It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Leaked Weather Modification Document

page: 1

log in


posted on Sep, 24 2012 @ 01:29 AM
This seems to have been around for a while but some may not have had a chance to view it. Insurance companies want to deny claims for Man Made weather. I don't blame them, you made it, you pay for the damages...

Below is a link to a memo from Andrea Psoras dated May 5, 2008, who is from QED International, to the Secretary of the Commodities Future Trading Commission (CFTC) discussing the ‘legitimacy’ of trading insurance risk related to weather events, as commodities.

Commodities are traded every day on the stock markets all over the world. Insurance companies insure for “events” that protect these commodities as well as property. These “event” contracts are also traded on the stock market.

At the present time, insurance companies provide compensation in the event of a natural catastrophe.

So the question is, according to this memo, “Should insurance companies be liable for the “weather manipulation” events that occur that are covered under insurance policies?”

Basically, the insurance industry wants the term “natural event” to be completely redefined to mean “only natural events” and leave out any “weather manipulation/modification or earth shaking events” from the policies. The insurance companies don’t want to be liable for providing compensation for what the government, military, and intelligence agencies are creating with weather manipulation technologies.

They cite a report from August 1996, to the Air Force, that the government wants to rule the weather by 2025. So if a particular tornado, earthquake, hurricane, or flooding is found to NOT BE A NATURAL event, then the insurance companies don’t want to pay for it – and want that defined in the policies.

The memo goes on to list the areas of weather modification:

* Fog – creating fog by means of cloud seeding, dispersal techniques, and chemtrails
* Precipitation – creating precipitation by means of lasers and using nanotechnology
* Storms – creating and controlling storms by means of creating heat in atmosphere, storm cell triggering, and lightning modification
* Space-Weather Modification – through controlling the ionosphere using chemical vapors, heating the electromagnetic radiation, x-rays, particle beams, and radiation beams

Please read the document. It will open your eyes to exactly what is going on around us everyday right under our noses.

They even have diagrams showing the system of going about modifying our weather.

More Here with Links

PS: Don't waste your time on the picture dis-info-bunkers as it's clearly a fire suppression tanker. Just a stock photo used for the story I'd imagine...

posted on Sep, 24 2012 @ 01:41 AM

posted on Sep, 24 2012 @ 01:46 AM
interesting. while i am a believer in chemtrails, this story does raise some suspicions. 1 most insurance policies do not cover acts of god, or at least the insurance companies try as hard as they can not to pay out anyway. 2. the insurance companies owe the government a debt of gratitude for the "laws" requiring people to purchase insurance, and i dont really see them pointing out possible government created disasters. i will definitely put this in my "hmmm?" pile

posted on Sep, 24 2012 @ 01:50 AM
Yeah I always wondered how could one get God on the witness stand to testify that he created the disaster...

That "Act of God" term always bugged me....

posted on Sep, 24 2012 @ 06:29 PM
It's just a letter from Andrea Psoras, who simply repeats the usual chemtrail talking points. It's not actually anything official. Also it's been discussed several times here:

posted on Nov, 2 2012 @ 09:06 AM
For those who are speaking of weather modification...either yay or nay...this may be of interest:

Environmental Modification Convention


top topics

log in