It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Phage
But the one today was a 6.4 so why count it?
edit on 9/26/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)
you just proved my point, thanks, but I'm not sure what your point is.
It's funny, there are four EQ's showing, three are 6.9, and one is 6.4, and guess which one they decide to use.
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
reply to post by taws6
If you notice the depth's it appears there were two separate earthquakes. I never said four.
It's funny, there are four EQ's showing, three are 6.9, and one is 6.4, and guess which one they decide to use.
It may not be 188 days exactly every time, but there could be some sort of cyclical pattern we may be able to calculate.
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
reply to post by taws6
If you notice the depth's it appears there were two separate earthquakes. I never said four.
It's funny, there are four EQ's showing, three are 6.9, and one is 6.4, and guess which one they decide to use.
There were at least two EQ's, one at about 10 km depth, the other at about 40 km depth.
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
reply to post by taws6
If you notice the depth's it appears there were two separate earthquakes. I never said four.
Originally posted by PatriotGames2
You literalists are freakin' funny. You have to come in and argue every damn thread.
This is how rumors get started? What, are you guys like the keepers of the gate? If you don't come in every thread that you don't agree with and harass the OP millions of people are going to start spreading rumors and it will lead to mass panic? Really? Let the guy have his conspiracy. Like he said, how is this any different then all kinds of variations of threads on this friggin' website?
He is obviously getting at the fact that there is some type of celestial body that is in our solar system causing disturbances. It doesn't LITERALLY have to be 188 days, even though that's what they call the theory, for some reason - the 188 day theory - but if it's close, I think it's still significant. The earth is not always based on precision. There are so many variables involved, there would be differences, if this were actually true.
I'm not saying I agree with the Planet X premise at all but it is plausible enough. We don't need 20 different posters trying to save the world from rumors and panicking. Why don't you just go start your own thread about something you are interested in after you've said your piece? Seems like what a decent person would do.
OP - While I cannot say I agree with any type of Nibiru theory because I usually rely on empirical evidence and there has been none, I have heard many experts talk on the subject and I find it fascinating. I have been reading threads on the "188 cycle" theory, and although I thought it was pretty much debunked because on certain days nothing really happened, I think you may be right that it's possible it wouldn't fall on the exact day every time. We might need to revise the name of the theory, 'cause people will just attack it and discredit it through that. It may not be 188 days exactly every time, but there could be some sort of cyclical pattern we may be able to calculate. Based on the Earth's rotation and the tilt of it's access, we need to take into account variables that could potentially make it a couple days off in some cases. Like you, or someone, mentioned.. there seems to be varying degrees of strength in the EQs depending on the season. There may be something to that. I'd get out your chart and some data and start mapping EQs from a couple years back, look at dates around where the 188 would fall, see if there is a correlation.
If I'm not mistaken, that's how scientist were able to find other celestial bodies orbiting a star.
Originally posted by PatriotGames2
It doesn't LITERALLY have to be 188 days, even though that's what they call the theory, for some reason - the 188 day theory - but if it's close, I think it's still significant. The earth is not always based on precision. There are so many variables involved, there would be differences, if this were actually true.