reply to post by EnochWasRight
First of all Evolution is NOT a scientific theory, it fails the required falsafiability that is the litmus test for judging an investigation to be
scientific. It's also has no predictable value. The only thing that claims to be obvious about it is that it has created over a billion species, but
is not said to be called a creator. I'm sorry but anything that creates over a billion species, is a creator, no matter how you look at it. The
only difference here is evolution claims to be random and unpredictable, while a creator would have intent. I'm sorry but anything that has made
over a billion species didn't do it by accident, and if you believe otherwise, then your just being nieve.
There is obviously intent and direction in all of this, if there wasn't, we would have a much higher failure rate in attempts of life than we do. We
would also have a lot more species that share more things then they do. And just becuase species share parts of DNA is NOT proof of relation. Just
because a monkey can learn to sit at a camp fire and roast marshmallows is also not proof that he is related to humans, it simply means he can
Second, I already stated that DNA findings about ADHD have proven evolution to be false.
It's documented that ADHD changes our DNA, it was brought to my attention that this is an epi-genetic change therfore doesn't apply. I'm sorry but
DNA is ALWAYS part of a living organisim, there is never a point that DNA is just out in La La land or limbo for evolution to make its move. The ADHD
bit is a new find which means that prior to this, evolutionists were recognizing this change as part of evolution. You tell me, is it evolution when
my friends mom smoked while pregnant, passing on ADHD changes into his genetics?: I think not, and will say that pretty soon, all changes will be able
to be recognized for what they truly are and not the mistaken identity of evolution.
I also proved on several other threads that there is more to this picture based on what I coined as "Target food." People were real quick to argue
the differences about diet and how humans have documented it as such. Totaly overlooking and missing the point that it doesn't matter what I claim a
species eats, the fact is it eats what it eats and there is an obvious system to that. Target food is the idea that all species are suppose to have
what you would call, for lack of a better term, Intended food. Yes Intended, it appears that not only are we suppose to have a specific foods, but
there is also an identifiable pattern when this fails, and its consistant with all species, tested and proven. Humans have no target food, this is
apparent because of severel reasons. We have such a large menu, and we eat just about anything, and we eat from all food groups as well. What a
shocker that the bible also tells us that nothing from our home was brought to earth, In other words, our food isn't here. This means that the food
we eat wasn't intended for us, this is why we have a plethora of problems that we do with diet..... all the way to it affecting our health.
The reason we are heading into the 6th largest extinction is because god was also kind enough to claim to have provided us with every living animal,
certainly from other planets. The problem is that you CANT do that. It forces extinctions caused from apex preditors. This rule applys to everything
that was brought here. Scientists are baffled by this but don't realize that it's only because they are first making the wrong assumption that all
this life is suppose to be here to begin with, and its not.
Evolution has been accepted mostly in places where lack of a better explanation is offered. As I explained with ADHD, its obviously wrong. I'm
still waiting for an explanation about how it is that flagellum (gears and sprockets) Evolved.
The chances are too high that all of this came from other planets, just recently they have found yet another planet that could inhabit life.
#1. is 0.92 by comparison to earths size, located Sep 2010 named Gliese 581 g.
#2. is 0.85 by comparison to earths size, located Nov 2011 named Gliese 667C c.
#3 Is 0.81 by comparison to earths size, located Dec 2011 named Kepler 22b.
#4 Is 0.77 by comparison to earths size, located Sep 2011, named HD 85512 b.
#5 Is 0.73 by comparison to earths size, located Sep 2012, named Gilese 163 c.
#6 Is 0.72 by comparison to earths size, located Apr 2007, named Gilese 581 d.