posted on Sep, 19 2012 @ 09:19 PM
reply to post by METACOMET
If you took my comment as an insult it was by your own interpretation. IT IS NOT THE END ALL whether you want it to be or not. When laws HAVE been
passed and are BEING legally and lawfully upheld, THEY take precedence, LIKE IT OR NOT, until they are removed or the Supreme Courts change them. They
may be against the BILL of RIGHTS which is where the 1st AMENDMENT IS, Not the Constitution, but the law is what is upheld and the current law says
there are limitations. Do I like it? ABSOLUTELY NOT but that is how it is. You can not ignore current enforceable laws regardless of what the Bill of
Rights or the Constitution states. Can you fight it? Yes but it has to be done by way of CURRENT laws and regulations. Arguing on a forum is not going
to change the fact our speech is limited. This argument needs to be where it is meant to be directed which is the Government. We have been sold out
and our rights have been systematically removed or limited through loopholes and behind the curtains of past and current administrations. You can
quote the Constitution and the Bill of Rights until you are blue in the face but you will still be held to the laws that have been set down, accepted,
(The capitals are not me yelling at you. They are only for emphasis)
Edit to add a comment on this quote
Perhaps you think I'm stupid. Perhaps you think I'm incapable of understand the simple words "Congress shall
make no law abridging the freedom of speech"?
No I do not think you stupid. This is the way it is supposed to be I agree with you but it is not and they did.
edit on 19-9-2012 by Agarta because: (no reason given)