This may be the most important post many of you read in this thread so Listen Up Debunkers.
This is what chaps my hide about many of you. You so fervently claim these things Cannot work, Must not work it is Impossible for them to work because
they will Break the Laws of Physics. In your mind the Laws of Physics are immutable, unchangeable, cannot be re-written, cannot be expanded on,
discarded or even possibly wrong altogether.
This belief, this dogma, is Not scientific. You have just made your Science into a Religion and you have become a bunch of disciples instead of
The Laws of Physics are Not written in stone. We may never have enough information to believe they are, we certainly aren't there yet.
A "Law" in Science is Only a GENERALIZATION. Nothing More.
Here is the scientific definition from the National Center for Science Education.
Law: A descriptive generalization about how some aspect of the natural world behaves under stated circumstances.
It is Only a descriptive generalization - why? because it's a definition that allows us to effectively communicate our intentions or ideas - it by no
means implies the "law" is set in stone or is even accurate.
Here is the definition of a Fact, also not written in stone and is only for practical purposes
Fact: In science, an observation that has been repeatedly confirmed and for all practical purposes is accepted as “true.” Truth in science,
however, is never final and what is accepted as a fact today may be modified or even discarded tomorrow.
So please people stop using terms like impossible and acting like you know something is Definite and it must be true because otherwise it would
violate a "Law", this is silly nonsense. Ever heard Laws are made to be broken? Science allows for it's Laws of Physics to be broken - and Not
just by other scientists as some of you would have us believe but by anyone who can come up with a hypothesis and a theory to explain that hypothesis
that stands up to repeated experimentation and observation. At first we may not understand all that we observe happening but this doesn't make it
The reason all the above is true is because Science, is a Philosophy. You say, No, you have it wrong, science HAS a Philosophy. Granted, science does
indeed have a philosophy but science is also a philosophy unto itself. The writers of the above definitions understood this. Science and the
scientific method is simply one way of looking at something that seems to work best for practical purposes. The scientific method is by no means 100%
fool proof and must not be used to attempt to define absolutes. This goes against the very nature of Science itself. I may not be a scientists by
trade, but I dare say, I understand the inception of science far better than many of you.