It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Reply to "ATS is a LAB and we are the RATS" thread......

page: 2
4
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 3 2012 @ 12:48 AM
link   

Originally posted by Bodhi911

Yes, members make posts and answers threads and government agencies read and post here by being members.

Its pretty obvious since you have some posters who never see any conspiracy, who are very active in certain threads, and are here every day for many hours. These guys are very good at rhetorics.

I think Phage is one of them for example.


edit on 3-10-2012 by Bodhi911 because: (no reason given)

If i remember right in his introduction thread he said that he is a paid gov. expert sent here to take on nibru info among other topics.
no b.s.
edit on 3-10-2012 by deadeyedick because: (no reason given)




posted on Oct, 3 2012 @ 12:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by AQuestion
reply to post by cavalryscout
 


Dear cavalryscout,

They are not glued to their computers, that is what algorithms are for. Recently, someone in Valencia, California was questioned regarding his statements that he was going to kill kids at a local school, his post was a comment on some ESPN website. It turned out to be a garbage threat. How do you figure it was picked up? Yes, we are monitored on social networks and everywhere else on the web.


Or... Some civilian on that site dropped a dime.

Sure, certain topics of interest are monitored after being picked out of the "noise" by various means, but the ptb don't really NEED to devote a ton of resources to picking up things like this. Enough citizens will inform on others for a variety of reasons and motivations and do the job for them.



posted on Oct, 3 2012 @ 01:20 AM
link   
Simple question here.

Why couldn't you just reply to the thread in the thread itself?

Why make a new one?

Waste of board space?
edit on 3-10-2012 by selfharmonise because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 3 2012 @ 01:23 AM
link   
reply to post by 35Foxtrot
 


Dear 35Foxtrot,



Sure, certain topics of interest are monitored after being picked out of the "noise" by various means, but the ptb don't really NEED to devote a ton of resources to picking up things like this. Enough citizens will inform on others for a variety of reasons and motivations and do the job for them.


LOL. Everything is monitored and run through computer models. Why wouldn't they do that, wouldn't you? Do you not understand that you have to be pretty smart to get hired by the FBI, CIA and other such organizations? How many millions of phones were tapped without warrants? How many millions are on watch lists (not no fly lists). Just understand this, how many people have security clearances and use the internet, how many of them are monitored? That means the sites they are on are monitored.

By definition, if they are monitoring me, they see you. It is a very simple logic and quite true. It doesn't take all the resources you think, it takes very little in this day and age. A simple algorithm that seeks uses Boolean logic to find patterns reduces the number of posts you actually have to look at. There is also a NSA whistle-blower who public stated that his program to do such things was used within the USA and that is why he became a whistle-blower.



posted on Oct, 3 2012 @ 01:30 AM
link   

Originally posted by AQuestion

LOL. Everything is monitored and run through computer models. Why wouldn't they do that, wouldn't you? Do you not understand that you have to be pretty smart to get hired by the FBI, CIA and other such organizations? How many millions of phones were tapped without warrants? How many millions are on watch lists (not no fly lists). Just understand this, how many people have security clearances and use the internet, how many of them are monitored? That means the sites they are on are monitored.



Exactly...

From: New York Times.

edit on 10/3/2012 by Dustytoad because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 3 2012 @ 01:33 AM
link   
Did you just create a whole new thread for the purpose of replying to an existing thread, or am I missing something here?



posted on Oct, 3 2012 @ 01:33 AM
link   
reply to post by Dustytoad
 


Dear Dustytoad,

That is the guy I was referencing. Thanks.



posted on Oct, 3 2012 @ 01:44 AM
link   
If you wish to respond to a thread, you can do so in the thread itself. You don't create a "reply thread".

Please add your thoughts here.

Thank you.

Thread closed.



posted on Oct, 3 2012 @ 01:45 AM
link   
Please discuss this in the original thread on the subject, as linked to in the OP

Closed



new topics

top topics



 
4
<< 1   >>

log in

join