It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Sen. Dean Heller was one of just a small handful of Republicans in the Senate who crossed the aisle Wednesday to join Democrats in supporting a bill to create jobs for veterans.
But efforts to advance the bill failed anyway — another victim of the partisan, pre-election proxy war members of Congress continue to wage in Washington.
The Senate came two votes short of the 60-vote hurdle needed to avoid a filibuster on a measure to steer a billion dollars toward getting up to 20,000 veterans employed.
Murray called the vote “a stark reminder that ... Senate Republicans are willing to do absolutely anything to fulfill the pledge they made nearly two years ago to defeat President Obama — it doesn’t matter who gets in their way ... even if it’s our nation’s veterans.” She later added: “Veterans are watching this vote closely.”
Sens. Heller and Scott Brown of Massachusetts were two of the five Republicans who elected to buck the party and add their support to the bill — which they emphasized by highlighting that legislative effort in statements directed toward the veteran community.
“Job creation is and continues to be my No. 1 priority — especially for our veterans,” Heller said in a statement released shortly after the vote. “After everything our veterans have done for us, the least we can do is make sure they are afforded every opportunity to thrive here at home. We owe a debt of gratitude to these heroes and I am proud to support the Veterans Jobs Corps Bill.”
(OP’s Source)
Others, like Sens. Jeff Sessions of Alabama and Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, argued the bill spends too much money on a duplicative program.
“The desire to help veterans is a noble desire ... but what are the other things that we’re doing for jobs for veterans and how well are they working?” Coburn asked. “We have six veteran job training programs. We already have a preference across the federal government for hiring veterans ... What we have is a bill that's brought to the floor that has good intentions behind it but shows the absolute laziness of Congress in terms of really digging things out.”
This was nothing but a stunt to win favor among veterans! When are some of you going to stop being fooled when veterans are used as a political football?
No my friend. Shame On You
Originally posted by seabag
This was nothing but a stunt to win favor among veterans! When are some of you going to stop being fooled when veterans are used as a political football?
Shame on you!
They have no problems funding wars and sending troops to war but it seems it is just too costly to help them when they get back.
Something like a Vets Bill, should be Bi-Partisan, without a doubt.
The unemployment rate for veterans who served on active duty in the U.S. Armed Forces at any time since September 2001--a group referred to as Gulf War-era II veterans--was 12.1 percent in 2011, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. The jobless rate for all veterans was 8.3 percent.
The unemployment rate for Iraq and Afghanistan-era Veterans (or Gulf War II-era Veterans) in August ticked up to 10.9 percent. However, as we’ve noted before, month-to-month unemployment figures, especially for this demographic, are volatile. The longer term trends are a more reliable measure, and that continues to show a consistent decline over more than two and a half years—a strong sign of recovery following the worst economic recession since The Great Depression.
Originally posted by soontide
Last time I checked, there were more democrats in the senate than republicans. Why aren't you blaming this on the democrats who crossed the isle and sided with the minority party? If they had stayed true, then the bill would have gone through.
Originally posted by crazyguy2012
Maybe I am wrong but it looks like there are 51 democrats in the Senate, 2 independents who usually side with the dems and 47 republicans. If some republicans voted in favor then it logically many dems voted against this bill as well. I do not see how the GOP can be blamed for this.
Also a title of a bill does not necessarily mean the bill will actually accomplish what is stated in its title. There is no guarantee this bill if passed would have been good and would have created jobs for vets. I am still looking for the actual text of the bill. You would have to read the actual text of a bill and not just its title to understand the full impact of any particular bill.
Originally posted by jam321
reply to post by Tw0Sides
Now
The unemployment rate for Iraq and Afghanistan-era Veterans (or Gulf War II-era Veterans) in August ticked up to 10.9 percent. However, as we’ve noted before, month-to-month unemployment figures, especially for this demographic, are volatile. The longer term trends are a more reliable measure, and that continues to show a consistent decline over more than two and a half years—a strong sign of recovery following the worst economic recession since The Great Depression.
.