Moon and Rover fakery - Shocking PROOF like never before seen!!!

reply to post by seabhac-rua


The onus is on neither side. Each side presents their respective case, and ultimately the truth shall be told. This is not a court of law, nor anything else remotely like one.

Originally posted by seabhac-rua

Originally posted by r2d246


so the events went something like this:

1 On earth they made it look like a real project.
2 They launched the rocket but the astronauts where not in it.
3 They pulled them out last minute.
4 They maybe even had the moon orbitor part of the rocket blast toward the moon
5 Now when they got to the moon they started playing the movie they had filmed.
6 The moon footage of them orbiting the moon was footage they took on earlier robot rover missions between the US and Russia
7 Then the landing and others was either or starting at the work recorded at the studio or again the rover scenes shot from earlier missions.
8 Then the moon walk was footage shot from the studio.
9 when they recovered the capsol later on from the ocean that has been stagged with the astronuats put in it.

Dude, unless you have some solid evidence, then, as nicely as you have this all figured out, it's just fantasy based on nothing.

Remember the onus is on the hoax theorists to come up with solid irrefutable evidence. Every piece of so called evidence HB's trump has been explained.

You and other HB's seem to walk into every semi plausible pseudo scientific theory thrown out there, and you don't question if your being deceived, it's double standards.

Trust me I'm like 99.9% positive that they did it this way.

reply to post by OptimusSubprime


Not a major issue in the debate really, though it is important for you to be aware. The Russian LRRRs were robotically landed on the moon. Astronauts are not required.

reply to post by seabhac-rua


Can you show me one moon video where they do a 360 pan with the camera? And or can you show me one video where they point the camera up into space? Like I could be wrong, who knows. I personally haven't found one. If someone could show me some video's like that, I might be convinced. But I get the distinct impression at this time that that was because, like any movie, you can't do a 360 or it might expose things like lighting, stage hands, camera men, producers, directors etc etc. But please show me. Or if you can't show me, then at least tell me what your explaination is that they go all the way there and out of ever single video not one offers any panaramic 360 footage, so we an actually see something beyond what apears to be done in a studio???

reply to post by SilentKoala


Cant u spell com mon spell write!!!!

Originally posted by OptimusSubprime
If the moon landing was fake, then how did the mirrors get up there and positioned precisely for the experiments mentioned in the following thread...


Moon Mirrors

Both russia and the US did robot missions in prior years. That would explain a lot of things. Like they could have took videos of when the lunar orbitor was going around. So that would explain that footage. Then they could have planted the mirrors during those robot missions. Also all the tracks that people "claim are seen now" would be explained by the robot rovers driving around; thats' if there real at all!

At the end of the NASA film about Apollo 17, ON THE SHOULDERS OF GIANTS, Cheis Kraft makes the asinine statement that he hoped he'd be around to see our exploration of another solar system. It was his hope that before he died, we moved outside of our own solar system to find "another earth"..


Alpha Centauri is 4 plus light years from earth. How are we going to get there Chris, by way of a wrinkle in time?


Kraft is not stupid and is no one's fool. Statements like these were made over and over with straight faces. Do we really look that dumb. This sort of talk confirms my point, when it came to manned space flight of the day, with little exception, it was and is all about fairy tales.

Originally posted by fleabit

Wow...

Are there still people in the year 2012 that believe the moon landing was faked?

Um.. there is an entire society that firmly believes the the earth is still flat.

So.. yea. No surprise there.

It is flat!!! Look when you go out, and you walk around, other than minor stuff like hills and mountains, you've always walked in one direction haven't you? when you look at a map, there always flat right? the world is flat! think about it. Even when you look at the earth from outer space the edges are rounded by the space within it is flat, like a 2d pancake. No seriously! It's flat, it's not rounded like we've been told.

reply to post by r2d246

Trust me I'm like 99.9% positive that they did it this way.

I won't if you don't mind.

Originally posted by StellaByStarLight
reply to post by OptimusSubprime

 

Not a major issue in the debate really, though it is important for you to be aware. The Russian LRRRs were robotically landed on the moon. Astronauts are not required.

Those would explain a lot too. Like the mirrors, like the tracks, like any other gizmos they claim. I do believe the robots went. Just not the appollo dealy. I think that was a way to siphon money off.

Originally posted by Argyll
reply to post by r2d246

 

Trust me I'm like 99.9% positive that they did it this way.

I won't if you don't mind.

Trust me, you can trust me. I know what happened back then!

reply to post by r2d246

Those would explain a lot too. Like the mirrors, like the tracks, like any other gizmos they claim. I do believe the robots went. Just not the appollo dealy. I think that was a way to siphon money off.

Do you honestly believe that any of the worlds major governments would have to "invent" the moon landings just to syphon money?.....really?

Everyone has the right to be a clown on the internet.....please stop abusing the privilege.

What's hard to believe is that we had enough technology to get us there, but none to do a proper job of documenting it.

The same questions over and over - why no long exposures of the sky? Why no video pans upward or 360 degrees? It's an omission that does not seem plausible. When evidence is put forward, it's either low resolution or far from clear. The only hard evidence is in the form of rocks and mirrors on the moon - both of which could be accomplished using remote technology. It has the earmarks of a spun story and if I was in charge of spending billions of tax payers dollars, I would need a 100% guarantee of success. I could not risk killing american Heros, or having my expensive mission fail. It would be a true epic fail that could have killed the entire project and the hearts and minds of the country.

What's easy to believe is mans greed and how it can manifest itself.

Originally posted by r2d246
Can you show me one moon video where they do a 360 pan with the camera?

You asked that before, try actually reading the thread as it has already been posted - it looks like you are not interested in actually reading a thread, just posting in it.

I would recommend anybody who is interested into Mars Rover, to read Astroengineer's blog.

astroengineer.wordpress.com...

Thats the longest post I have ever read, but also the best. You can call it a high-tech porn and I am believing the author, that this is his true story.

He started to post that back in 2010 here as well, but with all the bashers and know better here, he decided to rather continue his story on his own blog.

Originally posted by seabhac-rua

Originally posted by mazzroth
Ok this is what more than likely happened with the moon landing, the Yanks were positive of getting there and back even through the Val Allens Radiation belt but they were not confident with Hasselblads ability to video the event so they had a contingency plan. This plan involved switching over to a remote desert location and uploading the feeds so the event wasn't marred by poor playback or completely whited out images spoiling the event.

The reasoning behind this ? well with an event so important with the Russians so close to landing rovers on the moon within months they had to have top notch footage which could not be guaranteed, so some big nob made the call to just run with the hoax footage and hence the problems with lighting and numbered rocks which are definitely questionable. These errors out weighed having gone on holidays and not having good snaps to prove it.

This would cover just about everything that sums up the "Moon Landing Conspiracy" I would think.

Nope. Firstly there are no "problems with lighting and numbered rocks" all this has been demonstrated beyond any doubt countless times to be errors, misinterpretations and in some cases deliberate lies by hoax theorists.

Secondly if you think the footage was only way it was proven to the Russians that men walked on the moon then you need to do some learning about the Apollo space program.

Nope ?? is that even a word these days ? and its opinion about the lighting and rocks so don't get all so "self important" here and state you know for a fact !

View of the milky way from the surface of mars..

Originally posted by OptimusSubprime
If the moon landing was fake, then how did the mirrors get up there and positioned precisely for the experiments mentioned in the following thread...


Moon Mirrors

Placing the LRRR mirror on the moon does not require a human on the moon.

Originally posted by Zaphod58
reply to post by r2d246

 

Uh, the stars will look exactly the same from the Moon and Mars as they do from Earth. You have to move a huge distance for their location to change, so anyone looking at them from a video from Mars, would see the same stars, in the same location as they would from anywhere on earth. You would need special instruments to see any difference from Mars. The moon is so close that there isn't a measurable distance.

edit on 9/30/2012 by Zaphod58 because: (no reason given)

ever hear of astrology. If you had a different vantage point within the solar system, the positions of the sun and planets to the stars would be drastically different. If mars was opposite to Venus from the earth, then a shot from mars would show Venus in the opposite constellation.

Originally posted by Zaphod58
reply to post by r2d246

 

Uh, the stars will look exactly the same from the Moon and Mars as they do from Earth. You have to move a huge distance for their location to change, so anyone looking at them from a video from Mars, would see the same stars, in the same location as they would from anywhere on earth. You would need special instruments to see any difference from Mars. The moon is so close that there isn't a measurable distance.

edit on 9/30/2012 by Zaphod58 because: (no reason given)

double post