posted on Sep, 25 2012 @ 06:17 PM
reply to post by happykat39
I understand your view point, and I was being partially sarcastic, even so the US has destroyed and prevented many nations to flourish, look at your
fellow neighbor Mexico or the nefarious effect you have on Canada. I think it was Bush that stated that God Himself had ordered the attack on Iraq.
To me it is easier to rationalize people being idiots and behaving badly because of religious beliefs that than those that act the same but
rationalize their actions as good and proper, speak of doing them for the good of all and at the same time commit unspeakable things like infecting
women in South America with social diseases or use their own citizens to radiological and biological tests (among a myriad of other things)
Taking all this view points, and the notion that the UN and most media outlets are in the pocket of the Anglo-American I do not see how you can keep
you opinion (as expressed below)
And lets get one other thing straight. I am NOT defending any of our politicians since I don't trust them either. But the threat they present to us
and the world is minor compared to what radical Islam offers.
Europe has lived most of its history with Islam at its doors without any major issues (we even attacked them preemptively), with the "Reconquista"
(Reconquest of Spain and Portugal) at the approximately the same time we allied with them to fight then Kan that was invading what is today Turkey and
a Christian enclave in Constantinople.
We (you inclusive) owe much to Islam for keeping, in alliance with a very diminished enclave of the Orthodox Christian church the lights of culture
and intellectuality alight during the dark ages.
What you define as radical Islam arises with the interference of the Anglo-American interests on oil, see the root of the kingdoms of the region, in
particular the Saud-Arabia to see how misinformed you are about the root causes of the issues...
Israel was an imposition, part due to the guilt of Europe and an inability (even refusal) to deal with the Jewish that had been forcibly moved or
"voluntarily" had relocated to escape the Nazis, but it was ultimately a Anglo-American decision. To me even a premeditated attempt to have a
something between a distraction to Arab nationalist (ie. Egypt) and have a committed ally in the region.
Have you seen this video
(I hope this is the correct one).
edit on 25-9-2012 by Panic2k11 because: spelling