Am I Exempt From The 2nd Amendment?, page 2


Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 27-9-2012 @ 06:53 AM by glassspider
reply to post by Asktheanimals



where would you draw the line out of interest, if you think somebody who has paranoid Schizophrenia who has had to be forcibly hospitalised in the past should be given a gun do you think everybody should be able to get one or are there certain groups that you would refuse if the decision was yours,


we also only have the OP's word that he is symptom free and as has already been discussed the very nature of paranoid Schizophrenia means that you can't make that type of judgement call for yourself? not trying to argue with you but i am interested to know if and where you would draw the line. in fairness the speeding comment would be enough for me to say perhaps your not responsible enough for a deadly weapon.


reply posted on 27-9-2012 @ 06:59 AM by wantsome
reply to post by LeatherNLace



I'm my first post I mentioned a shotgun and handgun. The shotgun for hunting handgun for home and hunting.


reply posted on 27-9-2012 @ 07:01 AM by 369821
reply to post by DerekJR321



Thanks for that. I was looking but couldnt find it. Hope this helps OP.


reply posted on 27-9-2012 @ 07:07 AM by KaiserSoze
Originally posted by exponent
Originally posted by wantsome
I've been symptom free for over 10 years. I still have access to guns. If I wanted to kill someone I'd use a baseball bat.

You may be symptom free, but you are not cured. If you wanted to kill someone with a baseball bat it would be much much harder than shooting them.

That difference is important to me.


That is a valid point but as they say "where there is a will there a way". This old story is a good example.

Three Soldiers are facing their final test, if they pass this test they will be able to join an elite anti-terrorist force.

A Drill Sergeant enters the room where the Soldiers are standing to attention. He barks the question at them "DO YOU LOVE YOUR COUNTRY!?"

"SIR, YES, SIR!" the Soldiers reply in unison.

"DO YOU LOVE YOUR WIVES?!" the Drill Sergeant yells.

"SIR, YES, SIR!" the Soldiers reply in unison again.

"WHAT DO YOU LOVE MORE!? YOUR COUNTRY OR YOUR WIFE!?" the Drill Sergeant inquires.

"SIR, MY COUNTRY, SIR!" the Soldiers reply in unison.

"WELL THEN MAGGOTS! PROVE IT!" he shouts before giving each soldier a handgun and leading them into the next room which contains three doors, the Drill Sergeant puts each Soldier in front of a door.

"Your wife is in the room in front of you" he tells all of the soldiers "as a member of an anti-terrorist organisation you have no room for weaknesses!, take your guns and KILL YOUR WIVES!"

One Soldier breaks down immediately and rushes into the room to retrieve his wife, they leave together.

The second Soldier takes his gun and walks into the room, after about five minutes he comes back out with his wife looking very pale "I couldn't do it" he says and leaves with his wife.

The third Soldier walks into the room and after about four minutes a loud bang is heard which echoes throughout the hallways immediately afterwards however there is suddenly a lot of loud crashing and screaming.

The Soldier comes out of the room looking very pleased with himself.

"WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED!?" the Drill Sergeant demands.

The Soldier replies "the gun was loaded with blanks, so I had to beat her to death with the chair!"


reply posted on 27-9-2012 @ 07:09 AM by wantsome
Originally posted by glassspider
reply to
post by Asktheanimals



where would you draw the line out of interest, if you think somebody who has paranoid Schizophrenia who has had to be forcibly hospitalised in the past should be given a gun do you think everybody should be able to get one or are there certain groups that you would refuse if the decision was yours,


we also only have the OP's word that he is symptom free and as has already been discussed the very nature of paranoid Schizophrenia means that you can't make that type of judgement call for yourself? not trying to argue with you but i am interested to know if and where you would draw the line. in fairness the speeding comment would be enough for me to say perhaps your not responsible enough for a deadly weapon.
I know reality I didn't always have schizophrenia. Onset of the illness started when I was 17. I didn't get diagnosed until I was 20. It took me 3 or 4 years to recover. I'm more sound mind now then most people I know without schizophrenia. I haven't had hallucinations or delusions in over 12 years. My medication has been cut down to almost nothing. I only take one med and it's a very low dose.


reply posted on 27-9-2012 @ 07:27 AM by glassspider
reply to post by wantsome



i hope that continues to improve for you,you should be very happy that you've been able to get yourself so far but from a few comments in this thread you have shown poor judgement and a lack of understanding of the effects of your behaviour on other people in the world as if you see yourself and your needs the only things worth considering

The speeding comment made me cringe you are already in possession of a deadly weapon and you show no care for the damage you could do with it to other people by losing control speeding. personally i would have people jump through a hell of a lot of hoops to get a gun medical checks, proper training, psych evaluations, criminal record checks but as i've already said i'm from england we have a very different attitude to firearms of any kind, even recently when the two police women were killed by a man with a gun and a grenade a few noisy people jumped up and down demanding the police were armed whilst the majority of police and police organisations insist that they don't want guns because it puts them in more danger, we just come from a very different place. either way it seems you will do whatever you can to get a gun and there are plenty of people on here giving you advice on how to sidestep the rules so i can only hope that you have a more responsible attitude to your gun when you have it than your car. and i hope that neither you or your neighbours are killed or maimed because of your determination to have a weapon. good luck


reply posted on 27-9-2012 @ 08:39 AM by projectvxn
Originally posted by 369821
reply to
post by projectvxn



Incorrect. Some states do not care about mental health status. And usually a gun shop only has your criminal history run, and nothing else. Especially with the current patients rights/privacy laws.


Not so. NICS is a federal system nearly all states participate in. The law that governs the NICS requires you to be of sound mental health. You are however correct to say that current law prohibits the disclosure of mental health records for a background check to purchase a firearm. That is a problem I think needs to be addressed because I don't want the OP or anyone else with severe mental problems to be able to purchase firearms at all.



reply posted on 27-9-2012 @ 10:10 AM by wantsome
Originally posted by projectvxn
Originally posted by 369821
reply to
post by projectvxn



Incorrect. Some states do not care about mental health status. And usually a gun shop only has your criminal history run, and nothing else. Especially with the current patients rights/privacy laws.


Not so. NICS is a federal system nearly all states participate in. The law that governs the NICS requires you to be of sound mental health. You are however correct to say that current law prohibits the disclosure of mental health records for a background check to purchase a firearm. That is a problem I think needs to be addressed because I don't want the OP or anyone else with severe mental problems to be able to purchase firearms at all.
What do you know about mental health problems? Not every body with mental health issues is a James Holmes.


reply posted on 27-9-2012 @ 10:28 AM by truthinfact
reply to post by wantsome



Are you worried about hurting yourself or others????

If the answer to that question is an Easy NO, than I believe you should be able to own your own hunting guns.

edit on 9/27/2012 by truthinfact because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 27-9-2012 @ 11:52 AM by projectvxn
reply to post by wantsome



I know enough to know that someone with a confirmed case of paranoid schizophrenia does not hold my confidence to be discerning enough to handle the responsibility of owning firearms.


reply posted on 27-9-2012 @ 12:13 PM by flyswatter
Originally posted by wantsome
Originally posted by projectvxn
Originally posted by 369821
reply to
post by projectvxn



Incorrect. Some states do not care about mental health status. And usually a gun shop only has your criminal history run, and nothing else. Especially with the current patients rights/privacy laws.


Not so. NICS is a federal system nearly all states participate in. The law that governs the NICS requires you to be of sound mental health. You are however correct to say that current law prohibits the disclosure of mental health records for a background check to purchase a firearm. That is a problem I think needs to be addressed because I don't want the OP or anyone else with severe mental problems to be able to purchase firearms at all.
What do you know about mental health problems? Not every body with mental health issues is a James Holmes.


The fact is that you are not, and never will be, "cured" of your mental illness. By your own admission you still take medication. Regardless of the dosage, that still indicates that at least one mental health professional believes that you still require it for maintenance of your condition.

I think that these types of things could be handled on more of a case-by-case basis, but by the letter of the law, you cannot legally purchase a firearm. You could always lie on forms, but that would only make your situation worse.
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



UN Proposes Tax On Americans for 3rd world countries
  Posted 18 days ago with 28 member flags
Armed bystander stops stabbing outside school
  Posted 12 days ago with 27 member flags
" Climate Change Is Not A Hoax", says Obama!!??
  Posted 4 days ago with 21 member flags
Former Arizona Sheriff Mack, ‘Gun Control Against the Law’
  Posted 13 days ago with 12 member flags
Limiting Freedom & It\'s Effects On Society
  Posted 17 days ago with 11 member flags