Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Crushing Concrete into Dust in Mid-air

page: 4
6
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join

posted on Oct, 5 2012 @ 03:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by GenRadek
reply to post by NewAgeMan
 

Peer-reviewed by whom exactly? Dr. Griffin? Richard (Boxboy) Gage? Dr. Steven (Chipman) Jones? Yeah, that is like having the Scientologists peer-reviewing a paper on why Scientology is correct and all other religions are wrong.

Um no, by the editors, scientists and engineers of the magazine, which will be going out to ASCE members who subsribe to it.

My hope it that Bazant will respond, and that a scientific debate over the issue will ensue.




posted on Oct, 27 2012 @ 03:01 PM
link   
There is only one method of demolition that can account for ALL of the dustification type events seen: fission type devices, meaning nukes. There are many highly specific and containable fission devices that can be used for construction purposes, studied in detail by the feds long ago. Of course 9-11 wqas a state(s) sponsored event and so the perp's had access to the most sophisticated explosives in existence. Of course some conventional explosives were used, primarily to weaken critical structural joints ( as seen dripping at a corner prior to the final button push and complete " collapse")

Remember the EMP effects testified to by Androvic and others that cannot be expalined away by anything except a nuclear event. Remember the massive explosions in the sub-basements prior to the aitplane hits far abobe, meant to weaken all core steel and disconnect critical beams, etc. Watching a massive multi-story section of Tower lean over, destined to drop into the street below, and then impossibly drop straight down as the supports underneath inexplicably turn to dust and allow the drop...mind numbing from a physics point of view.

Then, the section did not stay intact and crush down onto the remaining upper floors at fire level..no..it also exploded into fine dust, as if it were entering a zone of dustification...then the remaining floors simply exploded outward and continued all the way down, with no weight on top of any of it, just shredding and flinging micron sized body parts far away onto the roofs of adjoining buildings.

How could anyone believe that gravity alone could propel, after blasting apart into micron sized bits, the remains of people and office effects hundreds of yards away? It staggers the sound mind to try and comprehend the mindset that could believe the fairy tale that is the only excuse offered by the deniers of reality. A collapsing buildingCANNOT, by any means of physics known to exist, blast people and effects into tiny shreds and then hurl them far away and upward...it is beyond belief. It takes a leap of faith that transcends common sense and all the available information to accept such nonsense.

Had conventional explosives been used, there would have been too many very loud explosions and venting events....so a few directed fission devices along with standard explosives did the job, although it was choreagraphed brilliantly...and not by people in caves in the middle east but by operatives in Washington and TelAviv and karachi,. no doubt. One has to defy logic, defy science, defy the photographic proof, defy any and all known factors present to accept the official lie.

Dustification of the concrete is a major clue, and one that cannt and never will be explained away by the deniers...they either have an agenda or are frightened to accept the facts....that is the only choice...nio one after reveiwing all the facts could possibly accept the official nonsense...impossible.



posted on Nov, 27 2012 @ 03:34 AM
link   
If a steel beam coated in concrete were to hurl down wouldnt it all come off in dust upon impact? Or should it be more sturdy than that?





new topics
 
6
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join