It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MrMaybeNot
...Now if you go deeper living things all live in pure harmony with nature & "mother" Earth. Every species do this except humans. We probably did long time ago, but on to my next point. ...
Originally posted by SpearMint
Originally posted by yourmaker
why cant it just always have existed? why is that question denied so harshly?
the space before the big bang existed infinitely and will always exist.
its beyond our comprehension as we are just appearing right in the middle and will die out just as quickly.
imo
The fact that it's still expanding faster than the speed of light strongly suggests it wasn't there before.
Originally posted by jiggerj
If space and time was created at the moment of the Big Bang [color=B89D54]??????, what space did the expanding universe expand into?
Originally posted by TheLonewolf
reply to post by OMsk3ptic
Love the avatar dude....On topic: I think the big bang theory is incorrect..I can not comprehend how the trillions of billions of galaxies, stars, planets, and moons that make up the universe, all that matter, could be condensed down into a singularity..I think it's a static universe that has always existed, and always will exist..I see no beginning or end to our universe
Originally posted by buster2010
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by buster2010
Here's are some good videos on the subject.
Thanks, buster. Next time I come here to not have a conversation, I'll certainly look at the videos.
It just that the videos explain parts that are left out of this thread. And you know what you can do with your attitude.
Originally posted by BrokenCircles
reply to post by jiggerj
Originally posted by jiggerj
If space and time was created at the moment of the Big Bang [color=B89D54]??????, what space did the expanding universe expand into?
What ever happened to the 3rd(and most important) word of that phrase?
I have been wondering this for quite some time now. It seems to have been gradually becoming more and more commonplace for people to just call it the 'Big Bang' as if it is the undeniable truth, which it most definitely is not. The Big Bang is still no more than a '[color=B89D54]Theory'.
Personally, I don't particularly like the theory. Do I have a better theory? Hell no, but that isn't a good enough reason for me to wholeheartedly believe that 'The Big Bang' is an undeniable fact explaining how it all began.....
Originally posted by ubeenhad
reply to post by jiggerj
GENIUS.
They wern't asking the right questions. For a long time. Thats what made Bohr and Schrodienger and feynman so special. They stopped asking logical questions, and looked solely at the data. Asking exactally were a photon is in space, is like asking the marital status of the number three.
Originally posted by Bodhi911
What if it expands and contracts in a endless loop? I was researching why people think the universe is flat when I stumbled upon the Orange theory:
Originally posted by ubeenhad
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
Ya.
One way is called QED (Quantum Electro Dynamics). every time a particle absorbs a photon(small quanta of energy). and spits it back out