Perpetual Motion is not a Myth. , page 3

Pages: << 1 2 3 4 5 6 >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 8 times

reply posted on 24-9-2012 @ 09:42 AM by boncho

Originally posted by ken10

Originally posted by SpearMint

Originally posted by dontlaughthink
reply to post by SpearMint

So you read it's impossible... good research eh?

No, I know it's impossible because I have more than a basic understanding of energy and the laws of thermodynamics, which perpetual motion violates.

You are an attention seeking liar.

But perpetual motion only requires a moving object not be affected by other forces !!!

I think people are getting confused with Free-energy, which has more output than input.

I think you need to take grade 4 science again.

reply posted on 24-9-2012 @ 09:50 AM by dontlaughthink

reply to post by SpearMint

At last a question... lets see how many comment on my what you need post.

reply posted on 24-9-2012 @ 09:59 AM by Sparky63

Not to be rude...but as my daddy always said, "Put up or shut up." I'm looking forward to see your design, sketches, or whatever you have to present. If you fail to deliver, that I would hope that this thread be moved to the HOAX forum.
Ball is in your court.

reply posted on 24-9-2012 @ 10:01 AM by DeReK DaRkLy

reply to post by dontlaughthink

You call BS... and me a liar.... so you don't want to know, fair enough.

Pay no attention to the naysayers. There's more bitterness and skepticism coursing through this site than an Auschwitz nursing home...

(oooh, too soon?)

It never hurts to try to come up with new inventions - (better than sitting around knocking someone else's idea to the ground, eh?) Heck, even if it's not true perpetual motion, anything which can create energy at an efficient cost is welcome!

edit on 24-9-2012 by DeReK DaRkLy because: sses

reply posted on 24-9-2012 @ 10:05 AM by inverslyproportional

reply to post by dontlaughthink

You mentioned water proof tape, and that water proof cardboard was not entirely necessary. Does this mean your using a liquid?

Liquids have friction when they move, as the atoms moving past eachother causes heat, which is a side effect of friction.

Are you meaning to use a super fluid? Maybe liquid helium?

reply posted on 24-9-2012 @ 10:10 AM by dontlaughthink

reply to post by inverslyproportional

Just using water for the model, thanks for the questions.

reply posted on 24-9-2012 @ 10:12 AM by Ulyeney

Originally posted by butcherguy
Then why not do it.....
Instead of making us think that you are an attention-seeking troll?

It is obvious who the attention-seeking trolls are in this thread.

reply posted on 24-9-2012 @ 10:16 AM by SpearMint

Originally posted by dontlaughthink
reply to post by SpearMint

At last a question... lets see how many comment on my what you need post.

If you're going to talk to me, please use English.

reply posted on 24-9-2012 @ 10:16 AM by CaptChaos

So let's see it already. I've got all the cardboard, tape, scissors, etc. right here.

So come on, already.

reply posted on 24-9-2012 @ 10:17 AM by SpearMint

Originally posted by Ulyeney

Originally posted by butcherguy
Then why not do it.....
Instead of making us think that you are an attention-seeking troll?

It is obvious who the attention-seeking trolls are in this thread.

Are you serious? He is right, the OP claimed he/she has an impossible device but never really had the intention of releasing it (it's impossible). Op is the troll.

reply posted on 24-9-2012 @ 10:18 AM by inverslyproportional

reply to post by Ulyeney

I am losing interest at an exponential rate, in less then 5 minutes I will just not care at all any more. I will just wait for another thread about how a guy from ATS discovered perpetual motion.

reply posted on 24-9-2012 @ 10:20 AM by skalla

three pages in and all i see is bra straps. i want boobs

reply posted on 24-9-2012 @ 10:24 AM by dontlaughthink

Sorry I have to go out. I will be back in 5 hours to build the device.

Look at what you need on page 2 have a good laugh .... then I will show you what to do when I get back.... The inventors will love it... part of it could help with your machines.

reply posted on 24-9-2012 @ 10:41 AM by butcherguy

Originally posted by inverslyproportional
reply to post by butcherguy

Butcher guy, perpetual has never meant forever, as forever is nonsense. Nothing is "forever" not even space or time. You are interpreting it to mean "forever" which is nonsense. If a man makes a machine and it runs for the length of his life without outside energy added, it would be labeled as perpetual motion, by every scientist on the planet. Stop using semantics to try to argue your point. It is not based in rational thought.

Okay, let us not argue semantics.
The point is perpetual motion vs free energy. Got either?

Perpetual Motion

Can you show me a perpetual motion machine. If you have one, there are a lot of people that would be interested in seeing it.

reply posted on 24-9-2012 @ 10:52 AM by Wongbeedman

reply to post by dontlaughthink

Why does this have any stars or flags he's not shown us anything yet?
But yes we all want to see it and we all know you did it first.
If you're not lying I think you should be abit more excited about this

edit on 24-9-2012 by Wongbeedman because: (no reason given)

reply posted on 24-9-2012 @ 10:55 AM by Wongbeedman

reply to post by dontlaughthink

So you haven't even built it yet!?!?

Oh by the way guys wanna see my Stargate to another dimension in time and Space?
Well I Havent actually made it yet....

reply posted on 24-9-2012 @ 10:57 AM by patmac573

It is very simple sir:

PUT UP OR SHUT UP!

Thank You and have a nice Day!

reply posted on 24-9-2012 @ 10:58 AM by Wongbeedman

reply to post by DeReK DaRkLy

But telling everyone about it and actually doing it are two different things.
Just because you believe perpetual motion is possible doesn't mean you have to side with Anyone who claims they've achieved it.

reply posted on 24-9-2012 @ 10:59 AM by subject x