Democrats are War Mongerers with amnesia

page: 1
4
<<   2 >>

log in

join

posted on Oct, 1 2012 @ 09:22 AM
link   
Democrats have had amnesia since the Vietnam war. They do not want to offend their base so they lie until their lies become truth. The media helps them by subliminal brain washing and collective amnesia. The Democrat administrations run into problems when the harsh truth of one simple fact. The shame of doing nothing outweighs the pain of stopping the torture/genocide and torture of millions. Democrats forced us into the Iraq war then got a really bad case of amnesia afterwards. They simply must blame all wars on Republicans no matter the facts. Here is a link that gives a short history of American wars and who the President was. You might be a Republican and not know it.

forums.utsandiego.com...




posted on Oct, 1 2012 @ 09:36 AM
link   
reply to post by jimmiec
 


The paper you are quoting is in error on several things,either due to skewed facts or outright omissions. Wikipedia has this to say about the paper: The merged newspaper was sold to the private investment group Platinum Equity of Beverly Hills on March 18, 2009.[6]

In November 2011, Platinum Equity sold the paper to a company owned by San Diego real estate investor Doug Manchester, known for his support of conservative political causes and his hotel developments (which include the San Diego Marriott Hotel and Marina and the Manchester Grand Hyatt Hotel). The purchase price was reportedly in excess of $110 million.[7]
"Known for his support of conservative political causes" And here we have folks how the news is skewed and untruthful. Anyone can buy a paper or tv station or radio station and spout off they're views and only let that media spout off they're views. Doesn't mean its news. Just views.



posted on Oct, 1 2012 @ 09:42 AM
link   
reply to post by Dimithae
 



Actually the article is very accurate.



posted on Oct, 1 2012 @ 09:42 AM
link   
reply to post by Dimithae
 



Actually the article is very accurate.



posted on Oct, 1 2012 @ 09:42 AM
link   
reply to post by Dimithae
 



Actually the article is very accurate.



posted on Oct, 1 2012 @ 09:42 AM
link   
That does not change the facts. Are you saying that Democrat Presidents were not in office at the start of WW!,WWII,Korean War, Vietnam wars? Elaborate where they got it wrong if so.



posted on Oct, 1 2012 @ 09:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by jimmiec
Democrats forced us into the Iraq war then got a really bad case of amnesia afterwards.




Ok


talk about amnesia...







posted on Oct, 1 2012 @ 09:58 AM
link   
Are you seriously saying that since Democrats were in office during WWI, WWII, Vietnam War and the Korean war that makes them war mongers?

Do you hear that next POTUS. If WWIII starts, make sure not to get involved, especially if you're a democrat. You don't want to be accused of being a war monger and all that jazz.
edit on 1-10-2012 by xEphon because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 1 2012 @ 10:05 AM
link   
reply to post by xEphon
 


Absolutely, Democrats waged war on the world until the Vietnam wars detractors and hollywood became their base. Since then they do not want to offend their base but reality gets in the way, so they goad Republicans into them. They screamed about Iraq's WMD's and that something had to be done before Bush ever took office but left it to a Republican President to clean up their mess.




"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002



posted on Oct, 1 2012 @ 10:20 AM
link   
Blaming World War II on the Democrats...?

Seriously? SERIOUSLY?

On top of that, you want to blame Iraq on the Democrats, too...?

SERIOUSLY?

Allow me to introduce you to a few people - Adolf Hitler and Saddam Hussein and GW Bush. They had a little more to do with those wars then you seem capable of understanding.



posted on Oct, 1 2012 @ 10:30 AM
link   
reply to post by RancorXXX
 


Actually i don't look at any of the wars America fought as an outright war of bad intentions. The Wars the Democrats put us into were just Wars all in all. For the cause of freedom for the world basicly. What upsets me is how they conviently forget/lie about them and claim Republicans are war mongers. Iraq was a war the Democrats wanted yes. Their public statements give credence to the fact. They immediately forgot their statements as soon as the war started so as not to upset their base. Therein lies the problem. I just want the truth told/taught. Not the fairytale lies their base wants to hear.



posted on Oct, 1 2012 @ 08:33 PM
link   
reply to post by jimmiec
 


Seriously?
You're getting your information from a blogger?
Hate to tell you but you are being terribly misinformed.



Reagan escalated the Cold War, accelerating a reversal from the policy of détente, which began in 1979 under President Jimmy Carter following the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Reagan then ordered a massive buildup of the United States Armed Forces.



President Bush formed an international coalition and secured UN approval to expel Iraq. On January 12, 1991, Congress voted approval for a military attack, Operation Desert Storm, by a narrow margin, with Republicans in favor and Democrats opposed.



After the September 11 attacks in 2001 in New York, Bush launched the War on Terrorism, in which the United States led an international coalition invaded Afghanistan,



In 2003, George W. Bush launched the invasion of Iraq, in conjunction with coalition partners, most notably Great Britain. The invasion was described by Bush as being part of the War on Terrorism.
edit on 1-10-2012 by newcovenant because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 1 2012 @ 08:41 PM
link   
reply to post by jimmiec
 


Lets let George put this Thread to bed,



posted on Oct, 3 2012 @ 01:18 PM
link   
reply to post by Tw0Sides
 


Lets let the Democrats keep the thread alive with the truth.



"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002



posted on Oct, 3 2012 @ 01:22 PM
link   
reply to post by newcovenant
 


Meh....

Check the date of the report...




posted on Oct, 3 2012 @ 01:37 PM
link   
Yeah some people do have amnesia from World War 1,World War 2,Korea,Vietnam,Bosnia,Somalia,Pakistan,Yemen,Libya,Syria.

The usage of "this cruise missile is for you" to the dropping of 2 nuclear weapons.

There is a dose of reality.



posted on Oct, 3 2012 @ 01:45 PM
link   
reply to post by neo96
 


Some people? Try 90% of America. The truth is there are bad people in the world and sometimes something has to be done. Obviously since a Republican President ended the Vietnam War it is up to Republicans to do the right thing when the world needs help, or when there is a threat to America. The Democrats can't because their base lives in fairytale land. Unintended consequences are just reality.



posted on Oct, 3 2012 @ 01:49 PM
link   
reply to post by jimmiec
 


Sorry that argument didn't work for the last potus after all:

bush lied and people died!!!!!!!!!



posted on Oct, 3 2012 @ 02:14 PM
link   
reply to post by SLAYER69
 


What does the date of the report have to do with the facts that the GOP are warmongers?
It is widely believed some advance knowledge was there prior to 9/11 (Bush swept the bin Ladens out of the Country while all other air traffic was grounded. Hello?) and that attack was engineered or allowed by some of our own people who wanted to involve us in a war. The GOP was large and in charge. What's that? Bad press? Or do many Americans suspect them of being power and oil hungry war mongers too?



posted on Oct, 3 2012 @ 02:24 PM
link   
reply to post by newcovenant
 


AND?

What does that have to do with Slick Willie firing on terrorist bases in Afghanistan 3 years before 9/11?
One of your provided links simply states and I'll quote it


After the September 11 attacks in 2001 in New York, Bush launched the War on Terrorism, in which the United States led an international coalition invaded Afghanistan,



Meanwhile Billy boy was stirring the pot before any of that happened.

No?





new topics
top topics
 
4
<<   2 >>

log in

join