reply to The GUT from closed thread
Here's the thing, Aloysius, our government has a long history of spraying stuff in the atmosphere with little regard for the health-effects these
various tests and/or operations have on isolated--or even broad--sections of it's populations.
From aerial nuclear tests of the past to spraying questionable agents in other populations as zero lift has successfully debated you on in awesome ATS
family member loam's most-excellent SHOCKING: US Government tested radioactive gas on citizens in St. Louis.
And you think we should have no concerns in these areas? There's no denying they are spraying stuff. What for? How many different reasons, or
substances, or "tests?"
I can't imagine what kind of responsible, mature, citizen wouldn't have reason to be concerned about the subject.
Please don't do the "chicken side-step" You obviously have an intellect, what part of the above doesn't suggest logic...and wisdom?
Yes, you are correct, there is a record of your, and my, govt spraying (and generally using) materials that subsequently prove to be less than
desirable. This is true.
You will struggle to find one single post from any 'debunker' anywhere on this forum that says we shouldn't have concerns in these areas. Not one.
However you refer to logic and wisdom.
In what way are these qualities displayed by those who wilfully misrepresent contrails (you know, cannot persist and spread, quickly dissipate, that
sort of stuff)?
Or by those who post photos of military tankers, firefighting aircraft and test prototypes and label them as chemtrail aircraft? Not alleged or
suspected, but PROOF, when it is actually a lie.
Or those who write that aluminium has been found in soil, when the miracle would be if it wasn't?
Or the myriad other lies that the disinfo specialists trot out in order to pull people into a fear that cannot and has not been proven?
Even the act of talking about geoengineering and chemtrailing as if it is one and the same is just spreading more lies and misinformation.
Why, in your opinion, does the mere fact that we cannot trust anything our politicians say (except, apparently, if one of them says chemtrails are
real, ironically) mean that all requirements for real evidence of any activity actually taking place are suspended?
Ice cores could be sampled, for example, any spraying activity would be definitely, 100% revealed if this was done. Private companies offer aircraft
designed especially for air sampling, these could easily be routed through any trails lingering in the sky, they don't have to be trailing the actual
aircraft, chemtrails persist for hours, so the saying goes.
Why hasn't anybody that is pushing chemtrail theory for profit (Jones, Thomas, Carnicom etc) actually done ANY of this in the last 20 years?
They have however managed to fund two fictional movies which pretend to be scientific. Those guys aren't idiots. This must surely be a deliberate
So apply logic and wisdom into figuring that out.
We know about the the geoengineering theories, the discussions, the proposed experiments etc. We would all do well to monitor this, take our chances
when they present themselves to have our voices heard, to call for the release and study of all relevant information etc.
But then a sizeable portion of our members go and spoil it all by pointing at contrails and screaming "chemtrails!" like undereducated retards.
And it fills me with dismay.
edit on 7-10-2012 by waynos because: (no reason given)