It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by neo96
Every single one of your sources is MSM. MSM sources report what they are told to report by various officials who, in many cases, actually write the stories for them (to ensure it gets spread as far as possible, a trick is to write the story for a reporter so they can run it, get credit for it, get paid for it, but not have to invest time in it).
It is unfortunate that, unless you are MSM, you don't get audience with those officials. And, unless you are MSM, you are not listed as "credible" among the mindless masses. The ultimate irony: the stamp of legitimacy for the watchdogs is actually the seal of a club for lapdogs.
Originally posted by EvilSadamClone
So whenever people target Jews in the rest of the world, it's all about punishing the Zionists huh?
I suppose that if Iran actually nukes Israel, it will be solely about the Zionists who rule Israel and not the innocent civlians.
Who cares about them right? They all serve their Zionist masters anyway.
Originally posted by tide88
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by neo96
Every single one of your sources is MSM. MSM sources report what they are told to report by various officials who, in many cases, actually write the stories for them (to ensure it gets spread as far as possible, a trick is to write the story for a reporter so they can run it, get credit for it, get paid for it, but not have to invest time in it).
It is unfortunate that, unless you are MSM, you don't get audience with those officials. And, unless you are MSM, you are not listed as "credible" among the mindless masses. The ultimate irony: the stamp of legitimacy for the watchdogs is actually the seal of a club for lapdogs.
So if the article is from MSM it's automatically false? That's funny because Iran's actions sure support what the MSM are reporting.
Hello informal fallacy. Please take a seat. So we stifle the rights of a nation because of a series of hypotheticals? Do you support pre-emptive strikes? How about arresting someone who looksl ike they may soon commit a crime, but has done nothing wrong? When was the last time Iran picked a fight with anyone? You are not talking about a nation that is known for war mongering. AHEM.
Originally posted by miniatus
There's no necessity for Iran to have built centrifuges..
Following is the list of Iran's 10 proposals.
1. By immediate reform of the regulations, the General Assembly, as the main pillar of the UN, must regain its true position as the manifestation of public participation in global management.
2. The regulations governing the Security Council must be totally transformed and reformed in the interests of nations and justice, through the participation of all members of the General Assembly immediately.
3. The progressive principles of equality and justice must be observed in the enactment and implementation of the law.
4. The international community should hold occupiers accountable and should try to return occupied lands to their real owners, and the rights of nations should be upheld.
5. The principles of the prohibition of threats and the initiation of force in relations between states and the peaceful resolution of differences should be the basis of the rule of law at the international level.
6. The principle of sovereign equality of states should be observed. All the governments should have an equal opportunity in management cooperation, normalization, and decision making at the international level.
7. All governments should equally honor their international commitments according to international treaties and regulations.
8. No government should abide by the rules imposed by the hegemonic countries.
9. Legitimate and legal rights of states and nations should be respected.
10. Respect for divine prophets and celestial religions, the common heritage of mankind, should be under legal protection in all societies so as to control the hostilities which result in hatred and war between human beings and atrocities and to strengthen peace and convergence of the people.
Originally posted by mideast
reply to post by EvilSadamClone
I suppose that if Iran actually nukes Israel, it will be solely about the Zionists who rule Israel and not the innocent civlians.
Salam Saddam
you know better that Iraq had no WMD's and Iran has no nuke and you won't see Iran nuking anywhere.
rest in peace
Originally posted by EvilSadamClone
You know, people are making the same mistakes with this guy as they did with Hitler. Hitler warned us what he would do with the Jews, nobody listened.
Originally posted by ClicheCalvicade
Originally posted by GLaDOS
Originally posted by neo96
Iran has sent arms to Syria, they have sent arms to Lebanon. They have also sent arms to Iraq and Afghanistan.
US has sent weapons to nearly every country in the world. Your point is?
America is not a theocracy spearheaded by fundamentalists who encourage an apocalyptic, religiously fueled ideology.
If you did not honestly see the point...sheesh, I'll keep my tongue.
So we stifle the rights of a nation because of a series of hypotheticals? Do you support pre-emptive strikes? How about arresting someone who looksl ike they may soon commit a crime, but has done nothing wrong?
"We see the US and the Zionist regime standing fully on the side of each other and we cannot imagine the Zionist regime initiating a war without the US backup. Due to the same reason, if a war breaks out, we will definitely wage battle on both sides and will definitely be engaged with the US bases," he said.
"(Given the above-mentioned failures) how does it (the Zionist regime) want to be a threat against the Islamic Republic of Iran?" Salami asked.
He, meantime, underlined Iran's preparedness to confront any aggression against the country, and said, "Our defensive power has been created on the basis of our defensive strategy and the presumption ruling our defensive strategy is that we will enter an massive battle with a US-led coalition."
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by EvilSadamClone
Oh, they are by no means innocent. It is like two people who have played tit for tat for so long that they are both pretty guilty.
But what you define as "terrorist" applies to the US as well. Its that whole "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter".
I am an American. A damned proud one at that. But, and as Franklin said, "Where there is liberty, there is my land." And I am not seeing much liberty in America any more.
How's that for the ultimate insult: we hate our "enemy" because he reminds us of how great we used to be.
Originally posted by tide88
Originally posted by mideast
reply to post by EvilSadamClone
I suppose that if Iran actually nukes Israel, it will be solely about the Zionists who rule Israel and not the innocent civlians.
Salam Saddam
you know better that Iraq had no WMD's and Iran has no nuke and you won't see Iran nuking anywhere.
rest in peace
hold on a sec about the WMD's and IRAQ.
Many of Syria's Chemical Weapons May Have Come From Saddam's Iraq
Seems to me Bush may have been right the whole time
Just exactly how many times can one man use the words, "defensive strategy" in a sentence in order to get everyone to believe it? It sounds like he's trying to convince himself.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
I am an American. A damned proud one at that. But, and as Franklin said, "Where there is liberty, there is my land." And I am not seeing much liberty in America any more.