Curving light waves, page 7

reply to post by Arbitrageur

---

Experiment picture comp.

a.

b.

Some more.

c.

d.

e.

Originally posted by primalfractal
reply to post by Arbitrageur

---

Could you please describe the experiment in laymans terms for everyone including the uses of the equipment you described?

I made a sketch:

The idea would be to move aim of the photon source from point A to point C while the wave packet is still in the process of exiting the device, to determine statistically over a large number of photons how much of the wave packet can exit the source while movement of the source can still affect the impact point B of the photon on the detector.

By detecting the precise time of impact of the photon, we can work backward from there to determine the travel time of the photon at the speed of light in the experimental medium to determine the time it exited the source with the goal of capturing photon impacts at the detector where the wave packet was partly out of the moving photon source as shown.

This was what I had in mind, is this also what you were thinking?

Originally posted by Arbitrageur

Originally posted by primalfractal
reply to post by Arbitrageur

---

Could you please describe the experiment in laymans terms for everyone including the uses of the equipment you described?

I made a sketch:

The idea would be to move aim of the photon source from point A to point C while the wave packet is still in the process of exiting the device, to determine statistically over a large number of photons how much of the wave packet can exit the source while movement of the source can still affect the impact point B of the photon on the detector.

By detecting the precise time of impact of the photon, we can work backward from there to determine the travel time of the photon at the speed of light in the experimental medium to determine the time it exited the source with the goal of capturing photon impacts at the detector where the wave packet was partly out of the moving photon source as shown.

This was what I had in mind, is this also what you were thinking?

To accomplish what exactly. I cant take the pain of reading this whole topic again.

reply to post by Arbitrageur

---

Thank you for your excellent contributions to this thread (and other)

reply to post by primalfractal

---

Yup.
Newtonian mechanics isn't even talked about anymore.

Gravity, shamavity. in a few years, who will remember.

reply to post by Arbitrageur

---

Um, you should know this BRO!

Your experiment violates laws of physics. How do you plan on moving the source that fast.
Think about it.
Also, what would you be trying to test?

reply to post by Arbitrageur

---

It makes no difference whether he was awarded an honorary degree or not. What's important is the elements that he foresaw.

I cannot find verification of the elements he foresaw, but looking at my .pdf of A New Concept of the Universe, I see that he said the following in his "An Open Letter to the World of Science" in 1953:

. . . Recalling the important contributions I have already made to science, such as my work in completing the hydrogen octave and my prior discovery of the existence of the two atom bomb elements given to the scientific world in my two Periodic Tables of the Elements, assures me that you will give serious thought and attention to these documents. . . .

Further than inciting research which yielded so-called isotopes of hydrogen and heavy water, nothing came of my effort, nor did I receive the credit due me. . . .

From Bearden's website:

Subject: RE: Tom Beardens PhD...
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 12:11:07 -0600

Tony,

Yes, I was awarded the Ph.D. for life experience and for life accomplishment (from Trinity College - Ed.), and I make no attempt to conceal it. I was awarded the Legion of Merit in Vietnam for similar reasons. If that makes it "bogus", so be it. I was also listed in Who's Who in Aviation and Aerospace, 1983, National Aeronautical Institute. I don't know what others may have done, but to obtain the doctorate for experience, I first was required to prepare a formal Ph.D. thesis, as is normal, and do several months of additional work for it. As might be expected, my thesis advanced the first legitimate theory of COP>1.0 EM systems, freely extracting energy from the vacuum. It also contained the first formal correction to Aristotelian logic since Aristotle advanced it. My M.S. in nuclear engineering was awarded by Georgia Tech under full rigor, as was my B.S. in mathematics from what is today Northeast Louisiana University. Those are the credentials, and one can take it or leave it.

One might point out that Heaviside --- whose equations are studied in university as "Maxwell's equations", and who originated some powerful mathematical methods as well --- never even attended university but was totally self-taught. Today, a very great many people for more than a century have happily used Heaviside's work, not really caring whether he had a Ph.D. or not.

The real judge is what a fellow does and the worth or non-worth of it. My book, Energy from the Vacuum, speaks for itself. My years of work in scalar interferometry --- trying desperately to get this nation to develop adequate defenses --- has in fact now been verified, both experimentally and theoretically, and scalar interferometry was the basis for Secretary of Defense Cohen's public statement in 1997 at a conference in Athens, Georgia --- the first confirmation of those weapons by a high U.S. government official. We do have adequate defenses today, at least a little bit as a result of some of my own hard work in convincing the system. Unfortunately the energetics weapons have now spread to even more powerful quantum potential weapons and negative energy EMP, so my weapons efforts are still continuing in that respect. Defending this nation comes first; after that comes the rest.

I'm quite willing to let that be the final arbiter.

Best wishes,

Tom

reply to post by Arbitrageur

---

Nice job.

reply to post by Arbitrageur

---

Will this show quantum effect though? Slits?

reply to post by primalfractal

---

The Curve is due to the Warping of Space/Time of both the Earth and the Moon.
Split Infinity

reply to post by ubeenhad

---

I see. Your right about my post but it must be possible to move it fast enough.

Mirror?

reply to post by SplitInfinity

---

This is interesting and I agree.

Seems to say all mass curves light to some extent unless the formula has some sort of cutoff.

reply to post by Arbitrageur

---

guess i gave you too much credit/

Here are a few reasons.


Propagation of EM waves
Wave particle duality
Photon info
Special Relativity

Read about privledged reference frames. You will get it

Well, it's posted on physicsforums.com, wonder how we will go?

"What happens to a photon wave packet when half out of a moving device?"

Linky

Pokemon discovered in Venezuela
  Posted 14 days ago with 47 member flags

89-Year-Old Man Develops Bladeless Bird-Friendly Wind Turbine
  Posted 11 days ago with 45 member flags

Amazing snowflake images that you have never seen before.
  Posted 14 days ago with 44 member flags

Energy Solutions THEY don\'t want you to know about
  Posted 14 days ago with 35 member flags

High speed video reveals the bizarre physics of an ordinary water droplet
  Posted 4 days ago with 32 member flags

Does this video show a working self propelled magnetic engine?
  Posted 7 days ago with 31 member flags

Viruses: alive or not?
  Posted 11 days ago with 30 member flags

NASA reveals secrets it has hidden on the Curiosity rover.
  Posted 17 days ago with 29 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: