It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
They will turn out in droves to defend this. It is only fair, or you are a bigot/racist/classist/selfish.... ad infinitum ad nauseum. Yet another example of why THEY don't divide us. WE are divided into at least two antithetical groups. Collectivists/Socialists vs Individualists.
Originally posted by DrNotforhire
reply to post by IAMTAT
its disgusting how much free crap these people are getting and the new headline on the drudge report is
"Im voting for Obama because he got me a phone"
come on liberals defend this I dare you
All the more reason to end all government assistance programs. This is beyond insane. You now have a right to a cell phone??? Are you friggin kidding me?!?
Originally posted by CALGARIAN
Thsi women is clearly out of her mind... BUT.. It's true.
If you are on social assistance, you can have a gov't subsidized phone.
Originally posted by Vaykun
reply to post by grey580
That's not all the right though.
See I believe the actual small government group, of which I would consider myself a part of, doesn't believe the government should have anything to do with business or contracts, beyond contracts involved in the construction of infrastructure projects and defence spending. But even those expenditures should be limited and carefully vetted. I want to limit government involvement in as many parts of life as possible.
Originally posted by Q33323
I have four "smart" phones in my family. It costs me around $240 a month... An amount that galls me to know end.
What else are we going to give away? Perhaps, Chevy Volts.