Originally posted by StellaByStarLight
reply to post by r2d246
I think you are spot on r2d246. For so long I have wanted to get into the mix. Guess my timidity has hurt in the past. I worked for NASA, roughly
11 years as a project manager. Some of us would chat occasionally about the likelihood or unlikelihood of our being buggered on some of this stuff,
especially the planetary probes and Apollo. Sometimes, I think because we were women, a couple of girlfriends and I that worked there, people
actually paid us MORE mind. But ultimately we'd get shouted down. The main reason for my suspicions, tendency toward disbelief in the reality of
the big projects, had to do with the principals not being very convincing. I met Gene Cernan and I thought he was a con man, VERY UNCONVINCING as a
spaceman. I listened to him talk and thought, "No way this guy went to the moon, NO WAY!". I don't think Cernan could park a car, let alone land a
lunar excursion vehicle and drive a rover. Also, the hostility thing. I always felt that, and still do, the hostility of the conventional view folks
is so much out of proportion to the hoax believers. That is a telltale sign of weakness, aggression. This is so because there is no genuine
alternative. I am yet to declare myself an HB publicly , but and am on the verge of it. I also met Lovell. He yaks like mad, but it is all bull.
I don't think he could pass a college level calculus with a B+. He come across as a C student with the gift of gab. The planetary probe projects
and Apollo are gamed, can't be legitimate.
WOW ARE YOU SERIOUS???
Oh man that's crazy! That's very interesting! Interesting to hear your prospective for sure. So you were you privy to anything that led creedence
for or against that you found in your time there?
Well I just sort of go by the money trail. When I see people who can put together a nearly similar video for a few thousand, and yet the budget on the
apollo project was 100 billion, to me it just doesn't add up.
There' another thing that seems so obvious to me. When they went to the moon the photos and the videos look stagged. The reason being that the video
camera never moves in any significant panning, such as doing a 360 or pointing up. I've never seen even once them do that. That's classic hollywood.
When you watch a movie and are filming a scene they don't do a 360. Why? because you'd see the film crew and lighting obviously. That's exactly the
same with the moon landing.
Another example of the 360. I was at the burningman festival. I did a full 360 many times. My camera was up down round and round. Anyone watching my
video would know that was a true video. And there's a gazillion videos like this.
Another example Someone's at a camp site. They have the video camera. They're filming and keeping the camera rolling... They point this way to show
the lake, then pan this way to show the friends, they walk over hear pan this way to show the tent, pan another way to show there jeep, another way to
show the mountains. It's not a movie shoot where they can only do one little area and then ALWAYS HAVE TO TURN OFF THE CAMERA. Like it's so obvious
they had to turn off the camera after every scene because it's a movie shoot. That's exactly how you film a movie, scene by scene. Heck even most
movies they pan around more than they did with the appollo scene.
And if you watch some of these moon hoax documentaries they're talking about hundreds of issues that aren't properly explained as to how they pulled
it off. some I'm sure they could have an explanation perhaps but I've never ever heard anyone explain all of them. And NEVER from a 3rd party
scientist. It's always some paid NASA hack doing the explaining. And there asnswers are usually half azz.
The other thing I hav a big problem with is this. When they ended the program why would they dismantal "everything". Like everythign was cut up,
gotten rid off etc etc. That makes ZERO SENSE! That only makes sense if you want to hide something. My thought is wouldn't they put everything away
in a safe place, just in case at some point one day you might want to go back? Like if it was real and that's the earths ONLY VEHICLE to go there you
wouldn't destroy it. You'd save it for a rainy day.
Anyway, that's all I have to say for now...and Thanks for sharing.
I know right. I used to be a jerk on here and troll the mars structures threads years ago. I just admitted to it now. 
