It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The problem I have with this explanation is in the comparison with the plant Venus. Venus has no magnetic field yet its atmosphere is over 90 times that of Earth's. I believe that our understanding of the nature of these planetary environments is lacking to say the least.
Originally posted by pavil
Originally posted by BalderAsir
so the question is, where'd it all go? How does a planet go from having running water, long enough to cause erosion to nothing?
Same as it's atmosphere.... ripped away bit by bit by the solar wind due to lack of a real magnetic field.
Originally posted by DiabolusFireDragon
If it is, then I'm ignorant on whether the period of liquid water would have been long enough for significant life to develop.
There is also another theory, which I find very entertaining, that the scar on Mars, Valles Marineris, is the result of a near miss rather than a collision.
Originally posted by Procession101
Originally posted by BalderAsir
so the question is, where'd it all go? How does a planet go from having running water, long enough to cause erosion to nothing?
A lot of people I know believe that it was a global cataclysm that caused Mars to be a "dead planet". If you look at the picture below you'll notice a huge impact scar on or around the equator. Many people believe that something must have collided or hit Mars and caused it to lose it's atmosphere and turned it into the bone dry rock it is today.
Mars Scaredit on 28-9-2012 by Procession101 because: (no reason given)
There is also another theory, which I find very entertaining, that the scar on Mars, Valles Marineris, is the result of a near miss rather than a collision.