Egypt's Oldest Known Art Identified, Is 15,000 Years Old, page 3

Pages: << 1 2 3 >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 28 times

reply posted on 1-10-2012 @ 05:54 PM by Akragon

Originally posted by thePharaoh

Originally posted by punkinworks10

What are you getting on about?
Are you saying that the rock art can't be more than 10k years old?
If so why do you think it can't be more than 10 k years old.

10k....im saying 4k

it cant be...because it isnt

peace

Award winning logic right there....

Bravo sir...

*clap*................ *clap*............. *clap*

edit on 1-10-2012 by Akragon because: (no reason given)

reply posted on 1-10-2012 @ 06:07 PM by Hanslune

Originally posted by thePharaoh
haha..young earth

no...i just know that we dont have any evidence, of any civilisation....5000 bc, let alone 6000....

thats been common knowledge for years....but now, we have odd finds with ridiculous dates attached.

You don't need a civilization to have rock art, a civilization fits a narrow set or criteria, a culture or industry can produce rock art, pottery, and the other things we find in abundance

i just think there is an agenda...to prove demi gods existed....then to prove they have ancestors.......
the same people making these claims also believe in a flood of 10,500 BC....stay ahead of the curve

Demi-gods? Don't think so, well we agree no earth wide flood in 10.5k....so what is your point? Not everyone is a 'Gnostic'.

reply posted on 1-10-2012 @ 06:11 PM by Hanslune

reply to post by Akragon

He rather glib eh?

Pharaoh I'll wait for you to come up with some sort of coherent comment......

reply posted on 1-10-2012 @ 06:50 PM by thePharaoh

reply to post by Hanslune

glib?
ok..its rude to be rude if the person your being rude to doesnt know how your being rude!!
lol

if im YEC...then your a gnostic....why else would you believe these "new" finds

i know you dont need a civilisation for a piece of art work.....but you do need people!!!...what other evidence is there....this is like darwinism in archeology....

edit on 1-10-2012 by thePharaoh because: (no reason given)

reply posted on 1-10-2012 @ 07:37 PM by HiGilgamesh

reply to post by Hanslune

The dating techniques are theory, it could be 115,000 years old but we are told its 15000 and believe it

reply posted on 2-10-2012 @ 01:27 AM by Hanslune

reply to post by HiGilgamesh

This was a guesstimate based on the art showing animals thought to have gone extinct around 15k.

As any guesstimate it belivable only as long as you want to believe it, do you?

edit on 2/10/12 by Hanslune because: (no reason given)

reply posted on 2-10-2012 @ 01:33 AM by Hanslune

Originally posted by thePharaoh
reply to post by Hanslune

glib?
ok..its rude to be rude if the person your being rude to doesnt know how your being rude!!
lol

if im YEC...then your a gnostic....why else would you believe these "new" finds

Nope definitely not Gnostic, nor any kind of Christian

i know you dont need a civilisation for a piece of art work.....but you do need people!!!...what other evidence is there....this is like darwinism in archeology....

Cultures have people they existed tens of thousands of years before the rock art was made (AFAWK). Not really sure what you are complaining about or the point of your comments. It's an article on research about rock art that the finders estimate is 15k based on a single piece of evidence....that is all. However you have been stating, glibly, that its another date. So where do you get that date from? That is the question.

Pages: << 1 2 3 >> ^^TOP^^