posted on Sep, 26 2012 @ 03:40 PM
Originally posted by fluff007
reply to post by buster2010
Just because you can use a dangerous product for 90 days and show no ill effects doesn't mean it's safe.
I do understand what you're saying. But we're not talking about coc aine we are talking about GMO. And clearly even if you do consume it for 90
days, studies have shown that it causes cancer and organ damage...
Maybe thats why the French have decided to do a longer, more thorough and extensive study. We shall see what findings await us.
edit on 26-9-2012 by fluff007 because: (no reason given)
The 90days people keep mentioning is a red herring, 90days was the cut off point for monsantos own studies, the studies actually went on much longer
than the 90 days but the findings they published in their own in house reports, the reports that eventually went on to persuade governments around the
world that GMO's were safe, only contained three months worth of data.
The data they left out of the reports showed that illness and disease became prevalent and affected the rats in a massive way at the 4 month mark,
90days is the cut off point monsanto used on its own data to prevent the studies presenting the truth, GMO's cause ilness and disease both chronic
and acute when they are a major part of the diet of the test subjects, it becomes a systemic poison, affecting not just the generation that is being
fed, but, more importantly their off spring.
GMO's are being used by those in the higher seats of power to cause sickness, weakness and death, whilst having the bonus of destroying the
It is believed to happen due to the round up chealating in the mothers body to such an extent that the embryo cannot maintain healthy and proper
growth in the womb due to a lack of available nutrients, the mother then spontaneously aborts.
Long term studies have been conducted by monsanto on their own products, they must know it has a propensity to cause disease, and yet, try to maintain
the secrecy by only giving test materiel to scientists who will sign an NDA, if you are a scientist WILLING to sign an NDA it's obvious you cannot be
very interested in ensuring the results of your studies get beyond the Monsanto ring fence.
Round-up all life and kill it slowly, whilst denying it is even happening, way to go, no wonder the governments of the world do so much to protect it.