Study finds tumors in rats fed on Monsanto's GM corn, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 66 times
Topic started on 19-9-2012 @ 09:09 AM by Corruption Exposed

Study finds tumors in rats fed on Monsanto's GM corn


news.yahoo.com
In a study that prompted criticism from other experts, French scientists said on Wednesday that rats fed on Monsanto's genetically modified (GM) corn or exposed to its top-selling weedkiller suffered tumors and multiple organ damage.

Gilles-Eric Seralini of the University of Caen and colleagues said ra]ts fed on a diet containing NK603 - a seed variety made tolerant to dousings of Monsanto's Roundup weedkiller - or given water with Roundup at levels permitted in the United States, died earlier than those on a standard diet.

Experts not involved in the study were highly skeptical about
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 19-9-2012 @ 09:20 AM by SyxDaliGee
reply to post by Corruption Exposed



Does Not surprise me one bit! And of course it has found it's way to us. I believe that was an intentional 'side effect' of why they created the GMO's to begin with!? And aren't there some of our Gov Officials, past and/or present, like high count Stock Holders/Board Members at Monsanto?
I know, here come the Flames.......
Great Thread here! Thanx, Later, Syx.
edit on 19-9-2012 by SyxDaliGee because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 19-9-2012 @ 10:12 AM by LiberalSceptic
reply to post by MDDoxs



I also believe it can be used in good ways, so I see your point.
But it should be done in a nonprofit manner by open-source organizations. Taking time to do it the right way.


reply posted on 19-9-2012 @ 10:15 AM by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by MDDoxs



There is a HUGE difference between genetic modification for the purpose of good versus using poisonous pesticides on our food supply.


reply posted on 19-9-2012 @ 10:32 AM by MDDoxs
reply to post by Corruption Exposed



I agree, though i am not to sure how your comment directly relates to my post, as nowhere did i say the two ends of the spectrum were close.

Further, i was addressing the issue of creating a false image around genetic modification. As per the OP, the genetically modified crops were altered to tolerate the "Round-Up" pesticide. The pesticide is most likely the culprit in the growth of these tumors, but because the two work in conjunction with one another, GE Corn + Pesticide, the article appears to infer that the GE produce is just as responsible.

Don’t get me wrong, the blatant attempts by Monsanto to increase profits is sickening and it could tarnish the future development of this field.
edit on 19-9-2012 by MDDoxs because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 19-9-2012 @ 10:42 AM by wujotvowujotvowujotvo
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278691512005637

dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2012.08.005

Food and Chemical Toxicology

Available online 19 September 2012

In Press, Corrected Proof

Article history
Received 11 April 2012
Accepted 2 August 2012
Available online 19 September 2012

Long term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize

Gilles-Eric Séralini a,
Emilie Clair a,
Robin Mesnage a,
Steeve Gress a,
Nicolas Defarge a,
Manuela Malatesta b,
Didier Hennequin c,
Joël Spiroux de Vendômois a

a University of Caen, Institute of Biology, CRIIGEN and Risk Pole, MRSH-CNRS, EA 2608, Esplanade de la Paix, Caen Cedex 14032, France

b University of Verona, Department of Neurological, Neuropsychological, Morphological and Motor Sciences, Verona 37134, Italy

c University of Caen, UR ABTE, EA 4651, Bd Maréchal Juin, Caen Cedex 14032, France

Abstract

The health effects of a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize (from 11% in the diet), cultivated with or without Roundup, and Roundup alone (from 0.1 ppb in water), were studied 2 years in rats. In females, all treated groups died 2–3 times more than controls, and more rapidly. This difference was visible in 3 male groups fed GMOs. All results were hormone and sex dependent, and the pathological profiles were comparable. Females developed large mammary tumors almost always more often than and before controls, the pituitary was the second most disabled organ; the sex hormonal balance was modified by GMO and Roundup treatments. In treated males, liver congestions and necrosis were 2.5–5.5 times higher. This pathology was confirmed by optic and transmission electron microscopy. Marked and severe kidney nephropathies were also generally 1.3–2.3 greater. Males presented 4 times more large palpable tumors than controls which occurred up to 600 days earlier. Biochemistry data confirmed very significant kidney chronic deficiencies; for all treatments and both sexes, 76% of the altered parameters were kidney related. These results can be explained by the non linear endocrine-disrupting effects of Roundup, but also by the overexpression of the transgene in the GMO and its metabolic consequences.

Highlights

► A Roundup-tolerant maize and Roundup provoked chronic hormone and sex dependent pathologies. ► Female mortality was 2–3 times increased mostly due to large mammary tumors and disabled pituitary. ► Males had liver congestions, necrosis, severe kidney nephropathies and large palpable tumors. ► This may be due to an endocrine disruption linked to Roundup and a new metabolism due to the transgene. ► GMOs and formulated pesticides must be evaluated by long term studies to measure toxic effects..

Abbreviations

GM, genetically modified;
R, Roundup;
MRL, maximal residual levels;
GMO, genetically modified organism;
OECD, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development;
GT, glutamyl-transferase;
PCA, principal component analysis;
PLS, partial least-squares;
OPLS, orthogonal partial least-squares;
NIPALS, Nonlinear Iterative Partial Least Squares;
OPLS-DA, Orthogonal Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis;
G, glycogen;
L, lipid droplet;
N, nucleus;
R, rough endoplasmic reticulum (on microscopy pictures only);
U, urinary;
UEx, excreted in urine during 24 h;
APPT, Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time;
MCV, Mean Corpuscular Volume;
PT, Prothrombine Time;
RBC, Red Blood Cells;
ALT, alanine aminotransferase;
MCHC, Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration;
A/G, Albumin/Globulin ratio;
WBC, White Blood Cells;
AST, aspartate aminotransferase

Keywords

GMO;
Roundup;
NK603;
Rat;
Glyphosate-based herbicides;
Endocrine disrupting effects




reply posted on 19-9-2012 @ 10:52 AM by jessemole
reply to post by Corruption Exposed



CE. you are correct in all aspects of this..

No two ways about it. FDA, well its obvious their in
Monsanto back pocket, amoung others.

Warning labels they put on to their products we buy in retail outlets have a Warning, for Human and Pets to come into in contact when using it for whatever your cause in doing so.

Now is it any different in putting(poisons) the same base on our Food for the sake of preventing any growth from elements that were preventing profit.

Insects have it figured out...
That is to say they can die off by the thousands but they will adapt, we don't see that but it's known.
Meanwhile, we as humans are in a different positions to handle it. Here we can add, the Medical industry/Pharmacy is doing great!

But by Law, this was pushed somewhere down the line to protect them... presumely(Doctors) they can't tell you their real thoughts of the cause of your sicken body.

Meanwhile the masses will consume it with very little choice or insight.

Attack this with passion CE, there are many before you that had brought this to ATS table.
Make it a Movie for everyone to see... it could become a best film in all awards!
Just saying! Thats what it would take to get it out there.. MSN will only cover it afterwards.

But that would take a film company with Balls to produce it.

Thanks for showing your concern!

Jesse
.
edit on 19-9-2012 by jessemole because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 19-9-2012 @ 12:13 PM by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by MDDoxs



You are correct, I didn't properly comprehend your first post and unfairly nit picked that one portion without addressing the rest of your post so I apologize. I was multi-tasking and not being as attentive as I should have been.

You did acknowledge the evils of Monsanto so I should not have jumped on you like that, even though it wasn't meant to be confrontational so I hope it did not seem that way.

I still disagree with your views on genetic modification, even though I do see potential good that can come from it. My concern is that there is far more potential for bad then good considering the people who will most likely have access to this technology.

In your defense, if this technology was put to good use with truly good intentions by non corrupted people it sure could make the world a much better place.
edit on 19-9-2012 by Corruption Exposed because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 19-9-2012 @ 12:17 PM by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by jessemole



I'm glad you agree

Thankfully most people are waking up to the horrors of Monsanto (and friends) and the problems they are causing with our food supply. The whole system is so screwed up that they have managed to gain a complete monopoly on our food supply and their friends in high places make it more difficult for those who are aware to avoid their products, they also make it difficult to produce our own products that are less harmful.


reply posted on 19-9-2012 @ 12:18 PM by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by SLAYER69



Thanks for adding the thread as it is relevant to the discussion at hand

I have never seen that one before so I will need to spend some time reading up on it.
edit on 19-9-2012 by Corruption Exposed because: spelling is not my specialty today lol



reply posted on 19-9-2012 @ 12:19 PM by MDDoxs
reply to post by Corruption Exposed



No apology needed my friend.

I like taking the opposite side of the topic to offer a different perspective, even if that perspective is less popular.

I agree with you to an extent on the topic of exploiting genetic modification, but it seems that any new technological or scientific breakthrough has someone using it for harmful purposes. I am sure the telephone had its share of prank callers who took advantage of the new technology.

What we need to examine is the cost to benefit ratio, but perhaps that is for another thread.


reply posted on 19-9-2012 @ 12:19 PM by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by Unity_99



Wow!

I was unaware that it sterilized rabbits, but I am not surprised. Add it to the list of horrible things that their products do.

Wait until Beezer and Wrabbit find out about this
edit on 19-9-2012 by Corruption Exposed because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Israel angered over IAEA vote on nuclear arsenal
  Posted 13 days ago with 79 member flags
Neil Armstrong dead at age 82 - report
  Posted 17 days ago with 63 member flags
Judge orders release of detained Marine veteran
  Posted 19 days ago with 58 member flags
Birds hold \'funerals\' for dead
  Posted 10 days ago with 55 member flags
TSA agents swarm Ron Paul\'s plane, demand explosives check
  Posted 11 days ago with 47 member flags
Mysterious Changes in Ocean Salt Spur NASA Expedition
  Posted 1 days ago with 36 member flags
Ga. Murder Case Uncovers Terror Plot by Soldiers
  Posted 15 days ago with 32 member flags