It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
And the situation is not without irony. Feibush says he received a citation in August 2011 from the city for litter on the same lot that the city now points out is not his property.
Here's what Feibush finds funny about the situation: In the past few years, he's received three citations from the city fining him for not removing the snow from the sidewalk in front of this lot. Last August, he received a citation for the trash on the lot.
But he doesn't own the lot. He never did. And now that he's cleaned the lot, he's been threatened with legal action.
Originally posted by Sparky63
His best bet would have been to sue the city and also sue the city officials individually. or at least name them in the primary suit.
We had to do this in Romeoville, Ill when the city refused to issue final building permits after we purchased property and paid for the permits. Once the suits were threatened against the city and we threatened to sue the officials personally, the permits were miraculously granted and all obstacles magically disappeared.
I think what this guy did was honorable, but it just wasn't wise considering the legal ramifications.
reply to post by FortAnthem
it's a simple matter of trespassing.
Originally posted by FortAnthem
reply to post by Gridrebel
Great piece of research there. Shows what a bunch of hypocrites the city really is.
BTW, I found the reference to his being cited by the city for not taking care of that lot that he does not own several times.
And the situation is not without irony. Feibush says he received a citation in August 2011 from the city for litter on the same lot that the city now points out is not his property.
Yahoo News
Here's what Feibush finds funny about the situation: In the past few years, he's received three citations from the city fining him for not removing the snow from the sidewalk in front of this lot. Last August, he received a citation for the trash on the lot.
But he doesn't own the lot. He never did. And now that he's cleaned the lot, he's been threatened with legal action.
Philly.com
What I find really maddening about all this is that the property was owned by the REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY. Isn't it their responsibility to see that the properties under their care are rehabilitated in ways like Feibush did to this lot? :shk:
Originally posted by RealSpoke
He should have never admitted to doing it. They couldn't prove otherwise unless someone had him on video, which I doubt.
After the city "ignored" this lot for decades, Feibush said he is surprised it has taken such an interest, even visiting the site hourly when his work crew cleaned up the property to tell them to stop.
Originally posted by Soulece
I couldn't resit. The earth, especially America, is full of downright idiots.
Some idiots logic:
You own land. Land gets messy. Nobody likes land.
Noble man grabs hard earned money. Throws down to clean up your land free of your expense. You sue them.
'Mericaedit on 21-9-2012 by Soulece because: (no reason given)