It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by milominderbinder
reply to post by SLAYER69
Also note...yes...these opinions are all dated decades after the fact.
BECAUSE THE DOCUMENTS WERE ALL CLASSIFIED UNTIL THE MID '80's and didn't become fully available until the mid '90s.
I'VE ALREADY STATED THAT.
Thus, based upon the information available to historians in...say...the 1960's or '70's one might be willing accept the idea that Japan was intending to fight to the very last civilian died and using the nukes were one of the few options we had left to avoid accruing a MASSIVE amount of additional American deaths. If that were ACTUALLY the case...then I would have fully supported the use of nukes. I wouldn't have necessarily been HAPPY about it...but the world can be a dangerous place and if it comes down to "us or them"...then I say..."f^ck 'em".
However...that ISN'T what happened. What REALLY happened is that the Japanese TRIED surrendering but the US was not willing to initially accept that surrender until we had completely and utterly crushed the Japanese military machine.
Even this...I'm OK with. Better to do it "right" the first time so that Japan can't regroup and we just wind up fighting them all over again 5 or 10 years down the road. Cool. No problem.
However...AFTER we devastated 100% of their air power and naval power AND established undisputed air supremacy over the main island, AND cut off all of their wartime natural resources, AND they had been trying to surrender to us for 7 months...I can't STILL justify using a nuclear weapon against them...much less TWO of them. We won. They gave up. We nuked them anyways. That's inexcusable.
Likewise...if you use the excuse that "emotions were high" and "nukes killed people just as dead as our conventional bombing did"...does that mean that you think Iran has the moral authority to nuke two of our major US cities? After all..they are very angry so they meet the "emotions are high" condition and they already have a bunch of conventional bombs...so what's the difference, right? And the US DID topple the Iranian government three times in the last 60 years as well as give chemical weapons to Saddam Hussein which killed a million Iranians in the '80's...clearly ALL are acts of war against the Iranian government and people...right?
But let me guess..."that's different", right?
Hence...I would assert that Sinny's original thesis that the US is highly hypocritical is a valid one.
The definition of hypocrisy is more or less condemning the behavior of others whilst finding some sort of excuse for that same or similar behavior when it comes to the individual who is passing the judgement.
Go ahead...tell me I'm wrong. You're going to have a mighty tough time not coming across as a hypocrite unless you can show me that Japan really had another couple hundred warships stashed somewhere, that Japan happens to sit on top of an enormous oil well that I don't know about, or come out and just say that you think it Iran has a moral right to nuke our civilians because they are angry too.
However...I'd wager the only arguments I'm going to hear is more of "Yeah...but it's different when we __________".
Once again...that's the very definition of hypocrisy.edit on 28-9-2012 by milominderbinder because: formatting
Originally posted by Sinny
reply to post by SLAYER69
And your posts through out this thread also prove my point,
Good day, Cold Blooded Marine,
Signed, Sealed, Stamped, Sinny.
Does not matter how many ships they or may not have had stashed. The casualty estimate of invading mainland Japan was extrapolated on the casualties that actually occured on Okinawa. If we had to go hole from hole like we did on Oki, there would have been millions of casualties combined. They were in the process of training kids to charge with bamboo spears. The only way to get unconditional surrender and avoid the civilian casualties was to get the Emporer himself to announce it.
Originally posted by NavyDoc
Originally posted by Sinny
reply to post by SLAYER69
And your posts through out this thread also prove my point,
Good day, Cold Blooded Marine,
Signed, Sealed, Stamped, Sinny.
Yeah, those Marines are just a bunch of baby killers and eat infants for breakfast.
You really do not have any real frame of reference...no real life experience...no actual knowlege of the subject do you?
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
reply to post by Sinny
Whats up with that horned cornetto? Do you think it is a peace sign or devil's sign?
Hopefully you like this one better, since it kind of proves everyone shares the fad...or maybe more!
Originally posted by nosacrificenofreedom
Why are we so intent on proving each other wrong when the truth is usually far from what any of us realize and though some may have a good idea of the wrongs that are perpetuated noone knows the truth for sure!
Originally posted by Sinny
Originally posted by NavyDoc
Originally posted by Sinny
reply to post by SLAYER69
And your posts through out this thread also prove my point,
Good day, Cold Blooded Marine,
Signed, Sealed, Stamped, Sinny.
Yeah, those Marines are just a bunch of baby killers and eat infants for breakfast.
You really do not have any real frame of reference...no real life experience...no actual knowlege of the subject do you?
He named him self that, you silly billy.
Originally posted by milominderbinder
Does not matter how many ships they or may not have had stashed. The casualty estimate of invading mainland Japan was extrapolated on the casualties that actually occured on Okinawa. If we had to go hole from hole like we did on Oki, there would have been millions of casualties combined. They were in the process of training kids to charge with bamboo spears. The only way to get unconditional surrender and avoid the civilian casualties was to get the Emporer himself to announce it.
OK...so why would we have to invade? We crippled them militarily and cut off all the raw materials that they could have used to rebuild. As long as we stay off the mainland of Japan...kids with bamboo spears don't really pose any threats to aircraft carriers...right?
Besides...you are STILL choosing to ignore the salient and material historical fact that the Japanese HAD BEEN TRYING TO SURRENDER TO US FOR 7 MONTHS PRIOR TO DROPPING THE NUKES ON THEM.
Originally posted by Sinny
Originally posted by NavyDoc
Originally posted by Sinny
reply to post by SLAYER69
And your posts through out this thread also prove my point,
Good day, Cold Blooded Marine,
Signed, Sealed, Stamped, Sinny.
Yeah, those Marines are just a bunch of baby killers and eat infants for breakfast.
You really do not have any real frame of reference...no real life experience...no actual knowlege of the subject do you?
He named him self that, you silly billy.
Originally posted by NavyDoc
Originally posted by Sinny
Originally posted by NavyDoc
Originally posted by Sinny
reply to post by SLAYER69
And your posts through out this thread also prove my point,
Good day, Cold Blooded Marine,
Signed, Sealed, Stamped, Sinny.
Yeah, those Marines are just a bunch of baby killers and eat infants for breakfast.
You really do not have any real frame of reference...no real life experience...no actual knowlege of the subject do you?
He named him self that, you silly billy.
What does that have to do with anything? We've seen several pages of "US military are terrorists and war criminals. Obviously he put that in his sig as a sarcastic reply to your obviously uneducated and prejudicial stance towards people you know nothing about.
Originally posted by milominderbinder
reply to post by Sinny
You know what's the most confusing to me? It's how the hard-core right wingers are 100% CONVINCED that the Federal Government is inherently evil, absolutely dishonest, and has NOTHING but malevolent intent inside our borders...but then magically becomes a model of benevolence, altruism, and goodwill to mankind as soon as we start dropping bombs on brown people.
Which is it? Does the government lie or not? If they do...then who in their right mind would doubt FOR ONE SECOND that they would lie about the Japanese wanting to surrender for 7 months previous to our unwarranted nuking of women and children? Why would the government lie to us about something like healthcare...but tell the gospel truth about wars in the Middle East?
Which one needs more propaganda to justify? Taking care of kids with cancer or killing a couple hundred thousand civilians in Iraq? Statistically speaking...shouldn't the one that is harder to "sell" to the public be the one with the greatest amount of lies in the story??
Where's all this right-wing "common sense" I always hear so much about??
Originally posted by NavyDoc
Originally posted by Sinny
Originally posted by NavyDoc
Originally posted by Sinny
reply to post by SLAYER69
And your posts through out this thread also prove my point,
Good day, Cold Blooded Marine,
Signed, Sealed, Stamped, Sinny.
Yeah, those Marines are just a bunch of baby killers and eat infants for breakfast.
You really do not have any real frame of reference...no real life experience...no actual knowlege of the subject do you?
He named him self that, you silly billy.
What does that have to do with anything? We've seen several pages of "US military are terrorists and war criminals. Obviously he put that in his sig as a sarcastic reply to your obviously uneducated and prejudicial stance towards people you know nothing about.