It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MDDoxs
I too am a bit divided on this issue. In my opinion, the prosecution needs to prove that there was a clear intent to deceive and manipulate figures for their own ends.
As the prosecution has alluded to, they are not concerned about the prediction aspect but the misrepresentation of the potential threat of an earthquake, which I find odd in itself. One could say any place in the world has some form of risk of earthquakes.
As an example, I live in Ontario Canada, we are not located on any kind of fault line, but sure enough we probably experienced 1 or 2 extremely minor earthquakes over the last 8 years as per my memory.
Seems like the easiest thing to have done was to say " yes there is a risk of a earthquake"
edit on 28-9-2012 by MDDoxs because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by WanderingThe3rd
Thats so retarded
There still isn't any good predictions methods for earthquakes, so how could you ever find someone guilty for of such pre·pos·ter·ous reasons.
Unbelievable
Originally posted by WanderingThe3rd
and if this is the case
i want the people arrested that were warned about purl harbor and did noting
i want the people arrested for the recent ambassador killing that were warned before hand and did noting
Originally posted by froglette
What would be their motive for knowing and down playing it?
Was it for real estate purchases?
Was it for Insurance purposes?
I am not clear that there was a motive or why?
Originally posted by MDDoxs
reply to post by RussianScientists
Where I live is considered safe, it doesn't mean I couldn't end up dead from Some natural disaster.... To proclaim they are guilty based on the uncertain nature of earthquakes is fool hardy in my opinion. Slap them with a fine maybe, but four years in prison for a "act of god" as it were does not make sense to me..edit on 28-9-2012 by MDDoxs because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by RussianScientists
Okay, I grew up and lived through multiple Earthquakes in Southern California. I now live just a long stone's throw from the New Madrid fault zone. I heard my whole childhood in California, after each moderate quake someone could feel, that pre-quakes DO happen but are rare...and are very unlikely so don't worry. That was stock-standard and routine.
SO MANY moderate quakes can be felt (a few a year anyway) in Southern California compared to how many actually go large and do damage, that playing it safe and playing UP the fact any one of those moderate quakes COULD foreshadow 'The Big One' or another MAJOR one would be totally irresponsible.
Of course some instances show pre-quakes happen. Japan is a real good example as they had small series in that area anyone can go look up in quake history archives....but just as often or more so, these little bursts come and go and nothing more ever comes, Thank God.
So...now, they SHOULD play fear monger, help worry everyone playing chicken little on a regular basis or face professional or personal ruin?
That's not science, that's propaganda. Science doesn't have pre-determined results in something impossible to predict with enough to go making idiotic warnings to the public about, nor would I ever want that to change. ....and yeah, it means once in a great while, they're wrong. So, they learn from it...not go to prison. Wow.