It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Obama won't back him up and he won't bail him out. Obama doesn't like Israel. He simply doesn't.
Originally posted by flice
He's so filled with assumptions... and he keeps repeating and repeating the same things.
Enriching process does NOT equal enriching for the purpose of building a bomb. What Nuttyahu is doing is brainwashing... it's propaganda.
And wow... such a liar... "advance human rights..." what a load of bsedit on 27/9/12 by flice because: (no reason given)
No. Everyone played their part. The Nazis the bad guy murderers, all the nations of Europe they just dallied into, sat idly by and did what the big bad Nazis told them, all gave up their Jews, all contributed to the horrors committed against them, and the so-called 'good guys' Britain and America, both showed a complete indifference, or even a general preference, to see Hitler accomplish his sordid task: to eliminate more Jews.
Finland, Albania, and Italy to a lesser extent refused to deport Jews.
There were many who worked in other countries to aid Jews by giving out passports, or outright hiding them.
I was making a general statement.
I've listed several examples from America and Britain that till this day go unexplained and leave many ominous questions open. The Vatican too played a very questionable part.edit on 27-9-2012 by dontreally because: (no reason given)
That was my problem with it, it was factually inaccurate.
What could they have done from a military standpoint?
They were in occupied territory, and sending men into occupied territory is not something any military leader is going to do, unless an overall plan of invasion is behind such an action.
A general statement is designed to convey the dominant, major situation.
You're just playing devils advocate now. Read the books referenced in my post
What the hell are you talking about? Read my posts! I never mentioned invading concentration camps. I'm referring to an AIR raid on the rail tracks leading to Auschwitz. I also mentioned an air campaign in and around Auschwitz in which the War department REFUSED to conduct a bombing of Auschwitz, to blowup the extermination camps, to prevent the Nazis from continue on killing 6000 Jews a DAY - which is what Auschwitz was doing by that time in the war.
General statements are never a good way to begin or end a discussion.
I also do not see what blowing up the camps would have done, other than killing more prisoners, than Germans.
They would have repaired the damage very quickly, continued killing, and you'd still have more deaths from the bombings.
Originally posted by Rapha
Iran already has nukes.
Shall i say that slowly....
IRAN HAS HAD ITS OWN NUKES SINCE 2002.
NEWS BRIEF: "RUSSIAN GENERAL CONFIRMS IRAN HAS NUCLEAR WEAPONS!", Stratfor Intelligence, Week of June 4, 2002.
"A Russian general's statement about Iran's nukes fails to register with media. Sometime a slip of the tongue is so incredible that no amount of doctoring can explain it. And sometimes a slip of the tongue is as intentional as could be.
"Then the Russian general takes a surprise turn: 'Now, as to whether or not Iran has tested something like that. Iran does have nuclear weapons,' Baluyevsky said. 'Of course, these are non-strategic nuclear weapons. I mean these are not ICBMs with a range of more than 5,500 kilometers and more."
This Russian general has just confirmed that Iran has nuclear warheads and theater missiles with which to deliver them
Isn't it blatently obvious why the west never attacks Iran ???????
No because tomorrow a zionist will say 'Iran will have nuke in 24 hours and must be attacked now'
What will ATS do? ATS will take it as the gospel truth, hook, line and sinker. Again and again.