ATTENTION. Your not the most clever person in the world.

page: 3
4
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join

posted on Sep, 28 2012 @ 03:48 AM
link   
Ahh the old " I'm drunk and on my phone" excuse.
I'll challenge your maths; if you can provide me with 1 mathematical/scietific theorum you have devised yourself?

In fact I think I'd like to challenge any maths or scientific theorum that is solely the work of one person as without exception, it seems true revoloutionary ideas ( i.e never have been expressed by anyone else, previously) are particularily rare in humanity.

In terms of challenging, collective, mainstream science, your point is valid about using the recognised tools ( i.e scientific observation with evidence; usually of the maths kind) but dont for a second think science currently has all the answers.

We currently sit around smugly thinking we understand physiscs and yet we cant explain the basic underlying proprties of Gravity...a force which seemingly affects everything in the Universe whilst being so weak it shouldnt work.

How can we trust science when it is the classic "billiard tabe through a letter" box viewing experience.
edit on 28-9-2012 by Jukiodone because: (no reason given)




posted on Sep, 28 2012 @ 03:50 AM
link   
reply to post by Jukiodone
 


Alright, now you guys are talking. give me a second. I got some maths for yall!



posted on Sep, 28 2012 @ 03:52 AM
link   
While some of your claims there are correct, i love to point out simple things,
the coke fridge pack is a great one, remember back when those twelve packs
of drinks were mostly a different shape rectangle, well even with all of the
scientist that im sure those companies employ one finally after years said
oh man, look at this, if we just stretch it out and make it shorter but longer
it fits in the fridge!

a simple thought that changed the way we look at something, well one could
argue that even an arm chair wanna be physicist could get that one in a
million idea that he posts and a true physicist sees and from there does
the math which leads to a break thru in the field.

while i tend to think in a
similar way as you do about ideas being so abundant that most likely
anything you can think of has already been thought of, that line of
reasoning would only ever lead to a dead end simply because people
will stop trying should they do this, who all has to stop? just
those who don't have college degrees? just any college or are
certain ones better than others? who decides whose qualified to
actually do it right? do they have a personal agenda or not? is it
graded based on IQ? which test if so? if the theory ends up panning
out then should it be rejected if created by someone who lacks said
degrees?

did physicist of yesteryear influence us any less because
they didn't have modern collage degrees which apparently they should
have had or kept their ridiculous ideas to theirself? also if im not
completely wrong here didn't modern day colleges start in something
similar to coffee shops where academics got together and talked
shop? are they qualified to have built our modern day colleges? they
didn't have degrees.... or know the math we now know, simple fact is
learning does not require a degree, to make a career in science does but
that's a completely different set of arguments there. nah i say lets
hear all the crazy ideas, the crazier the better! no PHD no problem!
come one come all, after all this is not a scientific journal here its
a forum that was created for the very thing you argue against,
would you rather us all post on the journal websites all day and
bug them?



posted on Sep, 28 2012 @ 03:56 AM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.



posted on Sep, 28 2012 @ 03:58 AM
link   
reply to post by bloodreviara
 


Im sorry if i didnt make it clear. Educational level is important not degrees. If you sit down and teach yourself the tools you need to be competitive then you got just as much of a chance. But not casue you read some stephen hawking book for laymen.



posted on Sep, 28 2012 @ 03:58 AM
link   
reply to post by twistedlogic
 


didnt see it. hold on



posted on Sep, 28 2012 @ 04:00 AM
link   
reply to post by twistedlogic
 


I asked a few questions about the question can you answer them
edit on 28-9-2012 by ubeenhad because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 28 2012 @ 04:00 AM
link   
reply to post by ubeenhad
 


Ya see, this is what i dislike about internet forums.... If you had any understanding of physics you would have been able to answer my question as quickly as you typed that response. Any ole noob can use google, by not answering, you have only solidified in my mind that you are a troll..



posted on Sep, 28 2012 @ 04:02 AM
link   
reply to post by ubeenhad
 


upon impact obviously? i only wanna do it once



posted on Sep, 28 2012 @ 04:03 AM
link   
reply to post by twistedlogic
 


Edit: I give up, even if i try to reason yall are crazy.
edit on 28-9-2012 by ubeenhad because: (no reason given)
edit on 28-9-2012 by ubeenhad because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 28 2012 @ 04:05 AM
link   
reply to post by ubeenhad
 


Now if i answer its from google? wat kind of shi is this.



posted on Sep, 28 2012 @ 04:07 AM
link   
reply to post by ubeenhad
 





upon impact obviously?


Upon impact is not obvious to anyone who spends there time questioning the workings of the universe. I could have asked a number of things, how fast would it be moving at 140m, 118.56m, 53m...... along with the force it was carrying at any of those heights...

The more you speak the more your ignorance shows...

And a penny weighs approximately 2.5 grams



posted on Sep, 28 2012 @ 04:09 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Sep, 28 2012 @ 04:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by ubeenhad
come on, ask me to solve something I cant find an obvious solution for. with clear parameters. just to make you look stupid. ill be on in the morning for the conclusion of this epic tale of wits.

sarcasm
edit on 28-9-2012 by ubeenhad because: (no reason given)
edit on 28-9-2012 by ubeenhad because: (no reason given)


What is the sound of one hand clapping?



posted on Sep, 28 2012 @ 04:13 AM
link   
reply to post by ubeenhad
 


If its so easy to find then whats the answer? Come on now, my 15 year old brother would have answered that within the first 30 seconds. These are the preliminaries my friend, to see if you're even worth my time.

But honestly, you've already failed lol
edit on 28-9-2012 by twistedlogic because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 28 2012 @ 04:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by ubeenhad
if it is, Ill take my time and spellcheck.


Spell-check is not going to correct your grammar.

Just sayin'.



posted on Sep, 28 2012 @ 04:18 AM
link   
reply to post by twistedlogic
 

lol
i dont know many non astrophysicsts cosmologists that memorize that stuff.
edit on 28-9-2012 by ubeenhad because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 28 2012 @ 04:22 AM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.



posted on Sep, 28 2012 @ 04:25 AM
link   
reply to post by ubeenhad
 


What are "astrophysicsts cosmologists"?

Cosmologists that work for Astrophysicists!?

Sounds like you have a severe self esteem issue if all you want to do here is prove that you are more intelligent than the rest of us! Way to go to make yourself popular!
Your first day and already not very much liked!



posted on Sep, 28 2012 @ 04:25 AM
link   

Originally posted by twistedlogic
reply to post by ubeenhad
 


Ahem* don't forget this one.




Physics ay?

Lets make sure you're not just a troll real quick. Easy, entry level physics question for ya. If I were to drop a penny from a height of 200 meters on the moon how fast would it be going on impact and how many newtons would it exert?


You seem to have ignored my simple question and moved onto the question thrown at you by Jukiodone which can be answered with opinion.... You are looking more and more like a troll by the second.



Come on, what is the purpose of this? Is there something hidden inside? I mean s=1/2 a*t², v=a*t, p=m*v with s=200m, a=1.62m/s², m=2.5gram - thats not a question for a physicist, but for a lowlevel student.





top topics
 
4
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join


Haters, Bigots, Partisan Trolls, Propaganda Hacks, Racists, and LOL-tards: Time To Move On.
read more: Community Announcement re: Decorum