It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by burntheships
So, you admit it is, then it is.
Originally posted by DarthFazer
What of that is my channel then what?
The burden of proof then falls on you to prove you recorded that,
as you admit you posted it.
I never claimed to be the OP video, thats downright silly to those who have
known me on this site for many years. But hey, I did warn you about that popcorn.
Originally posted by sonnny1
Maybe this will answer, what he really believes.
A key witness in a federal probe into passport information stolen from the State Department was fatally shot in front of a District church, the Metropolitan Police Department said yesterday.
Lt. Quarles Harris Jr., 24, who had been cooperating with a federal investigators, was found late Thursday night slumped dead inside a car, in front of the Judah House Praise Baptist Church in Northeast, said Cmdr. Michael Anzallo, head of the department’s Criminal Investigations Division.
Cmdr. Anzallo said a police officer was patrolling the neighborhood when gunshots were heard, then Lt. Harris was found dead inside the vehicle, which investigators would describe only as a blue car.
Key witness in passport fraud case fatally shot - Washington Times www.washingtontimes.com...
Originally posted by new_here
Well, goodnight my friend. I just wanted a simple answer about the other video. Just one little sentence. Not another 20 minute video to watch. I'm outta here. This thread is not user-friendly.
Brennan also defended treating Abdulmutallab as a criminal by having his rights read to him upon arrest and trying him in civilian court, rather than transferring the would-be bomber to military custody as an enemy combatant.
Just days later, Brennan gave a speech to Islamic law students at New York University, where he was introduced by Ingrid Mattson, president of the Islamic Society of North America. Mattson, who had been involved with the Obama inaugural prayer service, had come under fire then for her organization’s longstanding terrorist support.
During his NYU speech, Brennan defended the administration’s highly unpopular move to try al-Qaeda operations chief Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in federal court (which the administration eventually backed away from). He claimed that terrorists are the real victims of “political, economic and social forces,” said that Islamic terrorists were not jihadists, referenced “Al-Quds” instead of Jerusalem, and described the 20 percent of former Guantanamo detainees returning to terrorist activities as “not that bad” when compared to ordinary criminal recidivism.
During a talk at the Nixon Center in May 2010, Brennan said that the administration was looking for ways to build up “moderate elements” of the Lebanese terrorist organization Hezbollah.
Two weeks later, at a speech at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), Brennan defended the Islamic doctrines of jihad as “a holy struggle” and “a legitimate tenet of Islam.”
pjmedia.com...
Originally posted by DarthFazer
Originally posted by sonnny1
Originally posted by new_here
Well, goodnight my friend. I just wanted a simple answer about the other video. Just one little sentence. Not another 20 minute video to watch. I'm outta here. This thread is not user-friendly.
Hmmm........
Well WHY did you bypass this simple answer without a response?
Originally posted by new_here
Originally posted by sonnny1
Originally posted by new_here
Well, goodnight my friend. I just wanted a simple answer about the other video. Just one little sentence. Not another 20 minute video to watch. I'm outta here. This thread is not user-friendly.
Hmmm........
Well WHY did you bypass this simple answer without a response?
I did. I starred it. It was really nice of you to clarify that question for the other member.
I know that those two being fired- and maybe helping with the movie- is just a tangent of his main point. That is MY question. He says a lot of facts. He implies conspiracy. He never actually comes right out and says what he believes all of those facts tied together sum up to. It's a valid question, no? A lot of people act like it's crystal clear. To me it is not. Whatever-- I only came back to this thread out of respect for you to reply.
Anyone who feels led to sum up the guy's theory please send me a U2U.
Have a good night, all.
Originally posted by The GUT
reply to post by evilod
Thanks, evilod. Someone else told me they found that it did track back. Is it for sure the same unadalturated image?
Originally posted by evilod
reply to post by sonnny1
What I am saying is the youtuber is the one who put it there. Simple as that. Stanley is not embedded into the image, but his URL he provides to the image search included the text search "stanley inc" with it. What I'm suggesting is he put it there, and that the only connection between NewsPoliticsNow and Stanley is one he invented.
Originally posted by PsykoOps
reply to post by MsAphrodite
What's the actual evidence? I cant watch the vid now.
Originally posted by The GUT
reply to post by evilod
Yeah, I did the search with one of the other images from that linked page, added Stanley, Inc and got the same two results for Stanley, Inc.
Looks like case closed. Barring any further information, I stand corrected and Darth was right on about Monty. Thank you again, evilod. My apologies, Darth.
Still: NewsPoliticsNow and the Flick?
edit on 21-9-2012 by The GUT because: (no reason given)