It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
How do you account for all the people such as yourself who remain "awake" yet you are sprayed almost daily by the bad man? How is it that you resist the incredible urge to be docile and just accept what the bad man is telling you? Are you of a secret bloodline with a built in antidote?
And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them.
Originally posted by luxordelphi
reply to post by network dude
So you're here, in this forum, as a kind of crusader rabbit to keep kids from questioning being sprayed with toxins until the government decides to de-classify the information. Is that about it?
In the third scenario, ZnCdS would have toxic properties similar to those of cadmium sulfide, CdS, an insoluble cadmium compound. ZnCdS has a crystalline structure similar to that of CdS; the only difference is that in ZnCdS, zinc replaces 80% of the cadmium in the lattice. CdS is insoluble in water and lipids and slightly soluble in strong acids. Experimental data on toxicokinetics and toxicity of CdS are available. They clearly show that the cadmium in CdS is much less bioavailable than the cadmium in soluble compounds. Furthermore, it is plausible that the fusion of CdS with zinc sulfide, ZnS, at 900ºC will produce a crystalline lattice structure from which cadmium is even less bioavailable than CdS. Until experimental data to the contrary become available, it may reasonably be assumed that the fusion of CdS with ZnS essentially preserves the physicochemical and hence toxic properties of CdS. Therefore, the subcommittee chose to base its assessment of the potential toxicity of ZnCdS for noncancer health effects on the toxicity of CdS.
After learning that the Army conducted secret chemical testing in her impoverished St. Louis neighborhood at the height of the Cold War, she wonders if her own government is to blame.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by Rudy2shoes
Each case of scaremongering should be addressed - I see no reason to tolerate this rubbish just because there is other rubbish going on as well.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by Rudy2shoes
And how is that at all relevant?
Why do you beg the question that there is something to be "whistle blown" ?? Is it because you have already made up your mind and you are not interested in actual evidence.
What is wrong with being "some average joe" who looks at the available evidence? Why are you trying to suppress examination of hte evidence????
Originally posted by Rudy2shoes
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by Rudy2shoes
And how is that at all relevant?
Why do you beg the question that there is something to be "whistle blown" ?? Is it because you have already made up your mind and you are not interested in actual evidence.
What is wrong with being "some average joe" who looks at the available evidence? Why are you trying to suppress examination of hte evidence????
Like I said I can find evidence both ways on the internet with links.
I pick the links that say harmful to humans,
You pick the ones that say harmless to humans.
It is like buying shoes,
if I wear the same shoes as you, I claim it hurts my feet,
but you claim they never hurt your feet.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
The actual NAS report is readable here.
Perhaps someone would like to comment about its content rather than continue the uninformed scaremongering?