It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by r2d246
Missions that do look plausible are ones where they orbit earth, space station, and satellite local and those sent out into far reaches. I think those are probably real.
Originally posted by denver22
Originally posted by r2d246
reply to post by seabhac-rua
Can you show me one moon video where they do a 360 pan with the camera? And or can you show me one video where they point the camera up into space? Like I could be wrong, who knows
Your knowledge of the hassleblad cameras and apollo is very poor. you are wrong we all knows
that the cameras were fixed to the chest...yes the chest.
P.S keep it real ive just woken up...
Originally posted by oldmeatwad
What's hard to believe is that we had enough technology to get us there, but none to do a proper job of documenting it.
The same questions over and over - why no long exposures of the sky? Why no video pans upward or 360 degrees? It's an omission that does not seem plausible. When evidence is put forward, it's either low resolution or far from clear. The only hard evidence is in the form of rocks and mirrors on the moon - both of which could be accomplished using remote technology. It has the earmarks of a spun story and if I was in charge of spending billions of tax payers dollars, I would need a 100% guarantee of success. I could not risk killing american Heros, or having my expensive mission fail. It would be a true epic fail that could have killed the entire project and the hearts and minds of the country.
What's easy to believe is mans greed and how it can manifest itself.
Originally posted by r2d246
They managed to keep the Manhatton Project a secret and that was a big project. Out of all the people working on it, only maybe a dozen people at the top knew what the weapon was and did.
Originally posted by alfa1
Originally posted by salainen
And the original post had absolutely no PROOF that the moon landing was faked, only some speculations on whether it even COULD have been faked.
Or more exactly, speculation that it could have been faked with modern 2012 computer graphics technology.
Nobody yet has attempted to do a fake recreation using 1969 technology.
YOUR JOKING! YOU DON'T WATCH MOVIES???? You've never seen a movie have you? In the 70's they the special effects capability to do starwars. Imitating gravity is like 1920's hollywood special effects.
How did they do these:
Before the moon landings.... Released in 1968 they could do this....