It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AndyMayhew
Exactly This is no longer the Middle Ages and the idea of states based on religion are as relevant as burning elderly women at the stake, panicing when there's an eclipse and bathing once a year.
Originally posted by Flavian
reply to post by Corruption Exposed
Wasn't statehood actually agreed in the Assembly in 1998 / 1999? Just that nothing has happened since then for various reasons.
Which makes this subsequent vote even more ridiculous. Seriously, just give them their state. Although, frankly, i totally agree with Earthcitizen. Should all live together in one happy state (ok - wishful thinking). However, as a solution, make a single state and put the Baha'i faith in charge. Hard to see how anyone could fall out with a Baha'i!
Originally posted by miniatus
Any other sources besides the guardian? .. when I google for this I'm not finding anything I'd consider reputable, and at least in my experience.. guardian has been pretty out there at times with their claims.
What had ATS become today???
A member with an obvious anti-american and anti-jew agenda allowed to spew his hatred here, with a supposed 'PRIVATE MEMO' seen by journalists, and members naively twisted to discuss on this figment of imagination?
reply to post by 00nunya00
Yeah, screw New York City.
Originally posted by Krono
reply to post by Corruption Exposed
Ah, the American Administration is at it again....or is it the Israeli lobby?
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
Originally posted by Krono
reply to post by Corruption Exposed
Ah, the American Administration is at it again....or is it the Israeli lobby?
My opinion is that it is both of the organizations that you mentioned.
I'm very confident about my guess, but I would put most the blame on the Israeli lobby.
Originally posted by Morg234
reply to post by 00nunya00
Yeah, screw New York City.
...Which obviously would never be described as the multi-cultural capital of the world[...]
Originally posted by 00nunya00
Originally posted by Morg234
reply to post by 00nunya00
Yeah, screw New York City.
...Which obviously would never be described as the multi-cultural capital of the world[...]
Why? I think NYC is considered by most in the world as the "multi-cultural capital of the world." Why do you disagree? Where would you suggest as an alternative?
Originally posted by babloyi
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
Hey EarthCitizen!
The difference here is that for the Palestinians in general, it isn't a religious issue, while for the jews (at least the practising non-orthodox ones), it is. Palestinians aren't saying "We want our own country because God gave it to us!" They're saying "We want our own country because we live (or lived, in the case of refugees) there, and don't like being occupied.
"Palestinian" isn't synonymous with "Muslim". There are Christian Palestinians, Muslim Palestinians (further divided into Shia and Sunni Palestinians), and there were even Jewish (native to the area, not immigrants) Palestinians, however that last group obviously was most happily taken in by Israel.