Originally posted by aboriginee
I wonder what they mean, when they mention the earth-near space as one of the causing factors. Perhaps we can discuss about that, maybe we can carry
together some assumptions.
Cause, I mean, when there are going on some changes in the earth-near space, and if they are one of the reasons for the earth changes, maybe they are
the main reason.
Thanks for that link. You have no idea how many of us have been trying to warn people in sites like this one. I have tried since 2004, when I was
under the name Muadddib. Many scientists have known the truth about the ongoing Climate Change since at least 1978 and what it entails. Many of
those scientists have been trying to slowly inform the public about what is going on and what could happen.
Many people think the changes they have seen are extreme, but they have no idea that the worse is yet to come as our Solar System enters into the
interstellar cloud we are close to. So far our Solar System has only gotten small doses of the cloud which has affected every planet and moon with
an atmosphere in our Solar System, and including our Sun.
At first it was thought that we would encounter this cloud 10,000-50,000 years in the future, but recent research states that we will be completely
inside the cloud within 100 years.
Mankind will have to adapt. The places that will be worse to be at are those close to the ocean.
I have been trying to show other members in this website that much of the warming is not only coming from our Sun, but from the core of the Earth.
There are tens of thousands of underwater volcanoes in our oceans, far more than we have on land, and these volcanoes are powerful enough to heat
large sections of the oceans.
Similar events have occurred in the past which have all been caused by cosmic events. Most geologists, and Climate Scientists don't look to cosmic
events as the answer to Climate Changes, and instead blame it on a gas which really has no consequence on the global climate. Althought there are
many Geologists that do understand that CO2 is not the problem, but it has become popular to blame the ongoing Climate Change on manmade CO2, and this
is done to help usher us into a Global Socialist/fascist Government which is being set up with the excuse to "combat Climate Change, and for the good
of humanity and Earth", although the real purpose is just that those in power want more power, more control over people.
There are a lot of people in the world, and too many people can't be controlled so these same people in power want to depopulate the Earth at any
cost. This the the other reason why CO2 is being blamed for the ongoing Climate Change, so that it will be sequestered and this will cause for
plants, trees and everything that is green to stun it's growth and produce less food, which will cause massive starvation.
There are other ways that the elites are trying to depopulate the Earth so we can be more easily controlled. Vaccinations with chemicals that cause
cancer and sterilization. Their plan has become so bold that they are even offering sterilzation to girls as young as 15 years old even without their
parents consent. The Obama administration has passed this legislation which became implemented recently.
Girls who are orphaned, and are wards of the state can and will be sterilized without their consent. Abortion has become an accepted practice even if
the mother is in no threat of dying, which is most of the abortions being carried to this day. People have been indoctrinated into accepting that a
human fetus is not "developed yet hence not human", yet the same can be said of a baby who was just born, or a child of 10 years old. We are beings
who continuously develop throughout our entire lives.
Abortion has become so accepted that now the elites want to even allow parents and the state to murder children who will be born even if they have no
(NaturalNews) Since abortion on-demand is legal throughout most of the First World, the next logical step in the minds of some of the
world's pseudo-intellectual elite is to legalize the murder of babies after they are born as well. A new article published in the Journal of Medical
Ethics (JME) suggests that parents should be able to choose whether or not they want to murder their children after birth because these tiny
individuals apparently do not yet possess a "moral right to life," and are thus not actually
Most people are so brainwashed, even many of those who claim not to be, that eventually this view will also be accepted by many people and it will be
used just as women murder their unborn babies to this day.
We are facing many problems, some which we might not see through. But you have a choice, do you accept what the elites want for you, or do you fight
and take a moral stance against them?
edit on 29-9-2012 by ElectricUniverse because: (no reason given)