It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jimmyx
how can we go in and steal the oil if iran is radiated?...the large oil companies will demand a conventional war....or they can hire severly poor southeast asians to work in radiated oil fields if nukes are used
You literally make no sense.
We make general statements to convey a general tone. Everyone uses them, philosophy and logic sanctions them.
The camps were EXTERMINATION facilities. If you destroyed the camps - you would in fact be preventing the Germans from carrying on with their 'efficient' extermination program.
You have clearly never read up on the history of the Holocaust.
Every day 6000 people were killed, after 1944. This means, there were very few PERMANENT inhabitants of the camps. The vast majority of those people killed came off trains, got undressed, and went strait to the gas chambers.
I Scrolled through, and was expecting the next pic to be an ACME Anvil , falling on his head.
Originally posted by CALGARIAN
Originally posted by dontreally
reply to post by FlyersFan
Obama won't back him up and he won't bail him out. Obama doesn't like Israel. He simply doesn't.
I think it's deeper than not like Israel; I think it's a general dislike for all things Jewish.
The only rational, plausible answer is: they are scheming against the Jews.
No, they are used as blanket statements about a subject, and that is never true.
Planes crash, and some countries did not help Germany exterminate Jews.
I very clearly stated why they would be unable to destroy the camps without killing all prisoners there. To carpet bomb the facility, would have killed everyone.
Germany, if it had known that the Allies knew the location of the camps would have ramped up the killing,
Bombing the camp would not have stopped the killing
They would have been shipped to a different facility, or shot.
and will be my last post about it. Sorry for any potential derailing of this particular thread.
The camps had at most 100,000 inmates, mostly Jews. What needed to be destroyed was the gas chambers and the cremation facilities. These could have been destroyed without killing all those people in the camps - as they were separate areas.
Originally posted by all2human
The lines are definitely clear
edit on 27-9-2012 by all2human because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by DaesDaemar
If Iran does already have nukes, then an invasion has zero justification. If it's correct that they have had them since 2003, then obviously they are peaceful.