It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Turns out the company that leased Defense Distributed its 3-D printer doesn’t see it that way. In a letter to Wilson dated Sept. 26, the legal counsel for Stratasys Inc. informed Wilson that it was cancelling his lease of the company’s uPrint SE printer. “It is the policy of Stratasys not to knowingly allow its printers to be used for illegal purposes,” the company wrote, noting that Wilson lacked a federal license for manufacturing firearms.
Wilson has maintained that he doesn’t need a license, because he’s not planning to sell the weapon. But Stratasys was not impressed. Wired's Danger Room blog reports that the company’s representatives showed up at his door to seize the device.
link
For your information, per provisions of the Gun Control Act (GCA) of 1968, 18 U.S.C. Chapter 44, an unlicensed individual may make a “firearm” as defined in the GCA for his own personal use, but not for sale or distribution.
Originally posted by phroziac
Hell i even know a cop with an ffl that thinks its illegal to make your own gun...
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Originally posted by phroziac
Hell i even know a cop with an ffl that thinks its illegal to make your own gun...
Which finely illustrates the dangers of making the law up as you go.
Not just an idiot FFL holder but a cop no less.
I'd rather these people simply said they didnt know or were unsure rather than hopelessly believe the wrong answer with 100% conviction.
Originally posted by Recouper
If you're going to make guns, for crying out loud, keep it on the down low. But I can't help but wonder, why guns? Of all the things you could think up (kinda literally), why something as common and as easily obtainable as guns?