Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Red Orb by Sun pic posted by major Malaysian Newspaper Oct 3rd

page: 8
33
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join

posted on Oct, 5 2012 @ 03:41 PM
link   
S and F to the OP

Errr..
...

Nibiru Second Sun & Planet X are not on its way... BUT WE ARE!



Go Figure




posted on Oct, 5 2012 @ 03:55 PM
link   
reply to post by Ophiuchus 13
 


OK. For the moment can we talk about those who saw it and the pics we have of what the writer says they saw?

The pic from the OP, not the halo but the other one. May I ask what you believe that to be?



posted on Oct, 5 2012 @ 03:58 PM
link   
reply to post by DenyObfuscation
 


Yes, I dont know what it is



posted on Oct, 5 2012 @ 04:02 PM
link   
reply to post by Ophiuchus 13
 


Fair enough. Have you compared the pic in the OP with the one I posted? Do you see a similarity?

edit on 5-10-2012 by DenyObfuscation because: was going to add but didn't



posted on Oct, 5 2012 @ 04:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by Ophiuchus 13
 


Fair enough. Have you compared the pic in the OP with the one I posted? Do you see a similarity?


Yes somewhat I have and do see similarities. I must add though I do feel the ANNUNAKI are real, have came here and will be back.



posted on Oct, 5 2012 @ 04:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by leeangqi
S and F to the OP

Errr..
...

Nibiru Second Sun & Planet X are not on its way... BUT WE ARE!



Go Figure


Great! Sorry for the mistake, but welcome to the party!

May I ask who are you?



posted on Oct, 5 2012 @ 04:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by DerepentLEstranger

Originally posted by ngchunter

Originally posted by DerepentLEstranger
reply to post by DenyObfuscation
 

leaves? [ ps your picture has nothing to do either]

lol sundogs
the increase in sightings being possibly indicative of changes in the atmosphere.

1-...a sundog in front of a tree? Really?


also possible reason for the excessive lens flare memeing here

2-Then what's the reason for the excessive sundog memeing here?


don't want to do any due diligence either huh?

3-I'd say providing a photo of the same kind of lens flare in front of some trees is pretty darn good due diligence that it's not a sundog, comet, fireball, planet, or any other real object or atmospheric phenomenon.


lol thanks for you and nghunter posting
now we all know chemtrails *cough* geo-engineering may be involved.

keep up the "good work"


4-Not sure what you're trying to imply there.



1- no silly the black dots in front of the sun is what i'm refering to see reply to DenyObfuscation

See the thread topic. It's about what is actually a lens flare. The same kind of lens flare occurs in DenyObfuscation's photo IN FRONT OF THE TREES!

Now stop obfuscating the thread topic.


2- no such thing, you just made it up, probably to trip me or other readers up, and confuse matters muddy the waters even more

No, you really are on some kind of strange sundog meme when the thread's topic is about what is actually a lens flare. Software for generating artificial sundog images has nothing to do with the topic.


4-oh yes you dooooo see 2
edit on 5-10-2012 by DerepentLEstranger because: replaced cartman with DenyObfuscation

No, I don't, spell it out for me.



posted on Oct, 5 2012 @ 04:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by ngchunter
1-See the thread topic. It's about what is actually a lens flare.
2-Now stop obfuscating the thread topic.
3-No, I don't, spell it out for me.


1-lol get a clue, the TOPIC is


Red Orb by Sun pic posted by major Malaysian Newspaper Oct 3rd

no seriously get a clue, and help while you're at it.

2-lol, isn't that precisely what you're doing here?

3-
see 1 and 2



posted on Oct, 5 2012 @ 05:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by DerepentLEstranger

Originally posted by ngchunter
1-See the thread topic. It's about what is actually a lens flare.
2-Now stop obfuscating the thread topic.
3-No, I don't, spell it out for me.


1-lol get a clue, the TOPIC is


Red Orb by Sun pic posted by major Malaysian Newspaper Oct 3rd


Yes, the photo of which... is a lens flare of the same type shown by DenyObfuscation. Sundogs have nothing to do with it.


2-lol, isn't that precisely what you're doing here?

No, but why are you?



posted on Oct, 5 2012 @ 06:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by Ophiuchus 13

Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by Ophiuchus 13
 


Fair enough. Have you compared the pic in the OP with the one I posted? Do you see a similarity?


Yes somewhat I have and do see similarities. I must add though I do feel the ANNUNAKI are real, have came here and will be back.


Speaking of which, whatever happened to 1-Annanuki Bastard? He used to chime in on these types of threads, and was good for a laugh as opposed to these more uptight types, haven't seen him post for quite some time.



posted on Oct, 5 2012 @ 07:14 PM
link   
Hi all, I am a Malaysian. Dont simply assume we are fools. Yes Nibiru exist and we see it here. here the pics. i place it according to latest above. Open up ur eyes.





s1075.photobucket.com...



edit on 5-10-2012 by Jelita because: spelling



posted on Oct, 5 2012 @ 07:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by Jelita
Hi all, I am a Malaysian. Dont simply assume we are fools. Yes Nibiru exist and we see it here. here the pics. i place it according to latest above. Open up ur eyes.





s1075.photobucket.com...¤t=DSCN7230_zpsb711c808.jpg



edit on 5-10-2012 by Jelita because: spelling


Thank you for your input. In my opinion these pictures are less than stellar examples of PX, but just because they may not be PX certainly does not lessen the validity of the PX hypothesis.

BTW, you may want to examine these videos before throwing in with any one faction:

edit on 5-10-2012 by PlanetXisHERE because: correction



posted on Oct, 5 2012 @ 08:55 PM
link   
Here is a decent new video, doesn't appear to be a lens flare:




posted on Oct, 5 2012 @ 09:17 PM
link   
reply to post by Jelita
 


No, that's called "cloud cover" with variable levels of thickness.



posted on Oct, 5 2012 @ 09:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
Here is a decent new video, doesn't appear to be a lens flare:

Quite right. It's a filter flare.



posted on Oct, 5 2012 @ 09:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by ngchunter

Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
Here is a decent new video, doesn't appear to be a lens flare:

Quite right. It's a filter flare.


Care to eloborate without any emotional triggers? There are obviously images in the video that move with the camera - which are lens flares, whereas the one in question remains stationary, not the definition of a lens flare.



posted on Oct, 5 2012 @ 09:28 PM
link   
Oops, I posted this on the wrong thread, here it is again:

Here is another good video I just noticed, observe how the small white orb remains as the Sun goes behind the cloud, whereas a len flare should disappear when the main light source is blocked.

Also, you can easily see the small white orb go behind the cloud, can someone please tell me how a lens flare can move behind a cloud? Kind of defies logic, doesn't it?





posted on Oct, 5 2012 @ 10:51 PM
link   
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
 




Also, you can easily see the small white orb go behind the cloud, can someone please tell me how a lens flare can move behind a cloud?

BEHIND the cloud? How do you conclude that a white orb is BEHIND a white cloud? That kinda defies logic.

If the people who make these videos would do this simple test we wouldn't have these videos.



posted on Oct, 6 2012 @ 02:13 AM
link   
reply to post by DenyObfuscation
 


Its easy to see the difference between a lens flare and a real object in my opinion. The newspaper article behind this thread has a photo of a lens flare. Your video also show a lens flare.

But back to your request. Here you go (fairly close to what you requested). But to be honest, after reading this thread, I think a lot of people here have already decided that it cant be an object near the sun, so they simply fill in the blanks with whatever explaination they find likely.


July 21:st 2012





Here is another one where the guy doesnt do the finger test, but its not a lens flare since it doesnt move when the camera moves (although you do have examples of lens flares as well as he moves the camera, as well as other artifacts from filming through a glass window). The object is about the same size and location as in the first video.

July 4:th 2012





edit on 6-10-2012 by Bodhi911 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 6 2012 @ 02:49 AM
link   
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
 


Its interesting that your video shows the object being left of the sun. My videos shows it as being on the right side. Can you find out when your video was created (not the same as the upload date to youtube)?

edit on 6-10-2012 by Bodhi911 because: (no reason given)





new topics

top topics



 
33
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join