oct, 6 2012 @ 06:47 AM
link   
reply to post by Bodhi911
 



Here you go (fairly close to what you requested).

The first video is practically useless. He needed to come in from the left side to block the Sun and the little white dot would have disappeared. If his finger came in from the right you would have seen the reflection of the dot on his finger showing that it's not really "out there".

My camera is junk. It can take video but ridiculously poor quality. Anyone out there can do the finger test as shown in the video I posted to verify.




I think a lot of people here have already decided that it cant be an object near the sun, so they simply fill in the blanks with whatever explaination they find likely.


There are no blanks to fill in. It is what it looks like.



ETA:

Cameras can do funny things with light and reflections. Here is nibiru up close and personal.



edit on 6-10-2012 by DenyObfuscation because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 6 2012 @ 06:58 AM
link   
reply to post by DenyObfuscation
 


Its so interesting to see how different perceptions we all have in this reality.

Thanks for your opinion but Im afraid I cant share it because I believe you are incorrect.

But yeah, there are obviously people posting faked videos on youtube and calling them "undeniable proof" in order to intentionally be debunked and create the opinion in the viewer that no real object exists. Actually this thread on ATS serves the same purpose, weather or not the OP intended it to.

At least you recognize your video as fake, but you are making the mistake to believe that all of them are fake, thereby falling into the trap that has been have designed for your mind.

This tactic is also used with chemtrails and UFO's and Im guessing you dont see those either.

edit on 6-10-2012 by Bodhi911 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 6 2012 @ 07:23 AM
link   
reply to post by Bodhi911
 



Thanks for your opinion but Im afraid I cant share it because I believe you are incorrect.

Incorrect about what? Obviously you may hold any opinion you wish but what can you demonstrate?

I posted the "Undeniable Proof" video to show what these others do not. If you can move nibiru in the sky like that it shows it's in the camera, not in the sky. That video was not posted to be debunked. It was posted to show how these others are bunk.

People that don't know what they are seeing can be easily deceived. Maybe you could post a video demonstrating the reality of this that passes a properly done finger test? Probably not.



posted on Oct, 6 2012 @ 07:41 AM
link   
reply to post by DenyObfuscation
 


Yeah I understood that. Perhaps you will find a video on youtube where the author does the finger thing like you require, and where he will move the camera to demonstrate its not a camera effect. But even if such a video shows up, how will you know its not computer generated?

I guess it comes down to your personal perception in the end. People film these things because they see something in the sky, and they are not expecting everybody to doubt them. But if I get a clear shot of the object myself, I will do what you suggested in this thread. I mean, why not?

edit on 6-10-2012 by Bodhi911 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 6 2012 @ 08:32 AM
link   
reply to post by Bodhi911
 


Have you seen this thread?


www.abovetopsecret.com...

The orb is on the opposite side of sun. It would make sense that it would be in a different position in America than Malaysia?
edit on 6-10-2012 by maya27 because: add link



posted on Oct, 6 2012 @ 09:32 AM
link   
reply to post by maya27
 


I took pics yesterday of "it" on opposite sides of the Sun only moments apart.



It's simply lens flare. Changing the camera angle changes the location of the flare. Take a camera and try it yourself.



posted on Oct, 6 2012 @ 09:57 AM
link   
Didn't Brian Williams of NBC state that this was supposed to be seen next year (2013) around November?!!
Jeez, it still looks like Elenine (El= GOD, e= extinction, nine= curse of Egypt/darkness) is happening a little early.
Is the show REVOLUTION a preview for all of this? Questions, questions and many more questions!!!



posted on Oct, 6 2012 @ 11:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE

Originally posted by ngchunter

Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
Here is a decent new video, doesn't appear to be a lens flare:

Quite right. It's a filter flare.


Care to eloborate without any emotional triggers? There are obviously images in the video that move with the camera - which are lens flares, whereas the one in question remains stationary, not the definition of a lens flare.

Right, it's a filter flare.



posted on Oct, 6 2012 @ 11:28 AM
link   

Originally posted by Yule C Mann
Didn't Brian Williams of NBC state that this was supposed to be seen next year (2013) around November?!!
Jeez, it still looks like Elenine (El= GOD, e= extinction, nine= curse of Egypt/darkness) is happening a little early.
Is the show REVOLUTION a preview for all of this? Questions, questions and many more questions!!!

What are you talking about??



posted on Oct, 6 2012 @ 03:27 PM
link   
The lack of common sense surrounding these Nibiru pictures boggles ones mind.

Consider that there are thousands of observatories. There are tens of thousands if not more amateur astronomers. There are universities, and agencies who study space. And yet, none of these sources with decent telescopes and filters can seem to capture an image of Nibiru. However, cheap cell phones seem to have no problem coming up with an abundance of pictures of this "killer planet."

The sun is clearly visible to all. If there were a huge body by the sun, it would also be clearly visible to all. Yet only singular people or supposedly in this case, a small group of eyewitnesses could see it. Why is it invisible to the majority of the populace?


Why can't ONE amateur astronomer who studies the sun get a photo of this? Why isn't there any reliable photos?

Because it doesn't exist. The sheer lunacy of believing this exists ranks right up there with believing the world is flat. Of course, there is a society that firmly believe that the world indeed IS flat, so I guess I shouldn't be surprised that people ignore all the common sense aspects of such sightings, so they could come up with a reasonable answer. Other than a mystery planet is sneaking by and only a few select individuals can see it.



posted on Oct, 6 2012 @ 04:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by maya27
reply to post by Bodhi911
 


Have you seen this thread?


www.abovetopsecret.com...

The orb is on the opposite side of sun. It would make sense that it would be in a different position in America than Malaysia?
edit on 6-10-2012 by maya27 because: add link


Yes, good point, Northern Hemisphere and Southern Hemisphere viewers would see the same object on different sides of the Sun.



posted on Oct, 6 2012 @ 04:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by fleabit
The lack of common sense surrounding these Nibiru pictures boggles ones mind.

Consider that there are thousands of observatories. There are tens of thousands if not more amateur astronomers. There are universities, and agencies who study space. And yet, none of these sources with decent telescopes and filters can seem to capture an image of Nibiru. However, cheap cell phones seem to have no problem coming up with an abundance of pictures of this "killer planet."

The sun is clearly visible to all. If there were a huge body by the sun, it would also be clearly visible to all. Yet only singular people or supposedly in this case, a small group of eyewitnesses could see it. Why is it invisible to the majority of the populace?


Why can't ONE amateur astronomer who studies the sun get a photo of this? Why isn't there any reliable photos?

Because it doesn't exist. The sheer lunacy of believing this exists ranks right up there with believing the world is flat. Of course, there is a society that firmly believe that the world indeed IS flat, so I guess I shouldn't be surprised that people ignore all the common sense aspects of such sightings, so they could come up with a reasonable answer. Other than a mystery planet is sneaking by and only a few select individuals can see it.


Ya, like Eugene Shoemaker, guy dies in a car accident one day, and his lab burns down the next. What are the chances???

Here is a great youtube video that shows all the murdered astronomers who were studying deep space objects and had the potential to know about Planet X:




posted on Oct, 6 2012 @ 04:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE

Originally posted by maya27
reply to post by Bodhi911
 


Have you seen this thread?


www.abovetopsecret.com...

The orb is on the opposite side of sun. It would make sense that it would be in a different position in America than Malaysia?
edit on 6-10-2012 by maya27 because: add link


Yes, good point, Northern Hemisphere and Southern Hemisphere viewers would see the same object on different sides of the Sun.


But Malaysia is in the Northern Hemisphere.



posted on Oct, 6 2012 @ 06:32 PM
link   
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
 


As has already been explained to you there was nothing mysterious regarding Shoemaker's death. I have also found no information regarding his lab burning down. I have already asked for you to provide this information in the past and you failed to do so.



posted on Oct, 6 2012 @ 06:48 PM
link   
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
 


I've looked all over for info on his lab burning down the day after he died and I can't find anything. So can you please show me some links to the info. Thanks



posted on Oct, 6 2012 @ 07:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by Ophiuchus 13
reply to post by wmd_2008
 


Is there proof it doesn't exist?
and also if you can please answer this question with your all: Are the ANNUNAKI made up beings to you wmd_2008?
edit on 10/5/12 by Ophiuchus 13 because: (no reason given)


ANYTHING to do with Nibiru is made up and that's a FACT!!!



posted on Oct, 7 2012 @ 06:58 AM
link   
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
 


The only information that suggests something neferious about Gene Shoemaker's death and something burning down that I can find is this video here:

youtu.be...

A 6.35 minute video that is factually wrong (trying to show that the planet's orbits have shifted, with the proof being solar satellite images over a 12 year period, ignoring that the satellite changes orientation, and that the photo's are taken at different times of the year, with the Earth's position around the sun being different during those times, and because all the planets around the sun have a inclination to the solar plane, is ignoring that fact which will cause the planets to appear in different positions in the sky. So the video maker is either very ignorant about astronomy.....or is preying on those who don't know anything about astronomy).

Gene Shoemaker was not a astronomer. He was a geologist. His WIFE was the astronomer, Carolyn Shoemaker. She's still alive at the ripe old age of 83.

The only "lab" that burned down was Mount Stromlo Observatory in 2003, due to the 2003 Canberra Brushfires. Even though it burned down:


All but one of the telescopes, the workshops, the design offices, the administration offices and the library and archives were destroyed. Fortunately, the offices of astronomers and students, the lecture rooms and the computer laboratories survived, so staff were able to be back on site two weeks after the fire.


Gene Shoemaker died in 1997. So much for "The Next Day".

Many of the astronomers dying that are cited by these stories are over 60 years of Age. Statistically speaking, their deaths are not all that mysterious.

As far as "because they were looking for Planet X", the "Planet X" they were looking for (the ones that were, many are cited that were NOT looking for anything like that), was a possible planet beyond Pluto, orbiting beyond Pluto, and not coming into the inner solar system (IE NOT NIBIRU).



posted on Oct, 7 2012 @ 10:05 AM
link   
reply to post by eriktheawful
 


Thanks for the info because I couldn't find anything that said his lab burned down the next day after he died and his death didn't seem that mysterious just tragic.





new topics
top topics
 
33
<< 6  7  8    10  11 >>

log in

join