It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mobiusmale
(and, um, I don't buy in the whole Sweden will send him to America rap - Britain could just as easily dispatch him)
Originally posted by projectvxn
Originally posted by purplemer
reply to post by projectvxn
Bradley Manning stile those secrets and he should be exactly where he is.
So the man exposes war crimes, murder and torture by the US military.. He has been detained without trial and tortured..and you think he should be there. You are a defender of the Fourth Estate! I prefer to be a defender of free speech and transparency of government. Look at what happened over the last century. Do you what a repeat of it...
Bradley Manning is a member of The United States Army. He is subject to UCMJ. What evidence do you have that he has been tortured?edit on 27-9-2012 by projectvxn because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by AndyMayhew
reply to post by purplemer
But the truth misused and/or out of context is far more dangerous.
Something sociopaths like Assange would never accept because they care about no-one.
As an aside, I'm surprised no-one has suggest Assange is the antichrist (not that I believe in such things)
Originally posted by dazbog
Originally posted by AndyMayhew
reply to post by purplemer
But the truth misused and/or out of context is far more dangerous.
Something sociopaths like Assange would never accept because they care about no-one.
As an aside, I'm surprised no-one has suggest Assange is the antichrist (not that I believe in such things)
Just curious if you have actually visited Wikileaks and read the actual documents generated by our Military as well as diplomatic correspondence.If not, your observations are moot, If so then you are obviously entitled to your opinion. My understanding is Assange offered the White House access prior to release but they declined. This hardly appears to be the act of a sociopath. I paraphrase, however I believe The New York Times claims Wikileaks is the best thing since the Freedom of Information Act.
Considering these Wars and deaths are being fought in my name, as an American I'd like to know what the hell is actually going on. A subject [ War ] the White House and MSM appear reluctant to discuss.
Not to derail the topic, but have you read Frank Herbert's book Hellstrom's Hive? It talks about "sensitive agencies under the USA executive arm" having a very vested interest in stealing new technologies. But if you think about it, maybe that is a necessary protection. I am not sure what to think.
Originally posted by pauljs75
If certain commands in the U.S. military acted more honorably we shouldn't have Wikileaks considered as an adversary. (Wikileaks doesn't seem to play favorites.) It seems most of the classified stuff released there and upsetting the U.S. government is of a CYA nature. (Incident reports, diplomatic feeds, and things like that.) Not much in the way of materials/movement or technological information, which are classified for good reason. Also if they're finding that intel is compromised, then Wikileaks should still be at the bottom of their concerns. (Other parties which are true adversaries would be willing to pay much better.)
Also if there wasn't reason to worry about Wikileaks, we probably wouldn't have the issues leading to the recent stand-down either. Then soldiers wouldn't have that burden of conscience or whatever is going on that they're trying to keep hush-hush. It's probably harder to keep up that courage and commitment when they find that third part of the formula everyone learns in boot camp is missing. (My guess is that many don't appreciate being used as a soldier of fortune by proxy - where somebody else is benefiting, and then held indentured by contract. That's not what they signed on for.)
As far as what's going on with Assange, I'm sure we're all curious as to whether or not his organization has any more beans to spill, concidering the contentious nature of what's going on right now. Who wouldn't be, considering we're at a conspiracy forum.
Originally posted by projectvxn
reply to post by KhufuKeplerTriangle
If you see something wrong being done you bring it up your chain of command. You don't break your oath or violate your NDA.
I'm in the Army. I have a security clearance. My country is entrusting me with mission data that could be used against us to kill our fellow troops or diplomatic efforts overseas. I will not be party to that. The fact that Bradley Manning decided to turn his back on his brothers and sisters in uniform, regardless of the reasons, makes him a traitor in my eyes.edit on 28-9-2012 by projectvxn because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by projectvxn
reply to post by KhufuKeplerTriangle
If you see something wrong being done you bring it up your chain of command. You don't break your oath or violate your NDA.
I'm in the Army. I have a security clearance. My country is entrusting me with mission data that could be used against us to kill our fellow troops or diplomatic efforts overseas. I will not be party to that. The fact that Bradley Manning decided to turn his back on his brothers and sisters in uniform, regardless of the reasons, makes him a traitor in my eyes.edit on 28-9-2012 by projectvxn because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by projectvxn
Bradley Manning took an oath and signed an NDA. He violated both and severely hurt US relations around the world as well as hampering operations that were active when he released the information to Wikileaks. He should be prosecuted and jailed for the maximum amount of time possible.
Wikileaks itself should be left alone as well as Julian Assuage. Publishing classified material is not a crime unless you are the caretaker of that information as Manning was.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
reply to post by mobiusmale
Agreed. Further more ... Who the heck does he think he is anyways? He's appearing in front of the UN and 'demanding' things? It's absurd that he even was given the time to do that. But then again .. it's the UN ... they aren't the brightest tools in the shed ...