It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
True but no one has recreated our common ancestor.
tooth, it's pretty clear that by now you resort to blatant lying to support your bat# crazy mini-religion. The comments you made above have all been debunked multiple times...yet you simply keep on repeating them like a broken tape recorder.
To pretend evolution isn't recreatable is LAUGHABLE given we use it in modern medicine to accurately predict future outcomes
Hey target food is an observed even, and I'm still waiting for ANYONE including yourself, to debunk it.
Stop trying to dumb down ATS readers and either start educating yourself or simply shut up with your clueless nonsense.
By the way, you saying "there is no proof" doesn't make that proof go away, no matter you wish for it...we don't live in a magical Peter Pan world where you get to clap your hand and all your bat# crazy dreams come true. Evolution is both a scientific theory and a FACT, no matter how much that goes against your irrational beliefs
Either way, you lost all credibility once you tried to argue against a scientific theory by using a MADE UP WORD
In rare situations, target food is identified but in most situations a species is eating almost everyting within a food group which is a sign of phase one hunger. When that is no longer available, a species will pick up another food group that it would not normally eat, this is phase two of hunger. If a species loses that as well, then its off to phase three which is starvation usually eating rocks and dirt and poo.
Aside from some evolutionists claiming that it's wrong, no one has presented anything that has proven it to be wrong. It's observed, and well documented all throughout diets of every species.
So when we look at nature and what we see disagrees with your delusions.... it means somethings wrong with nature which confirms your delusions...
The term bubble boy comes to mind.
The observations have been shared and proven to you to be fact, you can't argue with whats been observed.
Target food isn't observed because it doesn't exist, you made it up!!!
And we have proof of multiple ancestors, it's just that with seemingly all FACTS, you simply ignore it because it doesn't fit your crazy religion
Stick to the joke telling, it seems to be the only thing you have on your side .
Double post...but posting it twice might have a higher chance at it finally sinking in
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by MrXYZ
The observations have been shared and proven to you to be fact, you can't argue with whats been observed.
Target food isn't observed because it doesn't exist, you made it up!!!
And we have proof of multiple ancestors, it's just that with seemingly all FACTS, you simply ignore it because it doesn't fit your crazy religion
Gravity is a made up word, evolution is a a made up word, Target food is observed which says a heck of a lot more than evolution does.
FYI, just because you keep on repeating a MADE UP WORD often enough doesn't make it real
I don't even think you know what "fact" means
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by MrXYZ
Gravity is a made up word, evolution is a a made up word, Target food is observed which says a heck of a lot more than evolution does.
FYI, just because you keep on repeating a MADE UP WORD often enough doesn't make it real
I don't even think you know what "fact" means
Gravity started out as a random word, do you actually think they invented the name before the discovery? Target food is full of objective evidence, perhaps the best is how the squirrel is in phase 2 of hunger and its even explained in the wiki that they go into hunger durring this point. There is so much objective evidence that it's an observed fact.
No, gravity is a fully backed up theory that was given a name. A theory that is backed up by OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE and DETAILED MEASURED CALCULATIONS. Your "target food" on the other hand is a random word you made up, then assigned a random definition to it, never bothered to post any evidence to support your definition and claims, and then pretended it's somehow real and a prerequisite for evolution.
And no, you can't observe a MADE UP WORD
Other than as a post on ATS that is