Missing April Jones: Search Intensifies, page 5


Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 24 times


reply posted on 8-10-2012 @ 04:06 AM by stumason
reply to post by ReptileSkinShoes



Again, you don't know squat from the rest of us, therefore it is rather daft to assume the "no evidence", especially as he has been charged and, as has now been released, remanded in custody (which means he is either a flight risk or a risk to others).. They must have evidence for the CPS to push like this.

Mark Bridger remanded in Custody over Murder charge


reply posted on 8-10-2012 @ 04:12 AM by ReptileSkinShoes
reply to post by stumason



Not really , i mean , they didnt want to let him go so they asked for permission to keep him longer , THAT time was running out so they`ve charged him , it kind of makes sense when we`re talking about the extremely unreliable police service in britain. This was probably incase he tried to leave the country.

Plus , going on what they`ve said they already knew who they wanted to finger for this , and Sky News (especially Kay Burley) has destroyed any chance of being told information since all they do is interrogate people like they have some kind of authority over the public.
edit on 8-10-2012 by ReptileSkinShoes because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 8-10-2012 @ 05:31 AM by VonDoomen
reply to post by Silcone Synapse



questioning a man with power tools? Because he happened to own a vehicle that looked similar to the one mentioned in the story? Do you have any idea how idiotic that sounds? I am all for justice, but you need a bit more proof before threatening to use powertool's on someone


reply posted on 8-10-2012 @ 05:56 AM by VonDoomen
reply to post by purplemer



Thank you!

This thread is full of irrational people. Its like we have our own little media circus here.


reply posted on 8-10-2012 @ 07:23 AM by stumason
reply to post by ReptileSkinShoes



Er, no. It's not the Police who decide what, if any, charges are brought. It is the CPS, an entirely separate body and they only send cases to court which have a reasonable chance of conviction.

They would never charge someone, then request they be remanded in custody simply to gain more time, otherwise the guys lawyer would have a field day at the Magistrates hearing and have it thrown out.

If the Police wanted more time, they would release him on Police bail and then re-arrest later, far easier and less paperwork, plus they don't have to involve the lawyers at the CPS.

You and others are displaying a lack of knowledge and are making assumptions (and we all know assumptions are the mother of all fudge ups) when it comes to how the law works.


reply posted on 8-10-2012 @ 08:59 AM by TheMaverick
reply to post by stumason



stumason completely correct, of course they have strong evidence on this guy, you don't get murder charges brought on a high profile case like this, unless they have something, the CPS don't do this lightly, and as to not ruin the case, they keep it in-house till trial day.

Plus with the guy refusing to talk to anyone, so it's vital they keep all evidence under wraps, i also suspect they believe there is a accomplice in this.

Were all find out soon enough.



reply posted on 8-10-2012 @ 09:01 AM by Flavian
Originally posted by stumason
reply to
post by ReptileSkinShoes



Er, no. It's not the Police who decide what, if any, charges are brought. It is the CPS, an entirely separate body and they only send cases to court which have a reasonable chance of conviction.

They would never charge someone, then request they be remanded in custody simply to gain more time, otherwise the guys lawyer would have a field day at the Magistrates hearing and have it thrown out.

If the Police wanted more time, they would release him on Police bail and then re-arrest later, far easier and less paperwork, plus they don't have to involve the lawyers at the CPS.

You and others are displaying a lack of knowledge and are making assumptions (and we all know assumptions are the mother of all fudge ups) when it comes to how the law works.


This is correct concerning Criminal charges in the UK (as opposed to Civil charges). Moreover, the CPS may actually drop, even if they possibly have enough evidence, if they think a conviction does not have a reasonable chance of success.

Therefore, the fact that he has been charged suggests they have not only enough evidence to charge him, but also enough evidence to gain a conviction. This is significant and i admit it is not what i was expecting. If i am honest, i was fully expecting him to be released owing to the seemingly compromised investigation (media intrusion, etc).

I still feel there is something not quite right with this but i have to admit it looks like i was wrong. The parents need closure one way or the other, so if it was him, i truly hope he admits where the body is / what happened to her. I am not hopeful though. At the end of the day, if he is guilty he will gain nothing by showing where a body may be hidden.


reply posted on 8-10-2012 @ 05:07 PM by thePharaoh
reply to post by stumason



how can you not remember....when they found the girls body IN the house after the 3rd search..last month mate

i`ll get a link.....here...her name was Tia Sharp....her grandmothers boyfriend was let out on bail...then they issued a manhunt.....

news.sky.com...

this is why they charged him....public interest
edit on 8-10-2012 by thePharaoh because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 8-10-2012 @ 05:34 PM by CX
reply to post by thePharaoh



Yep, that was main news for a while, how they....and the dogs missed her i'll never know.

CX.


reply posted on 11-10-2012 @ 06:25 AM by Flavian
reply to post by CX



It was only his initial hearing the other day to establish whether he would be remanded, etc, and to read the charges against him. Therefore i would suggest his trial would not be for a few weeks yet as best, more likely a few months.

That is how the judicial process is supposed to work anyway although recently it seems to have developed a life of its own!


reply posted on 19-11-2012 @ 05:16 PM by Anthony2
Originally posted by Flavian
I still feel there is something not quite right with this but i have to admit it looks like i was wrong. The parents need closure one way or the other, so if it was him, i truly hope he admits where the body is / what happened to her. I am not hopeful though. At the end of the day, if he is guilty he will gain nothing by showing where a body may be hidden.


I share your feeling that something is not quite right. I live not that many miles from where April was taken, they are said to be still looking and still nothing found, but even here in the local news there isn't anything substantive any more - there are still items intended to keep it in people's minds but nothing that might help anyone to find her. Something that sounded like a lead, to me, was reported by the local paper that a couple in a white/silver van were on the North Pembrokeshire coast, asking children questions earlier on the same day she was abducted. There were a couple of other incidents reported in Carmarthenshire in the same month, describing a similar van. Having said that, I was out on a country lane the other day for about 20 minutes and counted 3 white vans passing. There are a lot of them round here.

I've also been looking into Machynlleth a bit, and a lot of very interesting artistic activities, also "green" activities, go on in and around it. Some quite high-profile people either live there or sometimes attend events there. It occurs to me that maybe she was taken out of Machynlleth all together. There are, for instance, private helicopter pads in at least two places within a short distance of the town centre. The volunteer searchers, early on in October, reported that they found a child's purple and pink (April's favourite colour) drinks bottle on the ground in a very remote spot slightly south of the town, but that they were told not to search the nearby buildings because of dangerous structures, also it was bad weather at the time. I hope and trust that those buildings were subsequently searched, but could she have been there and have been whisked away from there?

An elderly gentleman tragically died in a car accident a few days after April disappeared. He lived almost next-door to her and from what was in the press, he may have been a witness and may have already given information to the police when that happened, though it isn't 100% clear.

I wouldn't want to jeapordise the police enquiries in any way, but feel that if people got their heads together, something more might be found.
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Norway To Open Century Old Package
  Posted 19 days ago with 127 member flags
Blame The Real Bad Guys - The Powers Behind Super Powers
  Posted 18 days ago with 65 member flags
19 Yr Old Hostage Gunned Down By Police While Escaping Captor
  Posted 8 days ago with 53 member flags
DHS Source: “It’s going hot”
  Posted 14 days ago with 49 member flags
Police Shoot Another 911 Caller In Her Own Backyard
  Posted 19 days ago with 46 member flags
The Oatmeal\'s Tesla Fundraiser Pushes Past $1.1M
  Posted 15 days ago with 44 member flags