Real Physics!

page: 3
28
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join

posted on Oct, 1 2012 @ 03:21 PM
link   
reply to post by ubeenhad
 


Thanks but I did try to be real.
That Wave Function symbol is textbook for many years now.
Yes is quite interesting physics which we all had most likely.
I'll check it with my text books if I have too but might be hard to find.
See the video repeats what we already know perhaps but those that
accept the official word might be missing a few hundred years of
effective physics without being the wiser.


I checked as they gave me his life story.
Sines and cosines as any wave so that gives them the right to say wave function.
The electron ends up in any place because of environmental energy not because of
probability. See they will not disclose the source of the energy.
Do not accept what he says.
The ether is a liquid so thats why elections double slit patterns interfere.
They ignore Maxwell's error of the medium of electron waves.
Talk about being stuck in quantum mechanics, I'm closing my book again.
Nothing left but particle physics was one professors advice.
Some one post some good news on that video.




posted on Oct, 1 2012 @ 03:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by TeslaandLyne
reply to post by ubeenhad
 


Thanks but I did try to be real.
That Wave Function symbol is textbook for many years now.
Yes is quite interesting physics which we all had most likely.
I'll check it with my text books if I have too but might be hard to find.
See the video repeats what we already know perhaps but those that
accept the official word might be missing a few hundred years of
effective physics without being the wiser.


I checked as they gave me his life story.
Sines and cosines as any wave so that gives them the right to say wave function.
The electron ends up in any place because of environmental energy not because of
probability. See they will not disclose the source of the energy.
Do not accept what he says.
The ether is a liquid so thats why elections double slit patterns interfere.
They ignore Maxwell's error of the medium of electron waves.
Talk about being stuck in quantum mechanics, I'm closing my book again.
Nothing left but particle physics was one professors advice.
Some one post some good news on that video.


Yup don't listen to those silly guys with Ph.Ds they have no idea what they are talking about.



posted on Oct, 1 2012 @ 04:21 PM
link   
Ok, so where is the thread the initial post refers to...the person complaining they did not understand symbolic reasoning.



posted on Oct, 1 2012 @ 04:50 PM
link   
Meanwhile on topic:

I am a little addicted to these vids, they are great and there are so many.

I saw the guinness symbol and thought it would a little fun science but it was actually very serious and interesting physics.

60 symbols - Guinness



posted on Oct, 1 2012 @ 07:48 PM
link   
reply to post by ubeenhad
 


I like your one liners.
Adds as much to the whole Quantum Mechanical talk from nowhere man.
Ed: Oh don't ever quote me again with nothing to say.
edit on 10/1/2012 by TeslaandLyne because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 1 2012 @ 08:06 PM
link   
reply to post by yampa
 


An electron going into a proton.
That would be fantastic.
It does happen.
Called K capture.

A little voltage nudge into the proton which turns into neutron and emits a
neutrino and X ray I think. I hope not gamma rays.

Perhaps more energy out than in.



Ask them why the electron doesn't crash into the proton?


Energy levels for each in eV electron volts is the popular reason or was
I to ask them. Perhaps they know better.

So a few thousand volts DC on an iron pipe (the K level eV) can start K capture.
You don't want to be around something physical and not for me right now.
Thats the Lyne Iron Pipe hot flame maker but is it free energy.
Is the flame of Nitrogen.
Well it has to be because there is nothing else around.

ED: How soon they forget with this miss mash of Quantum mess.

Ever hear of free electrons. What about static electricity.
Real stuff.
Shocking too. Build up voltage to millions of volts and send beams to the
Moon and Planets. But official science does not want you to do that.
edit on 10/1/2012 by TeslaandLyne because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 1 2012 @ 08:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by TeslaandLyne
reply to post by ubeenhad
 


I like your one liners.
Adds as much to the whole Quantum Mechanical talk from nowhere man.
Ed: Oh don't ever quote me again with nothing to say.
edit on 10/1/2012 by TeslaandLyne because: (no reason given)


Clown shoes.



posted on Oct, 1 2012 @ 08:28 PM
link   
reply to post by ubeenhad
 


Now thats a proper Quantum Mechanical Wave Function response using
energy from the environment.
I think I'll see what further ideas yampa comes up with if you don't mind.
Clown jokes are boring.
Ed: get this get this:



Thats the Lyne Iron Pipe hot flame maker but is it free energy.
Is the flame of Nitrogen.
Well it has to be because there is nothing else around.


It has to be a Nitrogen flame because there is nothing else around.

edit on 10/1/2012 by TeslaandLyne because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 1 2012 @ 08:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by gymbeau2000
Ok, so where is the thread the initial post refers to...the person complaining they did not understand symbolic reasoning.


Dont remember, theres been too many people like tesla over here.
Wanna a run down on how the topic went? try the "what does space expand into thread" some dudes really on some stuff over there.



posted on Oct, 1 2012 @ 08:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by subject x
That's a very cool site.
If I'm not careful, I might even learn something from it.
Thanks!


Well, I sure won't! lol I clicked on the summation symbol. The guy quickly wrote something on paper, said, "That's summation," and the rest of that clip was about a guy named Fournier. Totally lost me.



posted on Oct, 1 2012 @ 08:38 PM
link   
reply to post by jiggerj
 


What link was that.
The summation sign would in some cases bring you there.
Sounds interesting non Quantum Mechanics.


Here is is I'll take a look.
Ed: They would do better giving some examples of its use.
That was an infinite summation and was replaced by Laplace integral to infinity.
I'll look for that one.
not there
perhaps look for F
No they don't do they one ether.

edit on 10/1/2012 by TeslaandLyne because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 1 2012 @ 08:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by TeslaandLyne
reply to post by jiggerj
 


What link was that.
The summation sign would in some cases bring you there.
Sounds interesting non Quantum Mechanics.


Did you even look a the website???????????

Most of it has nothing to do with QM





top topics
 
28
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join