It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by nerbot
I have been emailed (as have others) the original RAW file which I can confirm HAS NOT been edited to the best of my knowledge.
What you see on this site or uploaded to the internet are 'copies'. Files here have been resized etc to fit the post so WILL have editing software data included in the exif data.
Originally posted by freelance_zenarchist
It's not the original photo, you can email Springer if you'd like a copy.
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by nerbot
OK, JPEG, got it. There's raw the adjective and then there's RAW the format.
Originally posted by Sakrateri
I'm sorry but i cant get past the idea that NaeBabii may just be the "photographer" that took these pictures as she has just got on here and is trying hard to defend them.
Originally posted by HoaxKillerFriend
My current analysis. Best to watch full screen.
I have long quit focusing on specs, background, scenery and EXIF data on the picture. I think this has all been established. No matter how long, or how hard I study, the object, I cannot come to a reasonable conclusion.