It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
As part of my "Off The Grid" segment on the ATS Survival Internet Radio Broadcast (Bushcraft on Fire Radio), I am going to recreate this device. I will weekly be airing a description of my progress and conclusions for anyone who is curious about this device, and curious about the scientific approach to this type of research.
Originally posted by MeesterB
reply to post by inverslyproportional
I don't have to convince you.
Continue thinking that this guy suddenly rewrote everything we understand about the world.
As part of my "Off The Grid" segment on the ATS Survival Internet Radio Broadcast (Bushcraft on Fire Radio), I am going to recreate this device. I will weekly be airing a description of my progress and conclusions for anyone who is curious about this device, and curious about the scientific approach to this type of research.
But, it will cost little and might inform some people on how to approach such a claim. If a little time and a couple bucks raises the chances that hoaxes are called hoaxes rather than investigated, it's all worth it. Do you realize how hard the charlatans are making life on people who are actually working on real power production (like me)?
A permanent magnet constantly subjected to a reversal force will eventually lose its magnetism, but a magnet subjected to an aligned force will not.
In addition, a permanent magnet will tend to create this aligning force in any ferromagnetic substance that exists in its field.
A permanent magnet does not discharge particles; it creates a force field.
The proof either way will lie in physical prototyping, not in theory.
Originally posted by Erongaricuaro
I had an idea some time back that I never got around to playing with. It involves a wheel with fixed and electro-magnets arrayed with the intent of using the electro-magnet triggered by a transistor and trip device to give a light push each go-around using very little energy to propel the rig.
This would not be a "perpetual-motion" device per se
Originally posted by FatherLukeDuke
Originally posted by Erongaricuaro
This would not be a "perpetual-motion" device per se
No, it would be what's known as an electric motor.
Unfortunately, you are nearly 200 years late inventing it.
A magnet aligned in a magnetic field will still gradually get weaker over time. The magnitude of the magnetic field will increase though when a magnet is added to an existing field/magnet. Note too that in a literal sense, there is no such thing as a permanent magnet. Even rare earth magnets have a limited life and that life can be consumed ....just like a battery.
This is true (and it disproves your hypothesis that magnets somehow violate any of the laws of conservation) though it must be addressed that as the magnet influences the ferromagnetic substance, the magnet will get proportionately weaker.
It doesn't discharge particles as such....it radiates a magnetic field. As with anything that radiates.....It has a limited life.
If the industrial community worked on that philosophy, nothing would get done.
I was just pointing out that you don't have a clue what you are doing.
As long as there is a possibility, it becomes worth thinking about a prototype.
Ah, I see. Well, I guess me and my 'tiny little brain' will just have to go with 30 years of experimentation instead of listening to someone who thinks they have all the answers. After all, being able to design and build transformers, solenoids, relays, etc. is sooo much inferior to someone who can spout misunderstandings and insults on the Internet.
30 years of experimentation means diddle if you don't have a fundamental understanding of the subject to begin with.
Originally posted by TheRedneck
reply to post by OccamAssassin
30 years of experimentation means diddle if you don't have a fundamental understanding of the subject to begin with.
OK, so I don't know as much as you... care to inform dumb li'l me as to what a Henry is? How about the difference between a Tesla and a Weber? Oh, while you're at it, maybe you could enlighten me as to the theoretical workings of an inductor and its uses?
Maybe you could explain the magnetic field surrounding a capacitor?
Sheesh... you'd think I was threatening your mother instead of just building a prototype...
Checkout the first two posts (in this thread) at the top of page 11...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
How about A+B AxB(by the e though it need not be). Should suffice the geekiest thee.
Did you even bother to look at the first two posts at page 11 of this thread?
You're honestly not worried it will actually work, are you?
Originally posted by MeesterB
reply to post by inverslyproportional
I'm saying that gravity pulls the arm down just enough at the beginning to get the magnet cycle going. I'm not saying that gravity moves the arm the whole time. Without the arm, he would have to give the drum a little push to get it going.
The arm being the curved bit attached to the axle that rotates with the cylinder.edit on 9/25/2012 by MeesterB because: (no reason given)edit on 9/25/2012 by MeesterB because: (no reason given)