Intelligence Chair: Obama and Clinton ‘Gave Permission Slip to Al Qaeda’

Intelligence Chair: Obama and Clinton ‘Gave Permission Slip to Al Qaeda’

House Intelligence Chairman Mike Rogers (R.-Ala.), referring to that failed U.S. TV campaign in Pakistan, is claiming that the TV efforts actually fueled more fires.

He calls it a "Permission Slip"......

(CNSNews.com) - House Intelligence Chairman Mike Rogers (R.-Ala.) said on CNN’s “State of the Union” on Sunday that President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, in broadcasting a television ad in Pakistan apologizing for a privately produced YouTube video that criticized Islam, had given al Qaeda and other “bad actors” a “permission slip” to do bad things.

Rogers also said there was a “high degree of probability that it is an al Qaeda or al Qaeda-affiliated group” that attacked the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, on Sept. 11, killing U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.

After the Obama-Clinton ad was broadcast in Pakistan last week, Pakistani Railways Minister Ghulam Ahmed Bilour said on Saturday that he would personally pay $100,000 to anyone who could kill the maker of a video, Innocence of Muslims, that had been posted on YouTube and that had inspired the apologetic Obama-Clinton ad.....

But then again, Obama sees all this a just "bumps in the road"

What were they hoping for anyway ?

A complete reprieve or something ?

reply to post by xuenchen


They are under the delusion that if they placate them all will be right with the world what both Clinton and Obama need to do is stop bombing the Pakistani's,.

That would be a start but it still would not make them "love" us.

reply to post by xuenchen


Eye for an eye makes the whole world blind. 'Nuff said.

Originally posted by AfterInfinity
reply to post by xuenchen

 

Eye for an eye makes the whole world blind. 'Nuff said.

That's a stupid saying. If you take that saying to heart then you can't penalize anyone for any criminal act. Why would those carrying out a just sentence be subject to sentencing themselves? So if you're on a jury and you find someone guilty and sentence them to 10 years in jail you need to go to jail for 10 years? There's no logic at all in that stupid saying.

People do things that are wrong. Appropriate penalties need to apply. An eye for an eye keeps someone from losing an arm over a piece of bread. Let the sentence meet the crime.