Israel /= Jew, page 6

reply to post by ElohimJD

---

Interesting answer....

Is that (are you) Seventh Day Adventist??? That sounds a bit like them. I am Baptist, I would agree with most of what you are saying, but don't know what, if any, official postion the SBC has on these matters. They typically are kind of open ended on this.

reply to post by CommandoJoe

---

Your links are hilarious. Even one had a "Zionist mall." You have to be joking.




Why do you think Israel is being attacked by Palestinians?

Over 5 million Palestinians were displaced after the state of Israel was created.

What did Palestine have to do with anything in WW2?

Nothing.

You know why they got displaced? Because there brown, and there is no way in hell France or any other European country would cut off a piece of land for to create Israel.

Have you heard of USS liberty, or Project Lavon? 15 men were killed and over 140 injured on the USS liberty, all done by Israel.


False flags are Israels specialty.





I hope he was joking, but of course, he's not.


Interesting photos.





farm4.static.flickr.com...


socioecohistory.files.wordpress.com...




Man these Orthodox Jews are pretty damn Anti- Semitic huh?












www.thecommentfactory.com...


www.aztlan.net...



You know it's funny, this reminds me of Iraq and Afghanistan. We've killed over a million civilians in Iraq from the 90's leading up to present day. The excuse now is "terrorism". The terrorists only exist because we occupied there lands, or we created them.



I doubt you will actually look at any of the videos or links, but let me ask you this.


Why do you think Palestine is fighting back? Wouldn't you be mad if 5 million of your brothers and sisters were displaced? And now they are being massacred on the streets and live in a area with little to no infrastructure. Put yourself in their shoes for once.


But, let's say your right.

Israel is only fighting terrorism.

Israel is killing civilians in Palestine, it's a fact. Look at Iraq and Afghanistan, over a million dead civilians caught in the crossfire. Killing them because we might think there terrorists. To what end? Are all the civilians there terrorists? When will the killing stop?

One more time for good measure.

What did Palestine have anything to do with WW2?


Also, I noticed none of you Israeli-Zionist supporters like to talk about the first video I linked, nor do they want to talk about USS Liberty or Project Lavon. USS Liberty and Project Lavon are undeniable facts. Both events are completely documented. The truth will always find a way to set people free. And that time is happening.


Fun fact- Joe Biden is a Zionist. I literally shot my milk out of my nose when he announced it an a interview.

Originally posted by MrDesolate
reply to post by sheepslayer247

---

I think anyone who puts forth the argument that anti Israel doesn't equal anti Jew is looking for an excuse to be anti Jew without being called antisemitic, and I think anyone who finds anything at all humorous about Hitler has a strange sense of propriety. Especially when used together. You picked it, you wear it.

This sounds like an argument the Israeli government would use against journalists, reporters, politicians when they've spoken truth about the Israel-Palestine occupation.

Usually claiming you're anti-Israel, equates to anti-Israeli government and being anti-Israeli government COMPLETELY differentiates from anti-Semitism. Plus, which intelligent and open-minded individual would be anti-Semitic, or anti-[put nationality or religion here] in this day and age? I know there a many worldwide, but they're peanuts compared to majority. Honestly, the PTB and the world governments couldn't care any less about nationality or religion. It's insignificant.

Eventually, everybody will be labelled anti-Semitic and it'll detract from the ACTUAL racists who hold dangerous and extreme ideologies.

reply to post by sheepslayer247

---

Dont try and side track the real dislike we have. Zoinist owning MSM and MSB(bankers) You wont win that arguement.

We already know most loving jewish people in the world dont like them to.

Originally posted by sheepslayer247

Originally posted by MrInquisitive

Originally posted by sheepslayer247
reply to post by The Old American

---

I believe it's Himmler.

You're not serious are you? Purdee sure it's der Führer, i.e. Hitler.

The guy in the background of my avatar is Himmler, I think.

Oh, in the background. Yes, think you're right, there.

reply to post by SrWingCommander

---

Could you site/provide some sources on the other Arab countries pushing Arab people into the Palestine region (for lack of a better term) during the 1948 war? I've heard this claimed before, but never seen any evidence of it. As for the fact that the dispossessed Palestinians didn't want to accept citizenship elsewhere, and wanted their homeland back, I don't blame them. Why should they accept being ethnically cleansed from their lands by the Jews, particularly Jews that came from other places in the Middle East or from Europe.

And Israel as is, is a imperial/colonial state. It is what it is, and if you support it, you support its long ongoing unsavory policies at the expense of another people.

If a Jewish homeland could have been created in a land not already occupied by a people, I'd be all for it, but I am vehemently against ethnic cleansing and kicking one people out of a land in order to bring other people in. Yet this is what Zionism is in effect. It would have been much better to have brought all the remaining European Jews after WIII and any other Jews who wanted to come, to the US. We had plenty of space and Jews were already well established here. Sure they used to have problems getting into some country clubs, private schools and certain job fields, but that has mostly gone away. All the money we have given in military aid to Israel could have been used for setting all these people up, many times over.

And yes, I realize and acknowledge that the US has its own ethnic cleansing and genocide issues; however, they occurred in less enlightened times before such things were supposedly outlawed by the UN Charter on human rights.

Originally posted by MrInquisitive
reply to post by SrWingCommander

---

Could you site/provide some sources on the other Arab countries pushing Arab people into the Palestine region (for lack of a better term) during the 1948 war? I've heard this claimed before, but never seen any evidence of it. As for the fact that the dispossessed Palestinians didn't want to accept citizenship elsewhere, and wanted their homeland back, I don't blame them. Why should they accept being ethnically cleansed from their lands by the Jews, particularly Jews that came from other places in the Middle East or from Europe.

And Israel as is, is a imperial/colonial state. It is what it is, and if you support it, you support its long ongoing unsavory policies at the expense of another people.

If a Jewish homeland could have been created in a land not already occupied by a people, I'd be all for it, but I am vehemently against ethnic cleansing and kicking one people out of a land in order to bring other people in. Yet this is what Zionism is in effect. It would have been much better to have brought all the remaining European Jews after WIII and any other Jews who wanted to come, to the US. We had plenty of space and Jews were already well established here. Sure they used to have problems getting into some country clubs, private schools and certain job fields, but that has mostly gone away. All the money we have given in military aid to Israel could have been used for setting all these people up, many times over.

And yes, I realize and acknowledge that the US has its own ethnic cleansing and genocide issues; however, they occurred in less enlightened times before such things were supposedly outlawed by the UN Charter on human rights.

www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org...

rslissak.com...

jcpa.org...

Here are a few. There are others of course. I realize being Jewish or Israeli centric sources you'll claim "propaganda". But they have other citations including UN.

Pushed was probably to strong a word. Offered various incentives might be better. Also after Ottoman Rule, but during British rule there was legal and illegal Arab immigration due to the economy in the region improving. However; the claim of a long standing Arab or "palestinian" presence is greatly disputed. The region really was kind of a deserted left over area.....

reply to post by Kang69

---

“Over 5 million Palestinians were displaced after the state of Israel was created. What did Palestine have to do with anything in WW2? Nothing. You know why they got displaced? Because there brown”

Where do you get these nonsense from?
Better yet, why do you have to resort to lies and exaggerations to make a point ?

One can say it is the Brits (British govt) who are the Zionists.

If it were not for them taking control of the region from the Ottomans during World War I, Israel would not exist.

In 1917 United Kingdom's Foreign Secretary Arthur James Balfour, on behalf of his Majesty's government, granted privilege to the Zionist Federation to establish a 'national home' for the 'Jewish' people.

The letter was addressed to Baron Rothschild (Walter Rothschild, 2nd Baron Rothschild).


en.wikipedia.org...

The letter:
---

United Kingdom 2 November 1917

Foreign Office, November 2nd, 1917.


Dear Lord Rothschild,

I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty's Government,
the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been
submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet.

"His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a
national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate
the achievement of the object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done
which may prejudice the civil and religious' rights of existing non-Jewish
communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any
other country".

I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the
Zionist Federation.

Yours sincerely,
(Signed) Arthur James Balfour


--- end letter ---



Again...

"it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious' rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine"


Of course the current greatest supporters of the political Zionists are still Great Britain and the United States. Why? Well of course because the political Zionists are a significant part of the governing body. I suspect however that all of these shenanigans are part of a larger plot.


(Disclaimer: the author only knows these things from internet hearsay and does not actually 'know' anything for certain.)

Additional internet hearsay-
en.wikipedia.org...

"Following its occupation by British troops in 1917–1918, Palestine was governed by the Occupied Enemy Territory Administration. In July 1920, the military administration was replaced by a civilian administration headed by a High Commissioner.[4] The first High Commissioner, Herbert Samuel, arrived in Palestine on 20 June 1920, to take up his appointment from 1 July.



(The arrival of Sir Herbert Samuel. From left to right: Col. T. E. Lawrence, Emir Abdullah, Air Marshal Sir Geoffrey Salmond, Sir Herbert Samuel and Sir Wyndham Deedes and others)

The Zionist Commission was formed in March 1918 and was active in promoting Zionist objectives in Palestine. On 19 April 1920, elections were held for the Assembly of Representatives of the Palestinian Jewish community.[5] The Zionist Commission received official recognition in 1922 as representative of the Palestinian Jewish community.[6]

Samuel tried to establish self-governing institutions in Palestine, as required by the mandate, but was frustrated by the refusal of the Arab leadership to co-operate with any institution which included Jewish participation."

en.wikipedia.org...


... And such were the beginnings of "Terrorism".

reply to post by sheepslayer247

---

See it's posts like these that really cheer me up on a Friday.

So, your statistics are right, however the underlining message is tenuous at best, because it may only be filled with 75% Jews, however they just happen to control everything including the remaining 25% and regularly treat them as lower than life.

So yes, you're right, Israel != (FTFY) Jew.

Thanks for the clarification, for a minute I thought I might have misunderstood, but nope.. it's still crystal clear.

T

reply to post by sheepslayer247

---

They do not act like a christian majority.... if they were truly christian half the crap that happens there wouldn't happen at all

reply to post by SrWingCommander

---

Thank you for the sources. I really do appreciate it. Started looking at one, but will spend more time with them. But you're also correct that I am suspicious of them because they do appear to be from pro-Zionism websites/sources. I note that one of them has a footnote that includes a Mort Zuckerman news piece or editorial, and a Netanyahu speech; seems rather -- no, VERY -- tautological as far as source material goes. Also saw that this same website cited quotes of Samuel Clemens -- the site uses his pen name, Mark Twain -- in his visit to the Holy Land, saying that it was a vast desert with no villages; never mind that his hosts were Jews and had in all likelihood a Zionist agenda to put forth, and never mind that Clemens never claimed to be a anthropologist or even to have made a thorough survey of the people of the area, but this website deems his travelogues make for compelling documentation. Not impressed. None the less, I will check them out further.

I have to say, though, that I am very suspicious of Jewish/Israeli sources on such matters. I remember reading an article on or by an Israeli/Jewish archaeologist whose research strongly suggested that the Jewish people were not enslaved by the Egyptians and then suddenly let go ala Exodus. He published his results, but said he was very hesitant to pass this information on to his 18-year-old daughter because it would be too upsetting and rock her world view, including her identity as a Jew and an Israeli. With such an unhealthy regard for the truth that this academic had, I tend to take anything claimed by Israelis/Jews regarding the history of the disputed territories with a boulder of NaCl.

And just read this regarding the two persons responsible for the one website you cited, which I discussed:

Dore Gold is President of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs. Previously, he served as Israel's Ambassador to the United Nations (1997-1999). He is the author of Hatred's Kingdom: How Saudi Arabia Supports the New Global Terrorism (Regnery, 2003).

Jeffrey S. Helmreich is the author of numerous articles on Israel for American newspapers and journals. His most recent Jerusalem Viewpoints include: "Beyond Political Terrorism: The New Challenge of Transcendent Terror" (November 2001); "The Israel Swing Factor: How the American Jewish Vote Influences U.S. Elections" (January 2001); and "Journalistic License: Professional Standards in the Print Media's Coverage of Israel" (August 2001).

These two guys definitely have Zionist agendas, so I am quite dubious of any points they are trying to make.

Originally posted by nOraKat
"Following its occupation by British troops in 1917–1918, Palestine was governed by the Occupied Enemy Territory Administration. In July 1920, the military administration was replaced by a civilian administration headed by a High Commissioner.[4] The first High Commissioner, Herbert Samuel, arrived in Palestine on 20 June 1920, to take up his appointment from 1 July.



(The arrival of Sir Herbert Samuel. From left to right: Col. T. E. Lawrence, Emir Abdullah, Air Marshal Sir Geoffrey Salmond, Sir Herbert Samuel and Sir Wyndham Deedes and others)

The Zionist Commission was formed in March 1918 and was active in promoting Zionist objectives in Palestine. On 19 April 1920, elections were held for the Assembly of Representatives of the Palestinian Jewish community.[5] The Zionist Commission received official recognition in 1922 as representative of the Palestinian Jewish community.[6]

Samuel tried to establish self-governing institutions in Palestine, as required by the mandate, but was frustrated by the refusal of the Arab leadership to co-operate with any institution which included Jewish participation."

en.wikipedia.org...


... And such were the beginnings of "Terrorism"

I'm not sure just exactly what your point is, or who who are suggesting started the terrorism (it was done by both sides, Arab and Jew, by the way) but the Wikipedia article notes that the Arabs refused to go along with the proposed british scheme because the governing council the British were trying to set up would hold 12 seats, 8 Arab and 2 each Christian and Jew, even though the Arabs constituted 88% of the population. So it would seem, contrary to the specious claims made to back up the Zionist myths about the area, it was predominantly Arab back after WWI anyway. And how dare those darn, radical Islamic Arabs insist upon representation based on the demographics of Palestine, which would mean out of 12 council members, they should have 10.56 (but hey, let's round it to 11, ok?) of them.

The problem the Arabs had was that there weren't bankers of Arab descent in control of the banks of England and Europe -- such as the Rothchilds -- nor were there high-up British government officials of Arab descent, whereas England had already had a prime minister of Jewish descent, Disraeli, so Jewish interests were much better looked after by the British than were Arab interests. Just as the US currently is in the dealings between Israel and Palestine, England back then was not a neutral mediator either.

Heck, watch "Lawrence of Arabia" for a history lesson. Who did the British get to fight the Ottoman Turks? It wasn't the Jews, but the Arabs. And after the fighting was over, the Arabs got shafted, with a few Arab clan leaders becoming British puppets; that is how the House of Saud came to be: a kingdom set up by Britain to control the Arab peoples. Can't be having representative, democratic government for the Arabs because they wouldn't want the Brits to have de facto colonial control over them and their resources, as they could by setting up puppet potentates in Arabia and Jordan.

Originally posted by SrWingCommander
reply to post by ElohimJD

---

Interesting answer....

Is that (are you) Seventh Day Adventist??? That sounds a bit like them. I am Baptist, I would agree with most of what you are saying, but don't know what, if any, official postion the SBC has on these matters. They typically are kind of open ended on this.

I am in the Church (called out ones) of (belonging to) God.

SDA have kept the 7th day Sabbath doctrine, but not the other commanded Holy Convocations of God (Holy Days).

Essentially we live (as best we can) the commandments of God revealed in scripture, and we do not keep anything outside of scriptoral authority.

I have many friends in the Southern Baptist faith, they really care about bible study and tend to be well versed in scripture. This usually helps them understand that what is written in not what is lived regarding religious obsevance in most of what is called "christianity", but sometimes it creates a stumbling block, because of the size of the followers and the strenth of the pastors at justifying doctrines not authorized in scripture.

You have a humble and contrite spirit. I cannot express how great it has been to have this exchange with you here.

God Bless,

Are You Offended??? SO WHAT!!!
  Posted 9 days ago with 97 member flags

Judge furious about undercover Police as Provocateurs in Occupy Movement in Texas
  Posted 5 days ago with 53 member flags

The Image of Baphomet: Upsetting Folks Since 1855.
  Posted 9 days ago with 39 member flags

New Scientific Report Destroys Global Warming!
  Posted 7 days ago with 32 member flags

Al Azif: Is The Necronomicon Real?
  Posted 8 days ago with 25 member flags

Civilian jet with 81 civilians shot by French Mirage instead of Qaddafi Plane over Sicily?
  Posted 17 days ago with 20 member flags

What The Hell Is This?
  Posted 5 days ago with 9 member flags

How copyright enforcement robots killed the Hugo Awards
  Posted 7 days ago with 4 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: