It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A three-judge panel of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled unanimously Friday that protesters may not be required to pass through metal detectors when they gather next month for a rally against a U.S. training academy for Latin American soldiers.
"We cannot simply suspend or restrict civil liberties until the War of Terror is over, because the War on Terror is unlikely ever to be truly over. September 11, 2001, already a day of immeasurable tragedy, cannot be the day liberty perished in this country."
Originally posted by Otts
jsobecky - you say this could be used as a precedent for doing away with security measures at airports. I don't think it has a snowball's chance in hell of happening, and it shouldn't. However, if the court had gone the other way and authorized the use of metal detectors at demonstrations, couldn't that be used as a precedent to further limit and curtail future demonstrations?
Originally posted by verfed
HAAH Jsobecky you got 'em good! Metal detectors are not a breach of your freedom. Whne protesters are carrying signs comparing Bush to Hitler you can expect the authorities to be cautious. "If they're stupid enough to make that sign then they must be stupid enough break some windows or turn over a few cars"