Originally posted by BlackManINC
In order for this to work they first have to convince us that there is life on other planets in the first place, with a 'find' of some kind,
preferably by a fraud group like NASA since this has to do with space. There is a very high chance this will start with the Mars Curiosity Rover. You
won't need "fiery chariots" to get the bulk of the populace to believe in the ancient astronaut theory, all that is needed is a low key disclosure of
life in space and this will at least get the ball rolling. The "fiery chariots" scenario will come later, but a lot is going to have to happen for
this to come. There is no one way this alien deception will come about.
Continuing on from this post, I have a hypothesis that I am almost certain will play a part in the alien deception, its concerning the Biblical story
of the Nephilim giants in Genesis 6. Lots of bones have purportedly been found over the years that seem to range anywhere from 7 to 12 feet, only many
of them have supposedly been proven a hoax. Some suspect that the reason why we haven't found much if any evidence for these beasts is because its
being covered up, with groups like the Smithsonian Institute as one of the main culprits. Assuming there is a cover up, then the obvious reason we
don't see them displayed in museums, and proven to be the Nephilim of the Bible, is because it would fly in the face of the theory of Evolution and
the overall alien agenda.
The way I see it, if there wasn't anything to the idea of the Nephilim, if its just a pure fairy tale, then we wouldn't be seeing groups like the
History Channel making shows like Ancient Aliens that go out their way to try and convince us that the Nephilim were an "alien race" that "descended
from the sky" and created humans. This is in fact what was shown at the beginning of the movie Prometheus, which was inspired by the Ancient Astronaut
theory, as they pawned these abominations off as our creators from a distant galaxy. As I point out in the quote below from the
Ancient Aliens Debunked thread, the actual text says nothing of
the sort, as anybody should know if they read the passage themselves.
To all those who will dismiss the entire video because he happens to be a Christian and based on this one section, I have yet to see any of you
actually dismiss it with an objective critique, Philips included. It only shows how pathetic you really are when you get annoyed by someone merely
mentioning the Bible, and not just anybody, but Christians in particular. The author was pointing out how they pervert what is said in the Bible to
make it seem like its all about E.T's like they do with all other ancient text. Above all the other blatant lies they state about the Bible, they
assert that the Nephilim are really the "aliens" that "descended from the sky" and created us when the text clearly says nothing of the sort,
elevating this demonic copulation of fallen angels with humans to the level of God. The artificial insemination crap was the shows backhanded way
to diminish the divinity of Jesus and imply that he along with Noah was just another alien creation. By the author being Christian, you should have
known he was going to have a bone to pick with these looney toons for this butchery.
The specific video concerned:
Nephilim - Ancient Aliens Debunked:
Ancient Aliens Debunked (Full Length Movie)
In conclusion, all they are waiting for is a 'find' of some kind from a group like NASA or an archaeological group as I propose here, or both, so that
they can tack on the alien origin of life to their overall theory. They will show the world a few giant skeletons and pawn them off as the "Ancient
Astronauts" that manipulated the DNA of apes and resulted in the creation of modern humans, guiding our "evolution" along, they will say, as this will
give the Evolutionists the chance to explain the DNA code. If this happens along with a literal appearance of "aliens" over every city in "fiery
chariots" as 'SimonPeter' calls them, then this will indeed invalidate the God of the Bible as our creator in the minds of many.
edit on 15-10-2012 by BlackManINC because: (no reason given)
edit on 15-10-2012 by BlackManINC because: (no reason
given)
edit on 15-10-2012 by BlackManINC because: (no reason given)